About 37 million infected in omicron wave, and 58% of kids were infected at some point.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Lower than I expected. Omicron, especially, was the one that everyone was going to catch, but in fact only about 11-12% of Americans caught it, according to this data. (A little higher than that, because it tailed into February, but that would be the bulk of it.)
That means there's a lot of misery left in the tank.Lower than I expected. Omicron, especially, was the one that everyone was going to catch, but in fact only about 11-12% of Americans caught it, according to this data. (A little higher than that, because it tailed into February, but that would be the bulk of it.)
I'm happy to put to rest that whole 'everybody is going to catch it' meme which did nothing but encourage people to stop taking basic precautions like masking and distancing.
That’s exactly what I expected. We had data from last year showing roughly 10% of tests were positive, indicating 10% or so of the population had it prior to delta or omicron.Lower than I expected. Omicron, especially, was the one that everyone was going to catch, but in fact only about 11-12% of Americans caught it, according to this data. (A little higher than that, because it tailed into February, but that would be the bulk of it.)
The sad part is there is pretty much no reason for most of those cases to have ever occurred, except for the war on public health. I hate to think of what the long term costs of this are to society.
Seriously, adjust your apocalyptic tone. My household spent two years avoiding it with masks, dual shot vaccinations, plus the booster. Omicron hit us out of the blue with two out of three of us catching it. One mysteriously continued to test negative throughout despite close proximity in isolation. There was no war on public health that caused us to catch it. Last I checked, alpha, beta, delta, omicron originated outside of the US and far from your alleged war on public health here.
The sad part is there is pretty much no reason for most of those cases to have ever occurred, except for the war on public health. I hate to think of what the long term costs of this are to society.
Seriously, adjust your apocalyptic tone. My household spent two years avoiding it with masks, dual shot vaccinations, plus the booster. Omicron hit us out of the blue with two out of three of us catching it. One mysteriously continued to test negative throughout despite close proximity in isolation. There was no war on public health that caused us to catch it. Last I checked, alpha, beta, delta, omicron originated outside of the US and far from your alleged war on public health here.
He isn’t wrong that there is a war on public health in many parts of the country though.
Does that number include an estimate of asymptomatic people like me? The only reason I know I had covid was a blood donation at Vitalant testing positive for antibodies (twice, both pre-vaccine).
The program uses blood samples sent to commercial labs for non-COVID-19 related testing, such as routine medical screens.
Damn right it's a war on public health. BTW. I'm one of the ones who didn't get it either. I didn't screw around and take stupid chances.The sad part is there is pretty much no reason for most of those cases to have ever occurred, except for the war on public health. I hate to think of what the long term costs of this are to society.
"NIH deeply appreciates the contributions of patients who have not fully recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection and who have offered their experiences and insights.... We now ask the patient, medical, and scientific communities to come together to help us understand the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection,"
And yet it's still far more effective than a number of other vaccines. For example, the MMR vaccine is only 78% effective against the mumps. But here's the thing: your statement isn't insightful as no one has ever claimed any vaccine provides 100% protection from infection.Anyway, the fact is, getting the jab does not equate to not getting COVID - too many break through infections prove this. The shots only reduce symptoms and thus lethality.
The sad part is there is pretty much no reason for most of those cases to have ever occurred, except for the war on public health. I hate to think of what the long term costs of this are to society.
I represent that remark. Fortunately, vaccine + booster did what they were supposed to do, and while I was symptomatic, I didn't end up in the hospital.The only time I got COVID was in January with Omicron and it was really random. Like I haven't left my house since COVID started but I got it from a delivery guy anyway. I was pissed to say the least as I was very careful.
Back of the napkin calculations on US Covid deaths.
US Population
329,500,000
US Covid Deaths
949,000
US Population who had Covid
140,000,000
% of death for someone who has had covid
0.68%
chance of death for someone who has had covid
1 in 148
% of death for US popuplation
0.29%
chance of death for US population
1 in 347
Road deaths in US per year (average)
37,323
Years of Pandemic
2
Road deaths during pandemic
74,646
% chance of death from cars
0.05%
Chance of death from cars
1 in 1876
Calculations with citations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0
Call me skeptical. From pretty accurate early models (Youyang Gou) to more recent estimates from well-respected experts (Trevor Bedford, Eric Topol, Natalie Dean), one of the few constants within an often fractured field has been that the real number of cases *in the US* is roughly 3x the reported number--or more like 4x-5x with omicron. That would argue for more like 55-70% of the population having been infected. Anecdotally, I would guess half or more of the people I know have gotten Covid. Undoubtedly others have had asymptomatic cases. And this is a highly vaccinated cohort.
Also, not to impugn the CDC, but I seem to recall the same people announcing that 95% of cases in mid-December were omicron--only to walk that number back to 37% (!) a week later...
Can't really belive anything coming from the CDC anymore, they are withholding data and numbers because according to them it's "not ready for primetime"! WTF???
It's sad how politicized this agency has gotten.
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2022022 ... id-19-data
Dr. Daniel Jernigan, the agency’s deputy director for public health science and surveillance said the pandemic exposed the fact that data systems at the C.D.C., and at the state levels, are outmoded and not up to handling large volumes of data. C.D.C. scientists are trying to modernize the systems, he said.
“The C.D.C. is a political organization as much as it is a public health organization,” said Samuel Scarpino, managing director of pathogen surveillance at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Pandemic Prevention Institute. “The steps that it takes to get something like this released are often well outside of the control of many of the scientists that work at the C.D.C.”
“Tell the truth, present the data,” said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert and adviser to the Food and Drug Administration. “I have to believe that there is a way to explain these things so people can understand it.”
In other words, COVID-19 is one of the deadliest plagues we've faced in a long, long time.
Is there a way to get vaccinated against car crash deaths? It would be great if we could reduce our risk of auto-crash death by 53 times /sBack of the napkin calculations on US Covid deaths.
US Population
329,500,000
US Covid Deaths
949,000
US Population who had Covid
140,000,000
% of death for someone who has had covid
0.68%
chance of death for someone who has had covid
1 in 148
% of death for US popuplation
0.29%
chance of death for US population
1 in 347
Road deaths in US per year (average)
37,323
Years of Pandemic
2
Road deaths during pandemic
74,646
% chance of death from cars
0.05%
Chance of death from cars
1 in 1876
Calculations with citations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0
I would think that the dampening of routine medical visits as well as the testing requirements prior to procedures would skew the % positive downward a bit. As well as the period not extending past January.Does that number include an estimate of asymptomatic people like me? The only reason I know I had covid was a blood donation at Vitalant testing positive for antibodies (twice, both pre-vaccine).
As the article noted:
The program uses blood samples sent to commercial labs for non-COVID-19 related testing, such as routine medical screens.
So probably yes but they didn't specifically look for asymptomatic people, just a random sample of the population.
Because we had an administration that spent four years attempting to actively undermine and politicize government agencies like the CDC. Contrast to the how the ebola crisis was handled under the Obama administration where there were only eleven confirmed cases and two deaths in the US. Even the swine flu pandemic in 2009 had vastly fewer cases, hospitalizations and deaths.Our health institutions, as a whole, need significant reform so that they can actually deal with fast-moving health crises. How can the C.D.C. not have the best experts and the best strategies on science communication? How can that be an excuse of withholding data?