Amazon recently locked some of Alexa's Guard security features behind a paywall.
See full article...
See full article...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA NO.Amazon wants to charge a subscription fee for Alexa eventually
Not explicit in The Fine Demo is that you will have to have all of your house windows, doors and whatnot tied to Alexa, err Amazon.Like I'm going to put physical security into the digital realm. They're literally insane. That screenshot is just ludicrous.
I suspect that someday a company will come along and offer products and service with real privacy and trust. They're going to make a fortune.I use the Alexa I was gifted as a speaker. That's it. There's nothing else I really want it to do that I trust.
I was also given one. This is the only gift in my memory where I did decline (as politely as I could). Absolutely never having that in my house. Never ever.I use the Alexa I was gifted as a speaker. That's it. There's nothing else I really want it to do that I trust.
The universal experience with all of these digital assistants is they have decayed in functionality and gotten notably worse over time.
Amazon is out of their damn minds if they think people are going to shell out another subscription fee to keep using them.
That sounds reasonable except for how they're harvesting your data and using it for their profit. They should be paying YOU.As someone with a bunch of Alexa's in my house, I'm actually fine with them charging for it, as it allows things to be more sustainable. Even the current feature set of Alexa is clearly massively expensive to run, and buying a (usually) cheap piece of hardware at-cost, shouldn't necessarily guarantee me that they will pay server fees for my usage forever.
When first hearing about their financial issues, my initial thought was that they should have launched Alexa with a small fee, like $2-3 a month, but waive that for anyone with Prime. It wouldn't really bring in much extra revenue, but would give another hook into Prime, which they are always looking for. This would make sense for the current feature set.
Now, once you get into generative AI, the server cost sky-rockets upwards, and there would be no reasonable way to do it without charging. And again, if you actually want to use Alexa for that type of stuff (which I don't), then charging for it is perfectly reasonable, and looking at other such services, would probably put it at close to $20-30 a month. I don't see it as actually being a good value, but if someone wants it, I don't think that type of price would be un-fair, based on the cost to run it.
Basically, everyone scoffs at being charged for services they use, but I think it's required to keep a business sustainable, without the entire world being based off of "free" services paid for by nothing but ads and personal data.
I was going to say the same.Hahahahahahaha. Oh wait you're serious. Let me laugh even harder. AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Hell, there’s a genuine use-case for AI in Microsoft Office, where people can actually use help with writing
My privacy isn't for sale at any price. Leave me TFA.That sounds reasonable except for how they're harvesting your data and using it for their profit. They should be paying YOU.
Like I'm going to put physical security into the digital realm. They're literally insane. That screenshot is just ludicrous.
These features included the ability to have a back-and-forth discussion with Alexa showcasing its own "opinions," like a favorite sports team.
Dumpster fire image more appropriate.Insert Image Of Amazon Echo in a Trash Can
Accept and keep in box and regift =)I was also given one. This is the only gift in my memory where I did decline (as politely as I could). Absolutely never having that in my house. Never ever.
I'd be happy to have a "conversation" with a computer that was actually smart. From sci-fi this would be the Enterprise computer from TNG. ChatGPT is actually eerily similar and people don't mind having a "conversation" with that. People actually get something out of the interactions, they yield useful information.The voice assistant ‘market‘ shows (again) that real life doesn’t work like sci-fi. People don’t really want to have conversations with computers.