Don't forget non-straight. Just because you're white and male doesn't make you part of the Republiclan.It doesn't need a definition for republicans, so the judge is right.
DEI is code for coloreds or anyone otherwise non-white.
If they feel that any system is not being 100% bent to advantage whites, particular white (fake) christian males, then just call it DEI and do away with it.
This is pretty clear for all to see by now.
This is one of the (many) sickening aspects of the last few months; the Supreme Court now seems more likely to undermine the valiant effort of most of the lower courts, instead of upholding and reinforcing them.In the meantime, however, the Supreme Court had shifted the ground on a couple of issues.
indeed, the election was purely cultural and based on how our fellow humans should be treated. How our tax dollars should be spent was the farthest thing from anyone's mind.Racist, arbitrary, and capricious is precisely what was sold to MAGA voters.
"I'm sick of having things 'rammed down my throat.'"indeed, the election was purely cultural and based on how our fellow humans should be treated. How our tax dollars should be spent was the farthest thing from anyone's mind.
It really hit home with me after the election when a very wealthy neighbor started talking politics at me, uninvited. He was of the opinion that MAGA won because people were "sick of having woke jammed down their throats". My response of "what does that have to do with how our tax dollars are spent?" thankfully ended the conversation.
LBJ's quote still holds up decades later:It doesn't need a definition for republicans, so the judge is right.
DEI is code for coloreds or anyone otherwise non-white.
If they feel that any system is not being 100% bent to advantage whites, particular white (fake) christian males, then just call it DEI and do away with it.
This is pretty clear for all to see by now.
Yes, the 6 conservative-leaning bumblefucks in robes decided that national policies only affect one person at a time and must be treated as such.Separately, Trump v. Casa blocked the use of a national injunction against illegal activity. So, while the government's actions have been determined to be illegal, Young can only protect the people who were parties to this suit. Anyone who lost a grant but wasn't a member of any of the parties involved, or based in any of the states that sued, remains on their own.
You don't rule like Republicans are ruling if you expect any institutional turnover.Hopefully this ruling can provide ammunition to others for filing their own court cases. This kind of ruling should apply nationwide, but thanks to the six chucklefucks on SCOTUS who seem hell bent on giving Trump ultimate power, it doesn't.
I can only hope that every court ruling - SCOTUS included - comes back to bite the GOP in the ass down the road.
The Democratic Party is constantly reminding me of the Communist Party in Germany for the first few years after 1933. They figured the political pendulum would swing their way in the next election, so the strategy was to lay low and let the political winds take their course.You don't rule like Republicans are ruling if you expect any institutional turnover.
Don't forget 'indoctrination'. That's one they like to throw around. Mostly regarding education.Can we just add "woke" in there too? between "DEI" and "woke" and "immigrant" all of our bases should be covered! That describes literally everything we don't like!
"I'm sick of having things 'rammed down my throat.'"
Said the man with a MAGA hat, and MAGA shirt, and MAGA shoes, and MAGA bible, and MAGA truck. It's not like they'd be fascists if they had an ounce of self-awareness, though, right?
indoctrination is a subset of "woke"The Democratic Party is constantly reminding me of the Communist Party in Germany for the first few years after 1933. They figured the political pendulum would swing their way in the next election, so the strategy was to lay low and let the political winds take their course.
I suspect you accidentally clicked on the wrong quote button. You probably meant to quote the post right below mine.indoctrination is a subset of "woke"
What gets me is that this path we're on is going to kill a HELL of a lot more conservatives than it will "the other guys", simply because the programs that are being targeted that "help the minorities" are the same ones that help the working poor, who are disproportionately supporting someone who votes for the GOP.OH NO. Not a stinging rebuke! If MAGA had any shame, they'd be taken aback at this, but alas they do not.
Now tell us how you feel about Civil Rights legislation.I take ideas and ideals very seriously, since I taught many classes on ethics for many decades. The Ideas, as Plato argued, are beautiful, good, and true. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are all superb specimens of Ideas in Plato's sense. That is a compliment, because, well, Plato, ok? "Idealism" is not a negative term.
But in institutional settings "DEI" is often a debate, not about ideas, but an administrative model known as vanguardism, and what powers such agencies should hold.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguardism
Vanguardism is profoundly cynical about human beings. They must be led.
I do not find that Idea beautiful, good, or true.
Even if you're white, male, and straight, you might not have voted Republican. THOSE people are in the crosshairs as well, though so far the more easily identifiable "others" are taking most of the fire.Don't forget non-straight. Just because you're white and male doesn't make you part of the Republiclan.
THAT is a line that needs to be more widely disseminated!"The Public Officials [at the NIH] in their haste to appease the Executive, simply moved too fast and broke things," Young concluded, "including the law."

No it code for anyone thay happen to hate right now, they will redefine it next week if someone stole their parking lot, or seemed happier than them, or more successful or whatever else they envy.It doesn't need a definition for republicans, so the judge is right.
DEI is code for coloreds or anyone otherwise non-white.
If they feel that any system is not being 100% bent to advantage whites, particular white (fake) christian males, then just call it DEI and do away with it.
This is pretty clear for all to see by now.
Yep, and it was an honest deal. Those exact features were on open display, and the MAGA voters got exactly what they were offered.Racist, arbitrary, and capricious is precisely what was sold to MAGA voters.
You taught ethics and apparently wrote "That is a compliment, because, well, Plato, ok?"!I take ideas and ideals very seriously, since I taught many classes on ethics for many decades. The Ideas, as Plato argued, are beautiful, good, and true. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are all superb specimens of Ideas in Plato's sense. That is a compliment, because, well, Plato, ok? "Idealism" is not a negative term.
Meh. Give 'em a year or so. They'll get around to saying it openly.Easy:
DEI hire is baseically anyone who is NOT a straight white Christian male under the age of 65 that speaks with a standard American English dialect. Any deviation of that is considered a DEI hire- regardless of qualifications.
Of course they can't admit this openly, so they won't.