Climate uncertainties and the problems communicating them

Status
You're currently viewing only lost_packet's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Not open for further replies.
The journal <em>Nature</em> has used a series of editorials to point out the areas of climatology that are the least understood, and considers why the public remains fixated on the basics instead.<BR><BR><a href='http://meincmagazine.com/science/news/2010/01/climate-uncertainties-and-the-problems-communicating-them.ars'>Read the whole story</a>
 
What do you expect from people that think the earth is 6,000 years old and no matter how much science you give them, it is rejected? <BR><BR>We also have staunch republicans that reject anything that comes from anyone they perceive as a democrat. Anthropogenic global warming is a perfect example. <BR><BR>People draw lines in the sand and will not budge. If the church believes in creationism, you MUST believe it too or you are not a good christian. If you are a republican, you can NEVER side with a liberal view no matter what science says. Got to thank idiots on Fox News, teabaggers, and christian conservatives for bringing us back into the dark ages.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Status
You're currently viewing only lost_packet's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Not open for further replies.