"It'll be very hard for anyone to survive in the US market," Chinese group says.
See full article...
See full article...
I mean, so is psychology and philosophy, and those are valid fields of study. But economics does way better explaining than it does predicting, and it has a tendency to vastly overestimate the utility of its models on the grounds that they're math and math is objective and precise, never mind that their assumptions are a basket case.Economics is a real field. It's just based on a fuzzy foundation: people's behavior.
That being said, there is no "Nobel Prize in Economics". There is a "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences".
As someone with a higher ed degree in philosophy I'd have to argue with the concept that it's a valid field of study. /sI mean, so is psychology and philosophy, and those are valid fields of study. But economics does way better explaining than it does predicting, and it has a tendency to vastly overestimate the utility of its models on the grounds that they're math and math is objective and precise, never mind that their assumptions are a basket case.
That is true but most news outlets call it a 'Nobel Prize' (like the 'Nobel Peace Prize').Economics is a real field. It's just based on a fuzzy foundation: people's behavior.
That being said, there is no "Nobel Prize in Economics". There is a "Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences".
Replace the stock ticker in Times Square with a tariff ticker.
Indeed, I'm seeing the same thing. Stuff that was previously "currently not available in your country" is now available at discounted rates.I'm already seeing quite a few discounted items from my Amazon wishlist in the past couple of days, they must be pushing to get rid of stock to the rest of the world, now that it's harder to sell to the US.
Well, not really. The problem is that economics is at about the stage physics was at the start of the 19th century.The Nobel Prize in Economics has always annoyed me. Might as well have a Nobel Prize in Aromatherapy.
Where is Harry Seldon when we need him?Well, not really. The problem is that economics is at about the stage physics was at the start of the 19th century.
Only at the start of the 19th century people weren't trying to build military fighter jets with integrated avionics, whereas banks and governments today are trying to do the equivalent with the economic tools available.
Or to put it another way, "Ugg invent wheel. Now Ugg start business, call it Porsche."
If Trump doesn't back down on them and especially if he keeps adding more and more to them¹ you can also add "Goodbye Black Friday" this year. Most of those special deals Walmart, Target, etc. have for Black Friday each year come from China.Goodbye electronics repairability, goodbye retro handheld hobby.
Thanks Trumpers, you got rid of the pronouns in the bio and all it cost was a big hit to standard of living and a giant tax hike. I said it before, and I'll repeat it, you're the best.
One of my friends has the same for his dog! It was memorable enough that I took a picture with my phone of the harness and logo in case I ever need it for a meme.Ha, the dog harness my wife bought is this brand. I can't help but call it out every time I see it.
Everyone here is sort of celebrating the fact that these Chinese sellers won't sell on Amazon anymore, which will result in less junk on Amazon. Let's not forget though, that it's going to raise the price for the "name brand" stuff as well, especially in electronics. It's not like these tariffs only target the cheaply made stuff. I doubt there is very little on Amazon that doesn't have parts or manufacturing that deal with China, and, if not, the 10% across the board tariff is still in place.
I enjoyed those along with BTF Lighting's LED strips and Waveshare's LCD displays for various hobby-grade electronics projects.I'll miss Anker devices.
Feel free to disagree with me, but given how often here where I am, I see common-house-use-Chinese-garbage-tier-quality-item in a local store for $10 and then see on Amazon/AliExpress/Temu/other exactly the same one for $1 - yes, the actual scam stuff is really bad for people, considering how many people rely on super-cheap Chinese stuff to make it safely to the end of the month without destroying their bank account, I think this will do significantly more harm than good.
China already has a giant cultural chip on its shoulder about getting bullied economically by Western powers. Most of us don't know the first fucking thing about the Boxer Rebellion and the foreign concessions and treaty ports and so on, but they have not forgotten, and their rise as a great power is in large part motivated by "no other nation will ever do that to us again, ever." Face is a big part of this, no doubt, but this is about national self-image, at this point, and not without historic justification.If Trump doesn't back down on them and especially if he keeps adding more and more to them¹ you can also add "Goodbye Black Friday" this year. Most of those special deals Walmart, Target, etc. have for Black Friday each year come from China.
And pretty soon you can also say "Goodbye Dollar Tree," since they've reported in the past that between 41% to 43% of their products are from China. (Same will likely happen to Dollar General as well.)
¹ It's clear Trump thinks a big enough number will get China to back down, but I doubt even 1,000,000% tariffs would do that. In fact the higher they go, the more China's going to dig in its heels and refuse to budge. It's probably already about saving face for them and they aren't going to lose face just because Trump is throwing a tantrum.
I thought it had been stated that the tariffs were based on country of manufacture, not country of export.Gonna miss LI2HLSU4TECH, but maybe XIZNYLEYTEK can start shipping from somewhere else and stick around.
Nope, because most listings for MAGA hats are for hats made in China and it's questionable that Trump's official ones are actually made in the US. At best they're stitched together in the US from entirely imported materials.If Donny is cleaning up the amazon flea market minefield, does that mean i need to find a red hat?
I used to think this way. But, then I realized two things:
1. The ruling class is us. Just the group of us that happen to control material wealth at the moment. For all the blather about rising inquality, that comes and goes, just like money.
2. We used to have jobs provided by those evil oppressors, but they moved them overseas because the incentives of free trade favor that. Putting up barriers incentivizes having the jobs be domestic instead. The people who immediately counter by saying "well robots" miss the point. There will always be more jobs. The question is who is the most economic employee -- where that person is. Barriers make it more desirable to have that person be domestic.
The left's propaganda has been better for so long that in circles like Ars, it's become accepted wisdom. This has happened while the whole country's working population has been hollowed out. The left is simply wrong and won't admit it, and so are the technocrats here.
The ‘single most dangerous enemy’ you have is the criminal in the Oval Office.
You got convinced of two things that actively work against your interests, by people whose interests are served by your believing this bullshit.I used to think this way. But, then I realized two things:
1. The ruling class is us. Just the group of us that happen to control material wealth at the moment. For all the blather about rising inquality, that comes and goes, just like money.
2. We used to have jobs provided by those evil oppressors, but they moved them overseas because the incentives of free trade favor that. Putting up barriers incentivizes having the jobs be domestic instead. The people who immediately counter by saying "well robots" miss the point. There will always be more jobs. The question is who is the most economic employee -- where that person is. Barriers make it more desirable to have that person be domestic.
The left's propaganda has been better for so long that in circles like Ars, it's become accepted wisdom. This has happened while the whole country's working population has been hollowed out. The left is simply wrong and won't admit it, and so are the technocrats here.
Yep. Silver linings are good and all that, but there is a cloud.
Mental exercises--name some companies on Amazon that won't be affected by tariffs, particularly in the tech space.
Elon?The ‘single most dangerous enemy’ you have is the criminal in the Oval Office.
Well, no. Because the $3 marginal cost to make the item in China doesn't pay the people who ship it, doesn't pay your US warehouse, doesn't pay your US designers or your US salespeople, and all those people need to eat. For a lot of companies in this space their true profit after they pay people is closer to 10%. Few of them were prepared to have huge new bills on products already ordered and even in some cases on the ocean when these tariffs dropped."Building blocks for children that sell on Amazon for $20 that cost his company $3 to produce would now cost $7 including the tariff. Maintaining margins would require raising the price by at least 20 percent, and prices for higher-cost toys might see 50 percent increases, he said," according to Reuters. Miller said that if the tariffs aren't changed, "manufacturing that serves the US will have to be transferred to other countries like Vietnam or Mexico."
2 things here. First, your profit margins shrunk from 85% to 65%...cry me a fucking river. Second, a lot of the proposed benefit to higher tariffs is to bring manufacturing back to the USA, and it doesn't look like that's a realistic option when you can get things manufactured almost anywhere else for less.
Don't forget RABBITGOO. Because when you need window film, buy from RABBITGOO.
(sarcasm. But also true!)
Alas, a lot of books are printed in China, it turns out.Book publishers?
(Just guessing - for all I know, the paper is imported from Canada...)
It absolutely the fuck is not.I used to think this way. But, then I realized two things:
1. The ruling class is us.
No, they moved them overseas for profit.2. We used to have jobs provided by those evil oppressors, but they moved them overseas because the incentives of free trade favor that.
No. You've just shown your bias.The left's propaganda
No, they're not.The left is simply wrong
Except repair parts are already going up and price and will be just as fucked. Guess where all the parts are made? Definitely not the US of Assholes!Silver lining (because I have to find the silver lining or it's too depressing): tariff's hitting goods that hard will at least pull more people into repair/repurpose type communities, and also 2nd hand which is a boon for the environment.
Slim silver lining overall, but it's there.
And where are you going to buy the parts for repairs?Silver lining (because I have to find the silver lining or it's too depressing): tariff's hitting goods that hard will at least pull more people into repair/repurpose type communities, and also 2nd hand which is a boon for the environment.
... made by Chinese companies - Creality and Elegoo
And besides if all the Chinese sellers leave Amazon there will be little to nothing left. All the reputable non Chinese brands left Amazon ages ago. Amazon is literally 90% Chinese direct oem stuff. It's nearly impossible to find anything else.Everyone here is sort of celebrating the fact that these Chinese sellers won't sell on Amazon anymore, which will result in less junk on Amazon. Let's not forget though, that it's going to raise the price for the "name brand" stuff as well, especially in electronics. It's not like these tariffs only target the cheaply made stuff. I doubt there is very little on Amazon that doesn't have parts or manufacturing that deal with China, and, if not, the 10% across the board tariff is still in place.
Reminds me of the joke:Economics is a complex subject and very difficult to learn about on a good day. People get degrees in it, spend their lives researching it, and still get stuff wrong about it-- constantly.
That's people who are interested or passionate about the subject. Your average voter? Good lord is it frustrating watching people suddenly trying to pretend they're conversant in one of the most complex disciplines on the planet.
One of my econ professors once said that if anyone confidently asserts anything after the sentence "I'm an economist", you should stop listening to them immediately. They could be right, wrong, or anything inbetween, but they almost certainly have no idea what they're talking about.
I get that it's super frustrating but there's a reason that people who actually know things about the topic couch their language carefully, hedge their bets, all the annoying things that make it hard to get a straight answer out of someone. It's because there usually isn't one.
So to circle all the way back around: we're getting the results of economic policies made by idiots who were voted in by idiots. Love this for all of us.
Well, not really. The problem is that economics is at about the stage physics was at the start of the 19th century.
Only at the start of the 19th century people weren't trying to build military fighter jets with integrated avionics, whereas banks and governments today are trying to do the equivalent with the economic tools available.
Or to put it another way, "Ugg invent wheel. Now Ugg start business, call it Porsche."
Gonna miss LI2HLSU4TECH, but maybe XIZNYLEYTEK can start shipping from somewhere else and stick around.
The silver lining here is that if Chinese sellers pull out of Amazon, all the ripoff low-quality products by companies like ZVOWFRT and LZFDCQQ will go away. Yes, cheap stuff can be good, but we also all know how much absolute crap is shoveled onto Amazon by whack-a-mole companies selling products like "power bill savers" that contain a fake capacitor made of sand.
On the flipside those products will probably just pivot to scambaity sites where they can charge the higher prices to begin with. Krazy Ken is probably gearing up for a wild year.
Yeah, look up homo economicus.I mean, so is psychology and philosophy, and those are valid fields of study. But economics does way better explaining than it does predicting, and it has a tendency to vastly overestimate the utility of its models on the grounds that they're math and math is objective and precise, never mind that their assumptions are a basket case.
Plus, domestically produced items that have only Chinese competitors will raise prices by the same amount as the Chinese. There is no reason for them not to.Everyone here is sort of celebrating the fact that these Chinese sellers won't sell on Amazon anymore, which will result in less junk on Amazon. Let's not forget though, that it's going to raise the price for the "name brand" stuff as well, especially in electronics. It's not like these tariffs only target the cheaply made stuff. I doubt there is very little on Amazon that doesn't have parts or manufacturing that deal with China, and, if not, the 10% across the board tariff is still in place.