Scientists hope to collect close-up data about comet right up until the very end.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
The mission site explains that it will try to land it at half the speed of the lander.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468523#p31468523:am03cjzc said:Electrostatus[/url]":am03cjzc]Why crash into it? Why not try a soft landing? Or would a soft landing cause it to bounce like the Philae lander did?
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468945#p31468945:20xxedad said:zAmboni[/url]":20xxedad][url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468655#p31468655:20xxedad said:vnangia[/url]":20xxedad]Now at a distance of more than 850 million km from the Sun, Rosetta's two solar arrays cannot collect enough power
I'm confused by this 850 million KM number. That would suggest the comet, which has an aphelion of 5.69AU (about 850 million KM) is already on its way back towards perihelion and sunlight.
IIRC Rosetta entered orbit around 67P at 3.6AU, so it should be at least able to remain powered up that far.
yea Max distance is 850 million km. Right now it is around 495 million km from the Sun. http://sci.esa.int/where_is_rosetta/
I don't blame them for doing the crash. I just played around with their animation linked above. It would take Rosetta something like 3 years to get back within range for the panels to work again. That's quite a long time to spend waiting (and using resources to keep ppl around). Get some more science with the crash and the move on to the next big project!
Should have named it after a dinosaur.[url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468517#p31468517:1p82bm8m said:GreyAreaUk[/url]":1p82bm8m]"You've been crashing into us for billions of years so LET'S SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT!!!"
[url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31473121#p31473121:1ag6q50b said:sheepless[/url]":1ag6q50b]Should have named it after a dinosaur.[url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468517#p31468517:1ag6q50b said:GreyAreaUk[/url]":1ag6q50b]"You've been crashing into us for billions of years so LET'S SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT!!!"
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31469025#p31469025:1vybcyg8 said:Shlazzargh[/url]":1vybcyg8]thousands of years from now: A family of minors is working on breaking up a small, oddly shaped comet ... suddenly *SCREEEEETCH -- Ting!* ... "Dagnabit Clem, did you break another bit!?" "Awe, gee, sorry pa! It was a 'nother durned spacecraft buried in a comet"
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468589#p31468589:1phqab8v said:TBoneT[/url]":1phqab8v]I don't think they could manage it. Even the hardware they built specifically to land on the comet failed.[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468523#p31468523:1phqab8v said:Electrostatus[/url]":1phqab8v]Why crash into it? Why not try a soft landing? Or would a soft landing cause it to bounce like the Philae lander did?
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31468713#p31468713:2q4ui3y5 said:ninjakid[/url]":2q4ui3y5]I was imagining Rosetta slamming into it high speed going out in a blaze of glory before I read the ESA's press release.
Googles 50cm/s to mphBroadly speaking, however, it is expected that impact will take place at about 50 cm/s, roughly half the landing speed of Philae in November 2014.
1.11847 mph
Oh okay
Also they can't send any data after impact regardless of what happens.
Commands uploaded in the days before will automatically ensure that the transmitter as well as all attitude and orbit control units and instruments are switched off upon impact, to fulfill spacecraft disposal requirements.
In any case, Rosetta’s high-gain antenna will very likely no longer be pointing towards Earth following impact, making any potential communications virtually impossible.