Apple used to have a really good set of Human Interface Guidelines, and this violates pretty much all of them. it looks cool, i guess, but for a start, removing color from all the icons is an obvious backward step in distinguishing between them.
It's not just tiling.People have already questioned the "new" Messages feature in this thread, but how is this window tiling any different to what iPadOS already has?
Yeah, was thinking about this the other day. I use both Mac and Windows, and have few complaints about either (Windows 11 start menu is dumb, but I don't use it; Finder drives me up a wall, but it ultimately gets the job done with a bit more fiddling than I like). I haven't encountered a real crash or corruption in a decade or more, and both just get the job done.I sort of feel bad for consumer OS designers. Because OSes work pretty well. They aren't perfect, but they're pretty good. They crash almost never. Their security is not perfect, but not the spectacular horribleness it was a decade ago. Things just work. Both hardware and software, things really do work well. (I'm sure there are those will disagree with me, but you go figure out how to get X-Wing running on a system with a SoundBlaster card, printer, joystick, and network card first, and then come back and tell me how horrible things are.)
But it's hard to convince people to buy new hardware, or new software, when what they have works pretty well. And OS developers would like to stay employed, and it's hard to do that when you're fixing edge cases that a minisucle percent of the population will ever encounter.
So we're at the fashion industry part of the cycle, where things get changed randomly, only the newest hardware can support the latest shiny thing, and you hope enough people will need bellbottoms, or whatever this year's hot new trend is.
project looking glass, maybe?I remember playing with "liquid glass" in Linux (KDE?) ~15 years ago.
Totally agree.Yeah, was thinking about this the other day. I use both Mac and Windows, and have few complaints about either (Windows 11 start menu is dumb, but I don't use it; Finder drives me up a wall, but it ultimately gets the job done with a bit more fiddling than I like). I haven't encountered a real crash or corruption in a decade or more, and both just get the job done.
OSes are no longer exciting, and that's wonderful.
How are they not keeping up with AI competitors? When it comes to interacting with something, do you want something that does amazing things 90% of the time, and completely screws up the other 10%, or do you want something that works OK 100% of the time? There are tradeoffs, and Apple often/usually errs on the side of consistency.Throughout the keynote, the presenters employed the same odd syntax: “X has never been more Y”, as in “Icons have never been more beautiful“. The intent of this Madison Avenue language is to imply improvement when nothing significant is improving.
The entire presentation should be seen as this: “We can’t get Siri to keep up with its AI competitors, and in the face of our humiliation we need to distract you with shiny things.“
It‘s not quite rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic; it’s more like rearranging the deck chairs on a really boring cruise to nowhere.
Because something that looks cool and different in TV ads help sells new hardware.I don’t understand - why would Apple think de-emphasizing the INFORMATION-bearing part of the display in favor of the NON-information-bearing background? How do they think that is good?
I don’t need “amazing things”. I just said to Siri, “What’s today’s weather?”. After the answer I said, “And what about tomorrow?” Instead of tomorrow‘s weather I got a complete non sequitor. The amazing thing is that after years of development Siri can’t handle something so basic.How are they not keeping up with AI competitors? When it comes to interacting with something, do you want something that does amazing things 90% of the time, and completely screws up the other 10%, or do you want something that works OK 100% of the time? There are tradeoffs, and Apple often/usually errs on the side of consistency.
You joke, but I kinda like that ideaI suggest that for next year they roll out "true translucency" as their next big feature, using the phone's rear cameras to show you the real world behind the phone and overlay the enitre UI on top of that.
/s
It's a pendulum, and it has to be, otherwise we'll run out of employed UI/UX designers.At this point, I'm convinced that UI/UX, much like fashion, is simply one giant circular construct of ideas that get re-cycled for the next generation every decade or two. Up next will be the return of Parachute Pants and Skeuomorphism.
View attachment 111241
Are they trying to make this shit as difficult to parse in a single glance?
I mean, it's literally been more than a decade since the last UI overhaul. 12 years, actually. If the designers are actually keeping their jobs only to redo the UI every 12 years, by extension that would mean they're getting paid for ~10-11 years to do nothing.
There's "change for the sake of change" and then there's "trying a new direction once a decade." The latter hardly seems egregious.
That said, some of the screenshots... yikes.
I neither liked or disliked it, but I did think that it was a big improvement over the Fisher-Price design language of Luna.Am I the only one who thinks this is cool??? Look guys I miss Windows Aero it looked great. I did not like it back in the day due to performance issues but it was stunning.
Maybe I am just a sucker for nostalgia but this is something I am looking forward to![]()