Despite its all-in focus on Copilot, Microsoft continues to lose the software developer market to Apple (just look at the number of MacBooks that you see floating around Silicon Valley offices, or even within Microsoft itself). The Mac mini/studio are particularly nice for modern vibe-coders because they both have the hardware to plausibly support running local LLMs and because Apple's supply chains have somewhat insulated them from the global RAM shock.“Both [the Mac mini and the Mac Studio] are amazing platforms for AI and agentic tools, and the customer recognition of that is happening faster than what we had predicted, and so we saw higher-than-expected demand,” said Cook. “We think looking forward that the Mac mini and the Mac Studio may take several months to reach supply-demand balance.”
I forsee a future where smugglers ship:Don't forget to blame Trump with war as Helium supply for chip manufacturing in Asia is all but stopped. And how Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix all reporting RECORD setting profits since they diverted ram and storage to Data Centers instead of consumer computing.
Despite, or because of? Microsoft is hell bent on bolting Copilot onto everything, even Notepad, where no one asked for it in search of a reason to claim usage statistical growth. Excel at this point in a brand new blank spreadsheet has 10+ intrusive ways of invoking Copilot even accidentally. Click on a blank cell? There a Copilot button popup!Despite its all-in focus on Copilot, Microsoft continues to lose the software developer market to Apple (just look at the number of MacBooks that you see floating around Silicon Valley offices, or even within Microsoft itself). The Mac mini/studio are particularly nice for modern vibe-coders because they both have the hardware to plausibly support running local LLMs and because Apple's supply chains have somewhat insulated them from the global RAM shock.
Recently they've started pulling back on some of the dumber copilot integrations (like notepad) and other Windows apps. Still in early release builds but it's at least something.Despite, or because of? Microsoft is hell bent on bolting Copilot onto everything, even Notepad, where no one asked for it in search of a reason to claim usage statistical growth. Excel at this point in a brand new blank spreadsheet has 10+ intrusive ways of invoking Copilot even accidentally. Click on a blank cell? There a Copilot button popup!
And don't get me started on the shoddy QC for update of late.
I've had two computers for the last 5 years. An M1 MBA for travel, and a high end desktop PC for my CAD work and heavy lifting.Despite, or because of? Microsoft is hell bent on bolting Copilot onto everything, even Notepad, where no one asked for it in search of a reason to claim usage statistical growth. Excel at this point in a brand new blank spreadsheet has 10+ intrusive ways of invoking Copilot even accidentally. Click on a blank cell? There a Copilot button popup!
And don't get me started on the shoddy QC for update of late.
Yep. To the latter point, on the same earnings call Cook noted that starting in Q2 their memory costs went way up and will likely continue increasing. Will not be surprised if in 4-6 months, all Macs are $300-600 more expensive at any given BTO memory point, than they were just a few weeks ago.Tim Cook, even with retirement coming, is still the pitch man with CEO buzzwords like "The Mac mini and Mac Studio are amazing platforms for AI and agentic tools, Higher than Expected Demand and can "probably" be blamed on multiple factors..." and yet Cook of all people has decades of expertise with logistics and parts suppliers. Hmmmmm. How's that gift to Trump benefiting Apple customers now, Tim? Might have bought tariff relaxation but who saw Iran war, attrition and blockades? And off the radar is China with Panamanian ports...seems its quid pro quo!
Don't forget to blame Trump with war as Helium supply for chip manufacturing in Asia is all but stopped. And how Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix all reporting RECORD setting profits since they diverted ram and storage to Data Centers instead of consumer computing.
I forsee a future where smugglers ship:
- Nvidia GPUs from the USA to China, and
- Consumer RAM from China to the USA
I dumped my Windows system for only-gaming duties. First with an M2Pro Mac Mini, but I found 16GB of RAM not enough...and when I went to replace it with an m4, the higher RAM configs were all out of stock on the refurb store--and so have a Framework Desktop running Bazzite instead. Couldn't be happier--well except for HDMI being jagoffs and refusing to allow AMD Linux drivers to run the 2.1 spec because they are jagoffs.I've had two computers for the last 5 years. An M1 MBA for travel, and a high end desktop PC for my CAD work and heavy lifting.
I'm saying goodby to Windows and solving both problems with an M5 MBA. I know I'm not a big enough customer for MS to care or even notice, but Windows has become so enshitified I can no longer deal with it.
I wish them luck, seriously.Recently they've started pulling back on some of the dumber copilot integrations (like notepad) and other Windows apps. Still in early release builds but it's at least something.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-...-branding-from-windows-11-but-the-ai-remains/
Windows is even worse than that. Remember how you used to be able to have one screen to click on to select/deselect "run in background" for applications?Recently they've started pulling back on some of the dumber copilot integrations (like notepad) and other Windows apps. Still in early release builds but it's at least something.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-...-branding-from-windows-11-but-the-ai-remains/
It is still mind-bending to me that with the demand TSMC experiences, no one is able to seriously challenge them. I realize that the technical and financial challenges are close to insurmountable, but still. The reward is enormous.
Each fab line is like a 2KM long manufacturing line with bleeding edge everything and oh yeah, it's all in a clean room. New fab lines cost in the neighborhood of $50B in real capital. (And mind you that's $50B that it cost TSMC who for sure gets tax breaks and other incentives from Taiwan that nobody else is going to getIt is still mind-bending to me that with the demand TSMC experiences, no one is able to seriously challenge them. I realize that the technical and financial challenges are close to insurmountable, but still. The reward is enormous.
The limit is basically literally everything. ASML is only part of a huge picture.Pretty sure the actual issue/bottleneck is the manufacture of the fab machines themselves.
Anyone remember/know if Intel makes their own fab machines or do they buy from that one same company?
And not only that, that is just the fab. You need packaging and so on. And all that stuff got built next door to each other in industrial centers in China and Taiwan. IIRC a couple of the new fab facilities in Airzona started producing silicon. Except they have to send product back to Taiwan/China for finishing because the packaging and so on is back there.Each fab line is like a 2KM long manufacturing line with bleeding edge everything and oh yeah, it's all in a clean room. New fab lines cost in the neighborhood of $50B in real capital. (And mind you that's $50B that it cost TSMC who for sure gets tax breaks and other incentives from Taiwan that nobody else is going to get
So unless you're Morris Chang's other cousin and you're opening your new fab in Taiwan, I am guessing you can stack another $5-10B on top. Who's going to invest $60B for a moving target?
At one point there was a Symbolics Lisp Machine in many fab lines that were irreplicable and stockpiled.And not only that, that is just the fab. You need packaging and so on. And all that stuff got built next door to each other in industrial centers in China and Taiwan. IIRC a couple of the new fab facilities in Airzona started producing silicon. Except they have to send product back to Taiwan/China for finishing because the packaging and so on is back there.
It is not dissimilar in concept to the Detroit Autos needing to send an engine they "build" back and forth to Canada a couple times. Because not all the steps in the production chain are domestic.
Yes, Tim is over-hyping the platform, as always.Tim Cook, even with retirement coming, is still the pitch man with CEO buzzwords like "The Mac mini and Mac Studio are amazing platforms for AI and agentic tools, Higher than Expected Demand and can "probably" be blamed on multiple factors..." and yet Cook of all people has decades of expertise with logistics and parts suppliers.
Each fab line is like a 2KM long manufacturing line with bleeding edge everything and oh yeah, it's all in a clean room. New fab lines cost in the neighborhood of $50B in real capital. (And mind you that's $50B that it cost TSMC who for sure gets tax breaks and other incentives from Taiwan that nobody else is going to get
So unless you're Morris Chang's other cousin and you're opening your new fab in Taiwan, I am guessing you can stack another $5-10B on top. Who's going to invest $60B for a moving target?
Every OS will need to do that once people get serious about security. I'm betting that all OSes will need to be immutable and verifiable by hashes to access certain things within the next decade or so. We're headed into a zero trust future and there's really no other way. Apple kinda already does this with MacOS and Linux has some solid projects doing it (Fedora Silverblue, etc.).I dumped my Windows system for only-gaming duties. First with an M2Pro Mac Mini, but I found 16GB of RAM not enough...and when I went to replace it with an m4, the higher RAM configs were all out of stock on the refurb store--and so have a Framework Desktop running Bazzite instead. Couldn't be happier--well except for HDMI being jagoffs and refusing to allow AMD Linux drivers to run the 2.1 spec because they are jagoffs.
I wish them luck, seriously.
They have a 10GB+ OS full of legacy garbage and half-finished half-baked features...and they kept bolting onto it, and patching on top of patching, for years. Someone on Ars in a prior MS story was of the opinion that MS basically needs an OSX moment, where they break legacy compatibility and start of fresh with a sane and maintainable and secure OS from ground up....because there's probably too much legacy garbage and patches to fix without it being basically a Jenga tower. And, I am prone to agree.
Cook's reply about the RAM situation.In the December quarter, we really had a minimal impact due to memory, and you can kind of see that in the gross margin results. We said it would be a bit more in the March quarter, and we did see higher memory costs in the March quarter, and they were partially offset by benefits from carry-in inventory that we had. For the June quarter and what’s embedded in the guidance that Kevan went through earlier, we expect significantly higher memory costs. They are also partly offset by the benefit of carry-in inventory. And then, where we don’t give color beyond June, I can tell you that beyond the June quarter, we believe memory costs will drive an increasing impact on our business. And we’ll continue to evaluate this, and as we’ve said before, we’ll look at a range of options.
You are 107% correct. But let me add that things look even better for Apple in the local model and model fine tuning space than what your comment leads on.Despite its all-in focus on Copilot, Microsoft continues to lose the software developer market to Apple (just look at the number of MacBooks that you see floating around Silicon Valley offices, or even within Microsoft itself). The Mac mini/studio are particularly nice for modern vibe-coders because they both have the hardware to plausibly support running local LLMs and because Apple's supply chains have somewhat insulated them from the global RAM shock.
Which isn't surprising. The TLDR of his statement: We have input-component stock and are burning through it as a buffer against increased prices. The same thing most companies did with panic-buying and warehousing lots of stock to delay the pain of the Trump tariffs.Cook's reply about the RAM situation.
China does not produce enough RAM (or NAND Flash, for that matter) to feed the smuglers.I forsee a future where smugglers ship:
- Nvidia GPUs from the USA to China, and
- Consumer RAM from China to the USA
I also want to pick up an M5 studio. But I want it for running local models sooooooo….As someone who wants to pick up a M5 Studio this year… god, I'm so fucking sick of AI.
Intel Foundry and Samsung Foundry are the only viable alternatives from the Lithography angle, and they are not too distant to TSMC really. The differences from a litho and performance point of view are small, and there is some movement in that direction with companies (particularly AI companies) using (or planning to use) their services in lieu of TSMC's.It is still mind-bending to me that with the demand TSMC experiences, no one is able to seriously challenge them. I realize that the technical and financial challenges are close to insurmountable, but still. The reward is enormous.
For sure, Apple just underestimated demand and the AI bros buying up all TSMC can output gives them no options to alter orders. Cook, the supply-chain genius, kind of blamed himself "we just under-called the demand" and will leave his role as CEO on a miss here, which is kind of ironic.Which isn't surprising. The TLDR of his statement: We have input-component stock and are burning through it as a buffer against increased prices. The same thing most companies did with panic-buying and warehousing lots of stock to delay the pain of the Trump tariffs.
I'm waiting for a Fast and the Furious reboot where they steal RAM instead of DVD players.I forsee a future where smugglers ship:
- Nvidia GPUs from the USA to China, and
- Consumer RAM from China to the USA
Even when you've got governments with the capital and willingness to fund decades-long projects, there's no guarantee that they can manage the program successfully (i.e. California's high-speed rail boondoggle) or overcome the enormous technical challenges involved with leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing.Exactly the kind of things governments are for, to fund those insurmountable things, where the return on investment isn't literal dollars and the timeline is generations. Unfortunately here in the US we don't currently have a functional government that wants to make smart investments.
I mean, Microsoft kind of already had an OSX moment, and they had it around the same time that Apple did. Windows XP, the consumer OS, came from Windows NT and 2000, not 98 and Me, and that came with a drop in legacy support. Now, is the comparison exact? No, it isn't. But the other problem is that for a not-insignificant part of the user base, the legacy compatibility is the point.I dumped my Windows system for only-gaming duties. First with an M2Pro Mac Mini, but I found 16GB of RAM not enough...and when I went to replace it with an m4, the higher RAM configs were all out of stock on the refurb store--and so have a Framework Desktop running Bazzite instead. Couldn't be happier--well except for HDMI being jagoffs and refusing to allow AMD Linux drivers to run the 2.1 spec because they are jagoffs.
I wish them luck, seriously.
They have a 10GB+ OS full of legacy garbage and half-finished half-baked features...and they kept bolting onto it, and patching on top of patching, for years. Someone on Ars in a prior MS story was of the opinion that MS basically needs an OSX moment, where they break legacy compatibility and start of fresh with a sane and maintainable and secure OS from ground up....because there's probably too much legacy garbage and patches to fix without it being basically a Jenga tower. And, I am prone to agree.