Apple’s AirPods Max 2 release with H2 chip, boosted ANC in April for $549

freaq

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,285
Ok better I guess, but it feels odd to see it updated with a 3 year old chip when theres likely a new one thats coming fairly soon?

Having the ability to play lossless is nice i suppose, i personally am to old to hear the difference anymore, but that does probably represent a nice feature

Also means listening and charging at the same time, main question is how heavy that cable would feel (as a normal
Audio cable is pretty light and supple)
 
Upvote
54 (56 / -2)

burnedsmores

Smack-Fu Master, in training
6
No improvement on the ear design (stiff mesh cups are great for breathability but put cold metal close to warm body = condensation problems) or head design (stiff metal frame with cloth bridge = worn out floppy cloth headband after like 3 months) is pretty wack after 5 years. Still shipping with the Pampers collab "case"?
 
Upvote
19 (38 / -19)

fishbert

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
155
Subscriptor
$549. I don't think so.
Same price as before ... only, that model was introduced so long ago one should probably include the effect of inflation at this point.

edit: Oh wow, inflation calculators say that original 12/2020 price is ~$690 in today's money. I wasn't expecting it to be quite that significant!
 
Last edited:
Upvote
100 (105 / -5)

reiggin

Smack-Fu Master, in training
54
The addition of lossless audio via USB-C is nice but it's hard to overlook the complaints about durability of the AirPod Max. I like my Sony WH-1000XM5s but I find the Sony app to be a little annoying with the settings. That being said, they work pretty well 99% of the time with no tinkering needed. Since the WH-1000XM6 is $100 less than the AirPod Max 2 (and often on sale for $399), it's a hard sale for Apple with the only real advantage being the ecosystem integration.
 
Upvote
38 (39 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

markgo

Ars Praefectus
3,921
Subscriptor++
I wonder if the “improved” Conversation Awareness still mistakes “singing along with the chorus” for “having a conversation”.

I’ve had to turn it off in my AirPods because the false triggers exceed real by 100-1 and no one thinks you can hear unless you take one out anyway. I imagine that would be even more true for enormous over-the-ear cans.
 
Upvote
19 (24 / -5)

Fred Duck

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,397
$549. I don't think so.
It's true!
AirPods Max 2 the Minimum Minimum Max.jpg
 
Upvote
58 (70 / -12)

betray

Seniorius Lurkius
24
I wonder if the “improved” Conversation Awareness still mistakes “singing along with the chorus” for “having a conversation”.

I’ve had to turn it off in my AirPods because the false triggers exceed real by 100-1 and no one thinks you can hear unless you take one out anyway. I imagine that would be even more true for enormous over-the-ear cans.
I mean, it's working as intended, so not really a "false trigger". The microphone detects your voice and attenuates the audio because it thinks you might be talking. Which you are.

I don't think that feature ever claimed to be able to tell the difference between singing and speaking.
 
Upvote
42 (46 / -4)
Disappointing. I was hoping they’d use this update to upgrade the onboard DAC to one that can handle HiRes over USB-C. Is that difficult to at least bump it from 48 kHz to 96 kHz?

I find it mind-boggling that despite Apple Music having had HiRes music for years, Apple doesn’t sell much in the way of hardware that supports it. Third party external DACs work, but they are not an elegant solution, especially since a lot of them are USB-A.
 
Upvote
-9 (12 / -21)

bigcheese

Ars Praetorian
584
Subscriptor
can you turn them off yet?
This. How hard is it to just have a slider to turn off or on?

My guess is that they had the experience of the regular airpods in mind when they designed this, you just pop them out of their housing, put them in your ears and automatically they're on. The problem is that no one uses the case for the maxes so essentially they are just on all the time.

Typical apple, "you're not using them right" I assume.
 
Upvote
31 (35 / -4)

ktmglen

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,686
I know you’re only joking, but fwiw their supposed successors, the MDR-M1 have been out for a bit over a year, and they sound really good.
I have a pair of the MDR-V6 headphones that came before both. And a pair of the MDR-7506. Didn't know there was an MDR-M1 but that price ... oof.
 
Upvote
-2 (3 / -5)

oldgus

Seniorius Lurkius
27
Subscriptor++
Disappointing. I was hoping they’d use this update to upgrade the onboard DAC to one that can handle HiRes over USB-C. Is that difficult to at least bump it from 48 kHz to 96 kHz?

I find it mind-boggling that despite Apple Music having had HiRes music for years, Apple doesn’t sell much in the way of hardware that supports it. Third party external DACs work, but they are not an elegant solution, especially since a lot of them are USB-A.
Why do you want 96 kHz as a delivery format?
 
Upvote
32 (33 / -1)

freakout87

Ars Centurion
393
Subscriptor
With the release of the Neo, you could (almost) get an entire Apple computer for the price of these! Who buys these? I'm no stranger to indulgent tech purchases, but $550 for a pair of wireless headphones in a world where their best-rated competitors go for $400 - $300... well, you'd have to really, really want that Apple connectivity.
 
Upvote
-18 (9 / -27)

KWRussell

Ars Centurion
283
Subscriptor
Also means listening and charging at the same time, main question is how heavy that cable would feel (as a normal
Audio cable is pretty light and supple)
Apple's braided USB cables are nice and light. A wee bit less flexible than my favorite headphone cables, but not so much that they'd be a pain to wear. The only question is the length of the included cable, which Apple doesn't specify. They only say "USB-C Charge Cable", which has me thinking it's only 1 meter.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
Ok better I guess, but it feels odd to see it updated with a 3 year old chip when theres likely a new one thats coming fairly soon?

Having the ability to play lossless is nice i suppose, i personally am to old to hear the difference anymore, but that does probably represent a nice feature

Also means listening and charging at the same time, main question is how heavy that cable would feel (as a normal
Audio cable is pretty light and supple)

Depends on what you're listening to, and how trained your ears are. Lossy audio compression algorithms muck up certain instruments/timbres a lot. My favorite demo is what MP3 does to a reedy and buzzy texture namely bassoon, makes it sound like a clarinet.

Of course...most people usually aren't listening to acoustic instrumentals where such a case matters.
 
Upvote
-14 (4 / -18)
1) What was the point of the Airpods Max 1.2 launch with the same colors as the 2 now

2) Seems like an odd launch, if I read into it it felt like no press were briefed and the only articles when it hit the newsroom were translated, i.e no prewritten scheduled articles. A launch this imminent wasn't in the rumors at all.

Did they change anything but the H2 chip and the accompanying features allowing live translation and all that? No mention of the new low noise mics that allowed the Pro 3's better ANC without a chip change, is the chassis 1:1 the same other than the chip swap?

Smells of chip and ship with all of the new features coming from the new chip, that one day in Tim Apple's office he was like "Good mornang! We sell over the ear headphones? And we're out of 6 year old chips for it you say?"
 
Upvote
-3 (6 / -9)

xyzzy01

Ars Praetorian
485
Subscriptor++
How are these better than a pair of Sony Pro MDR 7506 headphones? In my opinion, those are the gold standard, and only $100.
For most users, these are very different products. The Airpods Max 2 are wireless and they have noise cancelling, spatial audio, and microphones for use in phone calls/meetings.

These Sony headphones are for listening to music, at home, connected to a good sound source.
 
Upvote
36 (36 / 0)
...well, you'd have to really, really want that Apple connectivity.
You do, though. If I were in the market for closed-back over-the-ear wireless headphones I wouldn't hesitate to pay a bit extra for the convenience. It's absolutely worth it in my opinion. But then, I thought I was throwing away $250 buying a pair of AirPods Pro, and they've become indispensable to me. The ease with which they jump from device to device cannot really be overstated.
 
Upvote
31 (32 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Depends on what you're listening to, and how trained your ears are. Lossy audio compression algorithms muck up certain instruments/timbres a lot. My favorite demo is what MP3 does to a reedy and buzzy texture namely bassoon, makes it sound like a clarinet.
That's not a problem with "lossy codecs." That's a problem with MP3.

And yeah, it was a real problem, and still is a real problem...with MP3. Because that came out in 1991.

It's not a problem with AAC or Opus or any of the later-generation psychoacoustic codecs. (And AAC came out in 1997!)

I swear, half the golden-eared audiophiles on the Internet heard a 128kbps MP3 their kid got off of Napster back in 1998, chuckled, shook their heads, went back to their softly-lit, carpeted, wood-paneled basement listening dens, and haven't paid any attention to anything since.
 
Upvote
82 (85 / -3)
You do, though. If I were in the market for closed-back over-the-ear wireless headphones I wouldn't hesitate to pay a bit extra for the convenience. It's absolutely worth it in my opinion. But then, I thought I was throwing away $250 buying a pair of AirPods Pro, and they've become indispensable to me. The ease with which they jump from device to device cannot really be overstated.
The Airpods Pro were the first ear buds I could even tolerate, and they are quite indispensable to me as well.
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)
People love to shit on that case but I like that it protects what needs to be protected without taking up half my backpack.

I don’t know about other people’s bags, but I’m usually “protecting" my AirPods Max from a paperback, a notebook, a sweater, an e-reader and maybe an energy bar. ¯\ _ (ツ) _ /¯

(It does look corny, I’ll grant that, especially with the weird exposed seams all over the back. But I honestly couldn’t care less)
 
Last edited:
Upvote
15 (17 / -2)
I have the original version, and it seems this is the exact same design, which means they are still too heavy. I must have used them 2 or 3 times at most, they are very uncomfortable to me. Maybe I'll try the Sony WH-1000XM6.
Can I have them? :)

I had exactly the same complaint as you when I first got mine. Not just the weight, but also the clamping force that keeps that weight in place. Over time, I honestly just got used to it. Not saying everyone does, but I barely notice anymore after wearing them at least 2000 hours since early 2021. Will not deny they’re heavy, tho!
 
Last edited:
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

Jeff3F

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,762
Subscriptor++
I’m on my third pair of these, since they keep killing themselves with condensation. I do live in a humid state, but get AppleCare if you want these to last.
I got my original APMs on sale and they were great, but they were not repairable when they did break. Disappointing but at least mine lasted for 4 years. $550 is steep but v1 was occasionally discounted $80ish and that was when I bit.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)