The series of nine animated shorts starts streaming on Disney+ on September 22.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
The animation looks fun, but I think Im a little star-wars'd out. Hopefully they can destroy whatever weapon blows up planets this time.
They wouldn't do that plot line again would they?
Of course not! This time it'll be tiny Death Asteroids that blow up moons instead. Totally different.
so: just got an email from Disney Plus here in Canada indicating my monthly cost is going up almost 40%.
I 'cut the cord' to get away from high Cable bills, but at this point streaming services are starting to reach the point of "more expensive than Cable" (multiple teenagers: I am afflicted with multiple streaming services )
guess its time to join the brigade of "subscribe for a month or two and disconnect"
This series looks neat: is the flow of new content from Disney+ enough to justify 40% price bump? I just don't think so.
time for a rotation strategy in streaming
The big part is that they added something called Star, which is basically the Hulu library for Canada, and as a result they increased the monthly rates. That actually happened back in February for new subscribers, but existing subscribers could keep the old rate until August.so: just got an email from Disney Plus here in Canada indicating my monthly cost is going up almost 40%.
I 'cut the cord' to get away from high Cable bills, but at this point streaming services are starting to reach the point of "more expensive than Cable" (multiple teenagers: I am afflicted with multiple streaming services )
guess its time to join the brigade of "subscribe for a month or two and disconnect"
This series looks neat: is the flow of new content from Disney+ enough to justify 40% price bump? I just don't think so.
time for a rotation strategy in streaming
40% bump? Isn't this the mandated all streaming services must pay HST/GST now? So shouldn't be more that 14%
Oh god please no more star wars
How about a Marvel, Star Wars cross over instead?Oh god please no more star wars
Wait... You're saying Star Wars' existence doesn't prevent me from enjoying something else? So, I could go watch that instead of complaining here?Oh god please no more star wars
And that’s bad take #2394…
Seriously…Disney is literally making something for everyone, something for every taste. Even the most jaded can find something to enjoy there.
Looks great, but kinda amused by about "too much CGI" when that guy makes generous use of rotoscoped 3D models/scenes. Computers and 3D modeling have been part of the animator's toolkit for a long time now and can lead to vastly different results under different artists. Can't damn the usage as a whole based on weaker examples.Too much CGI. They should be shooting for TIE Fighter.
Patton Oswalt might have an idea or twenty about a Marvel Star Wars crossoverHow about a Marvel, Star Wars cross over instead?Oh god please no more star wars
OK now I'm going to dig a deep hole and hide in it.
On a more serious note it would have been cool to get Otomo to head the project.
Sure, and Fire and Ice is just a live-action movie!Heh, the Studio Trigger ones look blatantly in their style.
Looks great, but kinda amused by about "too much CGI" when that guy makes generous use of rotoscoped 3D models/scenes. Computers and 3D modeling have been part of the animator's toolkit for a long time now and can lead to vastly different results under different artists. Can't damn the usage as a whole based on weaker examples.Too much CGI. They should be shooting for TIE Fighter.
It's rotoscoping over 3D CGI. Rotoscoping absolutely does get criticism for producing poorer results than traditional, hand drawn animation, though of course there is a wide range of quality.Sure, and Fire and Ice is just a live-action movie!Heh, the Studio Trigger ones look blatantly in their style.
Looks great, but kinda amused by about "too much CGI" when that guy makes generous use of rotoscoped 3D models/scenes. Computers and 3D modeling have been part of the animator's toolkit for a long time now and can lead to vastly different results under different artists. Can't damn the usage as a whole based on weaker examples.Too much CGI. They should be shooting for TIE Fighter.![]()
Yes, rotoscoping is a technique animators have used for over a hundred years. No, that doesn't make TIE Fighter "CGI."
The thing is, as the middle of a trilogy The Last Jedi is a terrible, awful, not enough ways to say how bad it is film. Viewed as a stand alone movie with no preexisting characters, it's a mixed bag with some bad elements and some great ones. So both perspectives are correct, from a certain point of view, but I lean towards the first one, because the middle of a trilogy was its place.yes! Just what we need. More Star Wars flicks with awful storylines so that Disney can make more cash. I wonder if the Death Star blows up in this series.
This is off topic, but Star Wars is a tricky beast to tame. Make something new? "NOT STAR WARSY ENOUGH!" Make something not as new? "IT'S JUST THE SAME thing!" The only modern Star Wars thing that has been pretty universally acclaimed is The Mandalorian (maybe because no Skywalkers?). Star Wars fans are as religious about is as ... well, christians, and about as divided as what counts as "real/good Star Wars". Personally I liked the new trilogy, and especially The Last Jedi. It was wizard.
I hear people say this a lot but I really don't think it's true. The existence of near universally-acclaimed things like The Mandalorian or the Clone Wars animated series shows that pleasing a majority of Star Wars fans isn't impossible. I even see a lot of people who hate the sequel trilogy grudgingly admit that The Last Jedi was the best of the three simply because it tried to be different. Heck, people were even willing to give the copy/paste that was The Force Awakens a pass initially because they were hopeful that it could evolve into something good.
The secret to success in the Star Wars universe is to simply care about Star Wars and try to make something good. Not everyone will like it but they'll acknowledge that you made a good-faith attempt and just wait for someone else to make something they do like. If, on the other hand, you're someone who clearly doesn't give a shit about Star Wars (looking at you, JJ) and is just churning out a turd sandwich to make a quick buck then yes, expect to receive a lot of hate from the fans.
And I know people who truly hates The Last Jedi and think they ruined Star Wars forever. I've heard multiple people start sentences with "I was there when it first came out ... " and their conclusions are wildly different, and all of them claim to be the ones who truly care about Star Wars. So yeah, not impossible to make universally acclaimed stuff, but also really quite hard. Honestly at this point it's almost religion. Star Wars is holy for people and that is really interesting to me.
The big part is that they added something called Star, which is basically the Hulu library for Canada, and as a result they increased the monthly rates. That actually happened back in February for new subscribers, but existing subscribers could keep the old rate until August.so: just got an email from Disney Plus here in Canada indicating my monthly cost is going up almost 40%.
I 'cut the cord' to get away from high Cable bills, but at this point streaming services are starting to reach the point of "more expensive than Cable" (multiple teenagers: I am afflicted with multiple streaming services )
guess its time to join the brigade of "subscribe for a month or two and disconnect"
This series looks neat: is the flow of new content from Disney+ enough to justify 40% price bump? I just don't think so.
time for a rotation strategy in streaming
40% bump? Isn't this the mandated all streaming services must pay HST/GST now? So shouldn't be more that 14%
Some of this looks okay, and some of the features look VERY Anime trope. I'm not very hype for it. :/
The thing is, as the middle of a trilogy The Last Jedi is a terrible, awful, not enough ways to say how bad it is film. Viewed as a stand alone movie with no preexisting characters, it's a mixed bag with some bad elements and some great ones. So both perspectives are correct, from a certain point of view, but I lean towards the first one, because the middle of a trilogy was its place.yes! Just what we need. More Star Wars flicks with awful storylines so that Disney can make more cash. I wonder if the Death Star blows up in this series.
This is off topic, but Star Wars is a tricky beast to tame. Make something new? "NOT STAR WARSY ENOUGH!" Make something not as new? "IT'S JUST THE SAME thing!" The only modern Star Wars thing that has been pretty universally acclaimed is The Mandalorian (maybe because no Skywalkers?). Star Wars fans are as religious about is as ... well, christians, and about as divided as what counts as "real/good Star Wars". Personally I liked the new trilogy, and especially The Last Jedi. It was wizard.
I hear people say this a lot but I really don't think it's true. The existence of near universally-acclaimed things like The Mandalorian or the Clone Wars animated series shows that pleasing a majority of Star Wars fans isn't impossible. I even see a lot of people who hate the sequel trilogy grudgingly admit that The Last Jedi was the best of the three simply because it tried to be different. Heck, people were even willing to give the copy/paste that was The Force Awakens a pass initially because they were hopeful that it could evolve into something good.
The secret to success in the Star Wars universe is to simply care about Star Wars and try to make something good. Not everyone will like it but they'll acknowledge that you made a good-faith attempt and just wait for someone else to make something they do like. If, on the other hand, you're someone who clearly doesn't give a shit about Star Wars (looking at you, JJ) and is just churning out a turd sandwich to make a quick buck then yes, expect to receive a lot of hate from the fans.
And I know people who truly hates The Last Jedi and think they ruined Star Wars forever. I've heard multiple people start sentences with "I was there when it first came out ... " and their conclusions are wildly different, and all of them claim to be the ones who truly care about Star Wars. So yeah, not impossible to make universally acclaimed stuff, but also really quite hard. Honestly at this point it's almost religion. Star Wars is holy for people and that is really interesting to me.
The thing is, as the middle of a trilogy The Last Jedi is a terrible, awful, not enough ways to say how bad it is film. Viewed as a stand alone movie with no preexisting characters, it's a mixed bag with some bad elements and some great ones. So both perspectives are correct, from a certain point of view, but I lean towards the first one, because the middle of a trilogy was its place.yes! Just what we need. More Star Wars flicks with awful storylines so that Disney can make more cash. I wonder if the Death Star blows up in this series.
This is off topic, but Star Wars is a tricky beast to tame. Make something new? "NOT STAR WARSY ENOUGH!" Make something not as new? "IT'S JUST THE SAME thing!" The only modern Star Wars thing that has been pretty universally acclaimed is The Mandalorian (maybe because no Skywalkers?). Star Wars fans are as religious about is as ... well, christians, and about as divided as what counts as "real/good Star Wars". Personally I liked the new trilogy, and especially The Last Jedi. It was wizard.
I hear people say this a lot but I really don't think it's true. The existence of near universally-acclaimed things like The Mandalorian or the Clone Wars animated series shows that pleasing a majority of Star Wars fans isn't impossible. I even see a lot of people who hate the sequel trilogy grudgingly admit that The Last Jedi was the best of the three simply because it tried to be different. Heck, people were even willing to give the copy/paste that was The Force Awakens a pass initially because they were hopeful that it could evolve into something good.
The secret to success in the Star Wars universe is to simply care about Star Wars and try to make something good. Not everyone will like it but they'll acknowledge that you made a good-faith attempt and just wait for someone else to make something they do like. If, on the other hand, you're someone who clearly doesn't give a shit about Star Wars (looking at you, JJ) and is just churning out a turd sandwich to make a quick buck then yes, expect to receive a lot of hate from the fans.
And I know people who truly hates The Last Jedi and think they ruined Star Wars forever. I've heard multiple people start sentences with "I was there when it first came out ... " and their conclusions are wildly different, and all of them claim to be the ones who truly care about Star Wars. So yeah, not impossible to make universally acclaimed stuff, but also really quite hard. Honestly at this point it's almost religion. Star Wars is holy for people and that is really interesting to me.
And here's the thing: you say that as if it's fact, and yet I know old (as in been there from the beginning) hardcore Star Wars fans who think it's the best Star Wars since Empire. And that's my point.
I've got a bad feeling about this.The animation looks fun, but I think Im a little star-wars'd out. Hopefully they can destroy whatever weapon blows up planets this time.
They wouldn't do that plot line again would they?
But given that none of that happened, I think saying TLJ is terrible is a perfectly fair take as the follow-up to The Force Awakens we already had.At the risk of making yet-another-sequel-trilogy-debate-thread, I think the Last Jedi hate comes mostly from it being a non-sequitur in relation to the rest of the trilogy. If The Force Awakens had focused on Luke's attempt and failure to recreate the Jedi order, The Last Jedi were left mostly as-is, and The Rise of Skywalker had been about Rey taking the lessons learned from Luke and succeeding were he failed, I don't think people would hate TLJ nearly as much.