Car dealers say they can’t sell EVs, tell Biden to slow their rollout

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,734
Also, I don't know who would want to buy an EV without NACS today.

Perhaps dealers and automakers should look into retrofit kits, so today's buyers aren't stuck with adapters for the duration of their vehicle ownership.
An adapter that you only have to use occasionally and is absolutely no big deal at all? Teslas have come with J1772 to Tesla adapters this whole time and you don't see anyone bitching about those.
 
Upvote
12 (14 / -2)

alansh42

Ars Praefectus
3,645
Subscriptor++
Since so many people are trying to get Bingo:

IMG_0035.jpeg
 
Upvote
43 (46 / -3)

TylerH

Ars Praefectus
5,031
Subscriptor
You may say it's due to "ignorance", but there's much more nuance to that.

Take my situation. I live in an area where the closest next city is 300km drive, and the closest place I'd call a metropolis is maybe 600km away?

An EV would not be a great choice "at the moment". Once battery tech improves not only for range, but winter driving, I'll consider buying one for sure. Until then, I cannot own an EV as my only vehicle, and I cannot afford 2 vehicles.
I feel for you, but the vast. vast majority of the US doesn't live in your situation. 83% of Americans (about 275.5 million people) live in urban environments. Not sure how many people on top of that live outside of an urban environment, yet still within 100 miles of one, but it's probably most of the rest of that 17%.

At 186 miles from the nearest city, you are an extreme outlier. At 373 miles from the nearest major city, that's like, limited to Montana or Alaska only.

Edit: forgot the ref: https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/built-environment/us-cities-factsheet
 
Last edited:
Upvote
28 (29 / -1)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,376
Subscriptor
Also, I don't know who would want to buy an EV without NACS today.

Perhaps dealers and automakers should look into retrofit kits, so today's buyers aren't stuck with adapters for the duration of their vehicle ownership.
Aren't there adapters? Or at least aren't adaptors possible?

Maybe the problem is that current cars simply don't support the higher DC charging rates that future NACS versions plan to support?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

QMaverick

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,031
You may say it's due to "ignorance", but there's much more nuance to that.

Take my situation. I live in an area where the closest next city is 300km drive, and the closest place I'd call a metropolis is maybe 600km away?

An EV would not be a great choice "at the moment". Once battery tech improves not only for range, but winter driving, I'll consider buying one for sure. Until then, I cannot own an EV as my only vehicle, and I cannot afford 2 vehicles.
Just about any EV on the market could get you to the next city over right now, unless you buy a lower range one and it's in the middle of winter. Even then, in MOST regions, the major corridors between cities have fast chargers now (and more are going in at a really fast pace). Unless you're doing that "next city over" drive every single day, an EV sounds just fine for you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
11 (12 / -1)

markgo

Ars Praefectus
3,886
Subscriptor++
Reminds me a lot of the pre-2008 housing boom. In 2007, any chucklefuck who could hold a pen could become a Very Successful Mortgage Broker.

By 2009, everyone found out it's not actually as easy as all that. I imagine a lot of car sales-holes got into it when cars were real easy to sell with markups and money was free long term.

That's... that does not accurately reflect reality. The BEV sales aren't easy... Or, rather, there's a lot less room for shenanigans. Everyone's done the research, knows MSRP, knows when they're getting screwed, etc.

There's a lot fewer people doing the "I been buyin' Oldsmobiles for 50 years from Steve King" dance.

Dealerships are fucked, long term. Can't wait until that model goes away.
Very much this. The car sales model is all based on the buyer’s inability to correctly value any aspect of the transaction. Not the base price, not the option package, not the—rubbing hands together gleefully—dealer added options or “destination” fees. Plus financing terms. Service contracts. Digital subscription promos.

It’s like a giant unstable Jenga tower. In the modern digital economy the dealers don’t have a monopoly on any of that anymore.

Not clear how it lands, but if EVs destroy the current dealership model, few tears will be shed.
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)

jnemesh

Ars Scholae Palatinae
828
Aren't most manufacturers selling $60K - $150K electric vehicles? They chased after the whales; GM discontinued the Chevy Bolt, their best selling EV and decided to offer more expensive vehicles. Of course demand plummeted - we call can't afford driving F150 lightnings around

Well, we COULD afford the model that was promised...you know, the $39,974 version? Remember? But Ford can't be bothered to make the vehicles that people want to buy at the prices they promised. No, they used the old "bait and switch" BS, promising an affordable EV truck, then delivering an $80,000 model that then got the prices jacked up by dealers!

And you wonder why they are failing...
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,934
Subscriptor
I feel for you, but the vast. vast majority of the US doesn't live in your situation. 83% of Americans (about 275.5 million people) live in urban environments. Not sure how many people live outside of an urban environment, but within 100 miles of one, on top of that, but it's probably most of the rest of that 17%.

At 186 miles from the nearest city, you are an extreme outlier. At 373 miles from the nearest major city, that's like, limited to Montana or Alaska only.
I call bullshit on him being 186 miles from the nearest city, even in Montana. Alaska, maybe if he's posting from a remote cabin in the Brooks Range. And even if he lives in a city that's 186 miles from the nearest other major city, I guarantee he's not making that drive more than a couple times a year, and never when it's 30 below. It's a bullshit argument.
 
Upvote
16 (20 / -4)

ColdWetDog

Ars Legatus Legionis
14,402
Wait does Subaru even have an EV? I thought zero Solterras had actually shipped?
Drove one last week. Tried to rent a Tesla (for reasons), Avis dumped the Solterra on me. Nice acceleration, handles more sluggishly than my lifted 4Runner - which takes some doing. I've been in tanks that were easier to get in to. Really, you had to fold yourself into the seat which is pretty amazing since I'm not exactly tall.

The real kicker was I could never get it to charge past about 50kw/hr. I stopped at several charging stations (complete with separate apps, thanks) and it would take hours to go from about 50% to 80%. And Avis didn't even give it to me fully charged.

Brought it back for a POS ICE car.

So, they exist, but they probably shouldn't.

FWIW, the Solterra is apparently based off the Toyota bZ4xys*(*&U#JH. Didn't fall far from the tree.
 
Upvote
19 (20 / -1)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,934
Subscriptor
Well, we COULD afford the model that was promised...you know, the $39,974 version? Remember? But Ford can't be bothered to make the vehicles that people want to buy at the prices they promised. No, they used the old "bait and switch" BS, promising an affordable EV truck, then delivering an $80,000 model that then got the prices jacked up by dealers!

And you wonder why they are failing...
$40k wasn't going to happen with inflation. The base price of an F-150 Lightning Pro is sitting at $50k now. Yes, a lot of loaded-up versions are sitting on lots, but it's not like Ford actually doubled the base price, and suggesting they did is way off base. It's a fair point to make without resorting to apples to oranges comparisons.
 
Upvote
-8 (3 / -11)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

QMaverick

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,031
I think the point is that, like vehicle to like vehicle, BEVs are much heavier. A Model 3 is 1,000 pounds heavier than a similar Elantra. Both have car-sized and rated suspension components. The BEV components will wear out faster than on a car of the same size.

That your truck, with substantially more heavy-duty components, has OEM parts 120K+ miles into it's lifespan isn't a fair comparison. I'd like to see that against a Rivian R1T (over 7,000 pounds lol) with 120K miles,
This is absolute nonsense. You can reinforce frames and suspensions on cars, and there are plenty of 200k mile+ EVs out there.

Also, there are plenty of heavy-as-hell cars out there that weigh similar to a Model 3. For example, a Challenger is about the same weight, and I don't see people online talking about how it's going to wear out its suspension faster than a Camry.

This is just fabricated FUD, plain and simple.
 
Upvote
36 (38 / -2)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,934
Subscriptor
There's a good bit of punching down in that bingo card...
lol, nah. It's just a lot of bullshit arguments that get pushed for bad-faith reasons by disingenuous posters. It is possible to make a select few of those points without being actively disingenuous*, but most of them are just disinformation, and people who bundle more than one of them into a post are nearly always particularly full of shit and arguing in bad faith.


*but even so, the few valid points on that grid are all basically self-evident and being worked on, so they're kind of stating the obvious and assuming readily apparent pain points aren't going to be addressed as the market matures and we move along the adoption curve, which is kind of dumb.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
20 (23 / -3)
Very much this. The car sales model is all based on the buyer’s inability to correctly value any aspect of the transaction. Not the base price, not the option package, not the—rubbing hands together gleefully—dealer added options or “destination” fees. Plus financing terms. Service contracts. Digital subscription promos.
Being faced with all that was largely why I chose a Model 3 over the Ioniq 5. If I could have bought it online I would have the latter sitting in my driveway right now.

Dealers put the noose around their own necks and Tesla is kicking out the chair.
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)
My friend went to an EV ride and drive (w/ dealers involved) in October and the first two things out of the salesperson's mouth is:
1. Our MachE Mustang is really new technology and there are some bugs.
2. "I'm not sure the grid can handle a lot electric vehicles."

Back in 2013, I went to test drive the Chevy Volt and was questioned why I would want this vehicle (at that time it was the 2012 Car and Driver Car of the Year). And why are we giving rebates to car buyers.

Dealers suck.
 
Upvote
31 (31 / 0)

illuminancer

Smack-Fu Master, in training
52
Weird. One of my friends was EV shopping and and this is the response he got from all the traditional car companies:

Long waiting list, and/or big extra markup over MSRP...

He bought a Tesla and didn't have to deal with either of those issues.

My wife and I did research on various EVs and narrowed it down to the VW ID.4 and the Ford Mach-E. We went to the VW dealership first because we've worked with them for over 20 years. Made an appointment and got the guy who's an EV specialist. Told him what we wanted; went to the lot and found one in the trim and color we liked. Drove it off the lot that evening.

I noticed that the dealership we went with is not on the list.
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)

Golgo1

Ars Praefectus
5,046
Subscriptor
Im wondering if anyone with knowledge can answer a question I have; What is considered 'unsold'?

In my area, I noticed there is a HUGE flood of 2021 and 22 Kona EVs available. These are used, off-lease. Most of them are flagged ad 90+ days on the lot.*
This, admittedly does clog up the lot like they say, but seems unrelated to the rules they are complaining about.

When dealers complain they can't sell EVs, does that include the lease vehicles they've already collected thousands on, and are slow to sell because they are used, and asking near-new price?
I would be SHOCKED to hear dealers are complaining about a situation they created


*I'm quite interested in the Kona, sounds good, but still expensive for used.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

federal

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
192
I just bought a new car and I noticed something interesting. At the dealerships I visited - Chevy, Audi, Mercedes, and BMW - they seemed to be struggling to sell their electric vehicles. They had loads of them, just sitting on the lot and in the showrooms, and they were even offering big discounts to move them.

But it was a different story for the gas-powered SUVs – those were hard to come by.

It got me thinking, maybe a more effective approach to cutting emissions would be switching to a vegan diet like I did in 2011. In 2021, cars and SUVs in the US, including the ones I was looking at, were responsible for about 374.2 million metric tons of CO2. That same year, the whole agriculture sector emitted around 671.5 million metric tons. A 2023 study in Nature Communications said that if we all went vegan, it could slash global agricultural emissions by a whopping 84% to 86%.

https://www.statista.com/statistics...=Greenhouse gas emissions from passenger,This
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/climate-change/
https://veganoutreach.org/environme...in Nature,Air Pollution: Environmental Racism
That's an interesting, if unusual, approach. I don't get why it was downvoted so heavily. They hate vegans?
 
Upvote
-13 (4 / -17)
View attachment 68476
I hate to point out the obvious but maybe this is why it's hard for dealers to sell EVs
I mean. The take-away for me is Tesla still has the luxury market sewn up, and would you fucking look at that the cheapest EV is right there at the top of the list in sales!
 
Upvote
16 (18 / -2)
I live in a very nice community of single family homes on .5-1 acre lots. We can't have an EV because in order to install a L2 charger, the service to the subdivision would have to be upgraded at an estimated cost of $25K, which nobody can agree to support through our HOA. So PHEVs for us.

I am an Electrician and I have several questions, because what you state does not make sense without clarity.
What size electrical service do you have on your house?
Where do you live so that the local electrical utility company is not in control of the transformers (which in standard residential neighborhoods are traditionally owned and maintained by the utility company)?
The most common, small transformer (on a pole for overhead fed services) can handle up to four 100A or two 200A service households. The standard ground transformers for underground services are more robust and can handle four 200A service households with no issues.
 
Upvote
20 (23 / -3)
View attachment 68476
I hate to point out the obvious but maybe this is why it's hard for dealers to sell EVs
Sort of. Tesla dominates the "expensive EV for people who can afford anything they want" market. That market is saturated. IIRC only the Chevy Bolt and Nissan Leaf are even trying to target a different demographic.
 
Upvote
5 (7 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

EtherGnat

Ars Scholae Palatinae
784
Subscriptor++
[/QUOTE]
Lol the discussion keeps on going for hundreds and hundreds of comments. You clowns always pile onto the press releases that present damaging questions and accusations about the narratives being swung by left-leaning technologists of today.

Nobody is going to read all of this, and you're not going to convince the folks that don't read Ars anyway, which is a much larger amount of people than those that do.

All this effort to drown out the truth that EVs are not desirable to the majority of car buyers, and that the media lives in a fantasy land where that is not the case.

So pathetic.

Is anybody here under the delusion we're going to convince everybody, much less people that don't even read ArsTechnica?

What we can do is address false arguments. For example the fact that nobody wants them. People like you will point to polls that show 60% (or whatever) aren't considering an EV for their next vehicle, but that means 40% are. EVs currently account for around 9% of new car purchases, so there's still a tremendous amount of upside. And those polls continue to climb every year. In part because EVs continue to get better, but largely because many of the people opposed are just ignorant about EVs. There's massive amounts of intentional disinformation and propaganda out there.

But the thing is, you can't keep people ignorant forever. People will be exposed to EVs, and the truth, and that tends to change minds. A massive 90% of EV owners plan to buy another for their next vehicle.

Regardless, you're not fooling anybody. Every accusation is a an admission with people like you. The only person desperate to spread propaganda here is people like you.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

Zubenelgenubi

Smack-Fu Master, in training
54
A couple of months ago my sister tried to look at a Chevy Bolt at DeNoyer Chevrolet in Michigan. They didn’t have one, we’re not interested in talking to her and refused to take her contact info and let her know when they might have one. I see they signed the letter. Pretty good evidence that the problem is not EV’s, but the dealers themselves.
 
Upvote
39 (39 / 0)
Lol the discussion keeps on going for hundreds and hundreds of comments. You clowns always pile onto the press releases that present damaging questions and accusations about the narratives being swung by left-leaning technologists of today.

Nobody is going to read all of this, and you're not going to convince the folks that don't read Ars anyway, which is a much larger amount of people than those that do.

All this effort to drown out the truth that EVs are not desirable to the majority of car buyers, and that the media lives in a fantasy land where that is not the case.

So pathetic.
Sorry, the gay conspiracy was getting boring, and the war on xmas doesn't start for another couple days, so Im hocking the grand EV conspiracy in the meantime
 
Upvote
33 (34 / -1)
What we can do is address false arguments. For example the fact that nobody wants them. People like you will point to polls that show 60% (or whatever) aren't considering an EV for their next vehicle, but that means 40% are. EVs currently account for around 9% of new car purchases, so there's still a tremendous amount of upside. And those polls continue to climb every year.

I think my favorite part of stats like that is the entire apparatus for drilling, refining, and distributing petroleum products collapses with a 30% decrease in demand. So if 40% of people do want an EV, then it is inevitable EVs will be the only thing available in my lifetime.
 
Upvote
21 (22 / -1)

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,370
Subscriptor++
AH! So the issue there is you need a licensed electrician to install a circuit, and that electrician needs a permit, and the HOA, on receiving a permit request can say "WOAH BUDDY SLOW THE FUCK DOWN You can't hog all our electricity!" and are unlikely to be mollified by the homeowner saying "I know how to fucking schedule appliance use".

Since when do HOA's issue permits? That's the city or county, not the friggin HOA.

Signed,

A former HOA victim.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)
Aren't there adapters? Or at least aren't adaptors possible?

Maybe the problem is that current cars simply don't support the higher DC charging rates that future NACS versions plan to support?

Yes, there are adapters, but that's something I'd want to use on rare occasions, and not something that I'll need to use more often and keep track of as the car ages. In 10 years, I'll need to keep using the adapter and possibly even have a hard time trying to replace it when in breaks.

A good analogy is like buying something with Micro-USB (or Lightning only Apple Keyboard) today. Sure, I can use a custom Micro-USB / Lightning cable for that one device while everything else is on USB-C, but why make my life more complicated? In 5 years, I'll still have to keep track of that one unique cable.

Alternatively, buy a Tesla today or wait a year before buying anything else.
 
Upvote
-13 (4 / -17)
I mean. The take-away for me is Tesla still has the luxury market sewn up, and would you fucking look at that the cheapest EV is right there at the top of the list in sales!
Yeah imagine how many Teslas would sell if they were cheaper :D My take is plenty of people want EVs, they just don't want the ones dealers are selling.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)