Because this specific path disincentivizes companies from working with the domestic labor force.These people have generally been on the payroll for multiple years and are getting their green cards - it’s how you become a US citizen.
But you want to disincentivize a path to legal citizenship for them. Why?
The usual way?In what way?
As long as "whomever they want" is "best American (or refugee I think) for the job, and failing an adequate candidate amongst that hundreds of millions strong population, an international version of same", yes.Shouldn't companies be allowed to hire whomever they want as long as they not hiring illegal immigrants?
Literally you.Wow, so much wrong with this.
It's widely known:Do you have any evidence that workers on visas “disincentivize working with the domestic labor force”? You know repeatedly posting the same thing doesn’t make it true.
Are you for real?Also, there wasn’t a suit. There were allegations that were settled.
Again, you're being absurd. No one's alleging that Apple is issuing them, and your attempt to win internet points on this is childish and intellectually dishonest.And just so you are aware, Apple isn’t a govt entity and doesn’t hand out green cards.
You didn't even bring up 4 things lolYou’re zero for four so far.
I mean, this is just wrong...To be clear… this applied to existing employees, who had already been through a full, open, recruitment process. This wasn’t for new hires but supporting evidence for PERM applications to show that Apple had been unable to fill the role with a US employee. Basically, it’s supplementary material to support the earlier hiring decision.
That's what I meant by "adequate candidate", but thanks for that bit about universities... I had no idea they had special rulesIt shouldn't have been downvoted, IMO, but that's not how the law works. The law says you must hire any American who meets the qualifications in the job description. The only exception is for university professors - universities are in fact allowed to hire the best candidate, even if there are other applicants.
I posted it a page ago...I wholeheartedly agree the US needs a new immigration system that lets companies hire the talent they truly need, but where is the proof that the H1B program is keeping tech salaries down in the US? The US has some of the highest-paid and highest average-paid software engineers in the world - that is why everyone wants to work in Silicon Valley. I get there are specific cases where software teams have been replaced by foreigners, whether they be immigrants to the US or outsourced to people living in cheaper foreign countries. However, this has not put a dent in average salaries for software developers in the US over the long run.