As teens await sentencing for nudifying girls, parents aim to sue school

Status
You're currently viewing only daveok's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

daveok

Ars Centurion
319
Subscriptor
But officials—who at the time weren’t legally required to act—failed to notify parents or police for six months

Soon after, both its head, Matt Micciche, and the school board’s president, Angela Ang-Alhadeff, resigned.

Rather than act on the images, Micciche, the school board president, did nothing, parents alleged, until more information emerged in May 2024. The next month, the school filed a ChildLine report, but law enforcement did not launch a criminal investigation until parents eventually got the tip.

Lancaster District Attorney Heather Adams concluded that Micciche was not obligated to report the images because of a “loophole” that lawmakers immediately sought to close, USA Today reported. That loophole excused schools from mandatory reporting requirements for child-on-child abuse. Parents and lawmakers are pushing to close the loophole to ensure schools must report any AI nudes after the first detection.

I was wondering why criminal charges were not brought against school staff, and I guess this is the reason why. The perpetrators being under 18 is one thing, but the adults in the room literally did nothing. There's a difference between what's legally right, and morally right.
 
Upvote
87 (94 / -7)
Status
You're currently viewing only daveok's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.