Wow that's madness.
That home looks crappy.
That home looks crappy.
Wow that's madness.
That home looks crappy.
Part of the reason housing is so expensive is that foreign buyers can essentially buy Canadian citizenship if they invest enough money. They don't immediately get citizenship, but they can get permanent residency by investing enough money, and that's generally seen as a path to citizenship eventually. Lots of rich people in other countries like China that want a safe haven to run to if something bad goes down in their own country, I knew someone like this, he had to go check on his family's unoccupied house in the GTA periodically while he was at UofT for school.
I remember being baffled when they announced that as their strategy for the housing price crisis. It not only doesn't solve the problem, but makes things even worse.And let's also not forget the low interest rates that have been in place for decades now, along with taxpayer backed CMHC insurance handed out to anyone who wants it. By the way, the Conservative plan intends to increase the length of mortgages available so even more people can blow their brains out with crazy amounts of debt. It all just pushes house prices higher, the more people can borrow, the more expensive things become.
Also there is the "Vancouver model" of transnational crime which has basically put real estate out of reach for all but criminals and the ultra-wealthy
Also there is the "Vancouver model" of transnational crime which has basically put real estate out of reach for all but criminals and the ultra-wealthy
That's not really true, I bought a place in Vancouver a couple of years ago and I'm not a criminal and not even wealthy. Low interest rates help a lot. Single family homes are out of reach for most people, though.
That 4.3 million piece of land would be worth more without the house on it. You're paying for the land/location nowadays and not the house that's built on it.
Also there is the "Vancouver model" of transnational crime which has basically put real estate out of reach for all but criminals and the ultra-wealthy
That's not really true, I bought a place in Vancouver a couple of years ago and I'm not a criminal and not even wealthy. Low interest rates help a lot. Single family homes are out of reach for most people, though.
That 4.3 million piece of land would be worth more without the house on it. You're paying for the land/location nowadays and not the house that's built on it.
Did you buy a condo or apartment? Because most of the remaining single-family stuff in Vancouver proper is insanely priced; I make good money and I wouldn't even consider it, even with a sub 3% interest rate...
Obama has endorsed Trudeau and wants him to continue to be PM. Weird for an American to do endorsements, especially a previous US president, but I guess he and Trudeau were pretty close so it makes sense.
Obama has endorsed Trudeau and wants him to continue to be PM. Weird for an American to do endorsements, especially a previous US president, but I guess he and Trudeau were pretty close so it makes sense.
Obama has endorsed Trudeau and wants him to continue to be PM. Weird for an American to do endorsements, especially a previous US president, but I guess he and Trudeau were pretty close so it makes sense.
Politicians should stay the f out of foreign politics.
I highly doubt the BQ will gain more seats than the Liberals in Quebec. Montreal won't allow it.
It's not necessarily Montreal where the Liberal seats are in jeopardy. Montreal itself seems to still be considered safe. Elsewhere though,there's tons of toss-up Liberal seats right now that are between them and the BQ, or between the Liberals, the BQ, and the NDP. The Bloc proportion of potential voters has seemed to have leveled off a bit after a week or two of steady rises, which causes current projections to agree with your suggestion that they won't get more seats than the Liberals. It seems more the question is if the Bloc will take a big chunk of seats from the Liberals. How the Liberals will do also depends heavily on if the NDP performs how they are polling. A lot of those toss-up seats were previously leaning Liberal but because of the NDP's strong performance in polling recently, they are now much less certain to be Liberal since the Liberals and NDP could end up splitting their votes and having the BQ win. I suppose the other thing to keep in mind is that the Liberals likely overperformed in the last election, and were likely always going to lose some of these seats in Quebec that they won last time but didn't previous control.I highly doubt the BQ will gain more seats than the Liberals in Quebec. Montreal won't allow it.
Hoping Obama Magic does the trick. :eyebrow:
This is compared to Trudeau's spread of 39% approve/53% disapprove. However Scheer also has twice as many people who said they didn't know compared to Trudeau. Scheer's approval being below that of the general numbers for the Conservatives suggests to me that he is likely not popular even amongst Conservative supporters. Net approval of -30% is substantial to say the least. You could take all of those "don't know" people,add them to Scheer's approval percentage, and only then would it match Trudeau in net approval. He's that unpopular. If the Conservatives win, it seems like it will despite Scheer's leadership, not because of Scheer's leadership.Andrew Scheer sees approval from a quarter (27%) and disapproval from
more than half (57%). One-sixth (15%) say they don't know.
he has +25% net favourability, up from 1% a week and a half ago, which is absolutely crazy. It's such a shame the NDP didn't let him loose like they did in the debate months earlier. I think our election would look completely different had they done something like that. Now that he's showing his personality and who he is, he's becoming incredibly popular.Half (52%) say they approve of Jagmeet Singh, up 17 points since Oct 2nd
(Oct 2: 35%). A quarter (27%) say they disapprove of Singh, down 7 points in
the same period (Oct 2: 34%). One-fifth (21%) say they don't know.
A new Forum/Toronto Star poll is out (note that's a PDF). There's some pretty interesting numbers in it. In general, the Liberals are at 30%, the Conservatives dipped below 30% to 29% (this is one of the first polls showing under 30% from what I remember), and the NDP is still hovering around 20%. The Greens are still sitting at 8%, the BQ at 7%, and PPC at 4%.
Scheer is incredibly unpopular:
This is compared to Trudeau's spread of 39% approve/53% disapprove. However Scheer also has twice as many people who said they didn't know compared to Trudeau. Scheer's approval being below that of the general numbers for the Conservatives suggests to me that he is likely not popular even amongst Conservative supporters. Net approval of -30% is substantial to say the least. You could take all of those "don't know" people,add them to Scheer's approval percentage, and only then would it match Trudeau in net approval. He's that unpopular. If the Conservatives win, it seems like it will despite Scheer's leadership, not because of Scheer's leadership.Andrew Scheer sees approval from a quarter (27%) and disapproval from
more than half (57%). One-sixth (15%) say they don't know.
Singh's numbers are through the roof:
he has +25% net favourability, up from 1% a week and a half ago, which is absolutely crazy. It's such a shame the NDP didn't let him loose like they did in the debate months earlier. I think our election would look completely different had they done something like that. Now that he's showing his personality and who he is, he's becoming incredibly popular.Half (52%) say they approve of Jagmeet Singh, up 17 points since Oct 2nd
(Oct 2: 35%). A quarter (27%) say they disapprove of Singh, down 7 points in
the same period (Oct 2: 34%). One-fifth (21%) say they don't know.
However, Trudeau still leads both Scheer and Singh for who would make the best PM by a few percentage points.
Climate Change and the environment are still the leading issue, though jobs are a close second now. This is why I thought it was bizarre of Scheer to say a day or two ago that the Conservatives' first order of business if they were to win would be to repeal the carbon tax. Climate and the environment have been either the top issue of the second highest ranked issue on nearly every poll I've looked at for months now.
A new Forum/Toronto Star poll is out (note that's a PDF). There's some pretty interesting numbers in it. In general, the Liberals are at 30%, the Conservatives dipped below 30% to 29% (this is one of the first polls showing under 30% from what I remember), and the NDP is still hovering around 20%. The Greens are still sitting at 8%, the BQ at 7%, and PPC at 4%.
Now there's news coming out that the Conservatives themselves hired a company to smear the PPC on social media. My impression is that parties don't do this themselves usually but instead 3rd party supporters sometimes do (like the company running anti-Trudeau "He was never ready" ads in spring that was technically unaffiliated with the Conservatives). The Conservatives themselves hiring this company does not help them shake their reputation for being dirty when it comes to campaigning, and this close to election day this will leave an even worse taste in people's mouths and is even more negative press for the Cons, who've had a fair amount lately. The anti-PPC campaign stopped on June 29th, which was the cut-off for third-party advertising though the company-run account continued to tweet stuff with similar content, but just didn't specifically target the PPC.
I wouldn't be shocked if the Cons did the same thing for the other parties. At this point I'd put nothing above them. They've essentially adopted Republican-style campaigning for a few elections now and, if I remember right, they hired a Republican strategist for this election.
Also funny in the other CBC article on this topic is that Bernier also was complaining about the Rhinoceros Party running a candidate named Maxime Bernier in Bernier's riding. I forgot about that. It's still pretty amusing.
I want to be optimistic, but I know better.
Good luck, everyone.
Yes, good luck folks. I'm following my usual strategy of "Expect the worst. Hope for the best". I'd like to trust the polls, but given how things have gone the last few years, I know that's not a great idea.I want to be optimistic, but I know better.
Good luck, everyone.
Given how important BC is going to likely be in this election, it's gonna be a late night for anyone staying up to see the results.I'd also like to be able to go to bed at my usual time, pretending that I can wait until morning to find out the results.
All of those "Canada Strong and Proud" groups are super shady."It just said they're urging me to vote with my conscience and that this is a very important election, and it wasn't really pushing any political agenda," said McKnight. "But it caught me off guard at the end because they said, I'm trying to remember the exact wording, but essentially, 'We urge you to vote tomorrow.'"
He provided CBC News with a screenshot of the time the call was made to his phone. When CBC called the number in the screenshot, it went to a voicemail message for a group that calls itself as Proudly New Brunswick.
McKnight said he didn't record the call.
CBC News left a message for Proudly New Brunswick, which wasn't immediately returned.
Proudly New Brunswick is affiliated with Canada Strong and Proud, a third-party group that opposes carbon taxes. CBC News has reached out to one of the directors of the group for comment.