ucsimon":odmiqxl7 said:I don't know. Isn't it important to turn a profit to be a hardware manufacturer? By all accounts I've read, Google is selling these at cost or at a slight loss - surely manufacturers can't afford to do that across their whole line. Especially when they can't expect any future income like Google and Amazon can from content/ads.
sciwizam":21qu3pya said:" We wish we could experiment more with it, but absent a real camera app, it just can't be done."
Aha, but there is. Here's the Camera Launcher for Nexus 7, by Paul O'Brian of Modaco.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... ralauncher
Now you are thanking Aha?caseyjohnston":od1o1z3l said:Aha, thanks! I'll try it out now and update if it works any better (I'm betting it will).
Unfortunately their relationship came to a sad end at the start of the video for "The Sun Always Shines On TV". It may be too much to hope for to enter the world of Aha via Skype.caseyjohnston":od1o1z3l said:"Take On Me, Take On Me: Revenge of the Jilted Pencil Sketch Girlfriend."
How the apps look is another matter. While most apps scale up pretty well to the 7-inch size, there are still some noticeable fuzzy edges here and there. The Android tablet market has provided little incentive for developers to scale up the graphics on their apps for larger screens; 7-inch tablets even less so, as regular smartphones edge closer to that size (witness the strange, and strangely popular, 5.3-inch Galaxy Note). The difference in graphics between the Nexus 7 and larger smartphones is small but visible.
clubside":2ofjs42i said:I always appreciate in-depth Ars reviews and hope those looking for a tablet in this range will find it helpful. But as usual I must protest the following missing items from The Ugly that I remarked on back when the first seven inches got reviewed:
Under 9"
Widescreen
By now the market has confirmed these rejections (widescreen is only useful for video and is actually a hindrance for important tablet uses like magazines and comics, anything under 9" and you may as well use a phone) so the headline for this review had me scratching my head: there is nothing diine here except perhaps the level of insanity that leads more and more under 9" widescreen tablets to be released.
litbolt":2nqo7baz said:I don't even need one of these but I kinda want one anyway. $200 for what is essentially an over-sized, phone-less Galaxy Nexus seems too good to let pass for some reason.
Why not? Google Search is free. Google Docs is free. GMail is free. They are just executing on their business model: make money on ads and give the rest for free or at manufacturing costs. Just keep clicking the ads.Leather Rope":22qev6jz said:At $200 retail, Google can't make a profit on these Nexus things. Google simply isn't into this long term
Leather Rope":1vf3dpze said:Author, your Fire analogy doesn't hold water. It's not a tablet. It's an enhanced eReader.
At $200 retail, Google can't make a profit on these Nexus things. Google simply isn't into this long term -- it's just trying to kick start. But the real hardware manufacturers know there is no profit as well. So what is their motivation?
Lastly, for serious Web browsing 7" is simply too small.
drfisheye":12cgau6i said:Why not? Google Search is free. Google Docs is free. GMail is free. They are just executing on their business model: make money on ads and give the rest for free or at manufacturing costs. Just keep clicking the ads.Leather Rope":12cgau6i said:At $200 retail, Google can't make a profit on these Nexus things. Google simply isn't into this long term
Leather Rope":jwvttb5r said:Author, your Fire analogy doesn't hold water. It's not a tablet. It's an enhanced eReader.
How often do you really need that much space nowadays? I fell for that a couple years ago with my phone, so I have 32GB of storage. I parked 14GB or so of music on it back then, which just sits there, hardly used, because of things like Pandora and Google Music. For documents, I just grab things from Dropbox when they're needed. Apps take up less than a gigabyte, even back when I had 140 apps or so installed. Even as a pretty heavy user, for 99% of my uses I could get by with 8GB or less, so 16GB is plenty for me.ScifiGeek":21hrmczp said:Having maximum storage of only 16GB isn't listed as a Negative?