New tools aim at phone snatchers, snooping kids or partners, and cell hijackers.
See full article...
See full article...
Wait. How was this not already the case as soon as screen sharing was implemented?Sharing your screen will also hide OTP notifications, along with usernames, passwords, and credit card numbers.
Is there any small device (that you keep in your pocket) such that the phone will automatically lock itself if the phone isn’t within a few feet of it? Do Apple make anything like that? If such things existed they might help to reduce the number of “grab and run” attacks.
Just checked on my phone and the theft detection and remote lock are available. Fold 5. That is nice - but I wonder how well they work.It's nice that many of these security improvements are actually Google Play Services updates and not just confined to Android 15, since some of us have perfectly functional phones that just happen to no longer be getting new Android versions (Galaxy S10, in my case).
Just tested remote lock - it was quick about 2 seconds. But I can see this feature being miss used since there is no authentication. At least its not a custom lock and regular unlock worked fine.Just checked on my phone and the theft detection and remote lock are available. Fold 5. That is nice - but I wonder how well they work.
This is not restricted to phones you own, put in any number you like and it will try and lock it. Have fun everyone...
http://android.com/lock
In Android, a "Trusted Device" designated by the owner (such as a smartwatch or paired headphones) can unlock a phone by being within Bluetooth range. Ostensibly this means that a phone taken away from its Trusted Device will automatically lock, but all of the documentation I can find is vague on how quickly that will happen. That's probably because Bluetooth range is so variable that there's no way to make any kind of definitive assertion.Is there any small device (that you keep in your pocket) such that the phone will automatically lock itself if the phone isn’t within a few feet of it? Do Apple make anything like that? If such things existed they might help to reduce the number of “grab and run” attacks.
I agree with everything you said. One worry I have would be a denial of service type attack where someone just keeps locking out the device every 5 seconds or something so that you can't use your device.As this is the same lock that would happen after a timeout or when you hit the power button I don't think that's a major issue. If someone does this to your phone you just unlock it like normal with your pin/passcode/biometrics etc. This needs to be quick and easy to do when your phone is actually stolen so a full Gmail account login wouldn't really work especially for account with Advanced Protection Program enabled where you would need a security key to log in. That's probably also why it's tied to phone number and not an email address or login. Quick and easy to give someone else to fill in and lock your phone.
Unlocked here just means you don't need to auth (pin, fingerprint, whatever) to access the phone. If you lose connection to the trusted device, I don't believe it drops you to the lockscreen. So if it's snagged while you're using it, it'll stay unlocked.In Android, a "Trusted Device" designated by the owner (such as a smartwatch or paired headphones) can unlock a phone by being within Bluetooth range. Ostensibly this means that a phone taken away from its Trusted Device will automatically lock, but all of the documentation I can find is vague on how quickly that will happen. That's probably because Bluetooth range is so variable that there's no way to make any kind of definitive assertion.
tl;dr -- Such a thing does exist, but it's probably not as reliable as the security features described in the article.
Under the setting, it says that remote lock is usable up to twice a day, so Google already thought of that.I agree with everything you said. One worry I have would be a denial of service type attack where someone just keeps locking out the device every 5 seconds or something so that you can't use your device.
That's solvable by putting a timeout on it. If someone unlocks the phone you just locked it's unlikely they can't do it again, so it kinda loses it's effectiveness in a near term situation. That said, for a targeted attack the "thief" would just lock your phone, let you unlock it and then grab and go, so I don't know what a good answer is. Maybe we assume that level of targeting is sufficiently rare in the scope of that harassing lockouts.
Narrator voice : he meant Tinder and Grindr.sensitive apps, like banking and shopping apps, or hide other apps for whatever reason.
I hope theft detection lock will keep the phone recording in the case of a cop yanking a bystander's phone out of their hands to stop them recording police brutality.
Any clear walk through for how offline lock works? It says “when a thief has your phone offline for a while” but how does it know I’m not just in airplane mode (and/or beyond cell service) while backcountry camping?
I agree with everything you said. One worry I have would be a denial of service type attack where someone just keeps locking out the device every 5 seconds or something so that you can't use your device.
That's solvable by putting a timeout on it. If someone unlocks the phone you just locked it's unlikely they can't do it again, so it kinda loses it's effectiveness in a near term situation. That said, for a targeted attack the "thief" would just lock your phone, let you unlock it and then grab and go, so I don't know what a good answer is. Maybe we assume that level of targeting is sufficiently rare in the scope of that harassing lockouts.
If it exists in India before Android 15, then presumably it doesn't require Android 15.They STILL haven't rolled out dual sim RCS support worldwide, India only. Thought for sure it'd be in 15 finally.
There is a note under the Remote Lock activation slider:This is not restricted to phones you own, put in any number you like and it will try and lock it. Have fun everyone...
http://android.com/lock
Exactly. Was hoping they'd use 15's release as an excuse to roll it out to everyone. Especially since they've been pushing for RCS to be used everywhere.If it exists in India before Android 15, then presumably it doesn't require Android 15.