[url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/civis/viewtopic.php?p=32362361#p32362361:1pgto8jc said:
AnteatersYellow[/url]":1pgto8jc]It sounds like they've spent a lot of time and effort on this, and it'll be totally ineffective for the target audience.
I'm fed up of this incompetence.
Firstly they see a problem and come up with a questionable solution. Ie, censor vs educate. Cheap and cheerful vs costly and multi-effective.
Then the censorship they apply is costly and impacts freedom and privacy for all, and ineffective for the target audience.
So once again I ask, incompetence or malice?
They're both reason for sackings and public outrage, yet the great unwashed seem oblivious.
I've never been so ashamed to tell people I'm from the UK, the home of politics that bring us such things as blind eyes been turned to paedo rings on one hand, yet blanket censorship to protect children on the other. Face palm.