Fleets of laptops run from US residences gave appearance workers were in the US.
See full article...
See full article...
The campaigns, which ramped up nearly five years ago, aim to steal millions of dollars in job revenue and cryptocurrencies to fund North Korean weapons programs.
It's still fraud - wire fraud, identity fraud - maybe some tax crime. Especially the people in the US facilitating things.Not that I condone this but I'm wondering is it stealing if they worked for it? Apparently not all of them engaged in hacking.
Humans are weird like that, we regularly compartmentalize choices in a way that obscures the true risk/reward ratio.It's always surprising to me how little money will convince people to participate in major crimes.
...defendants’ fraudulent employment schemes impacted more than 136 U.S. victim companies...
So, 137 companies? 19 people? I guess they may mean "at least 18 persons that we know about", but it's a strange way of saying it....and compromised the identities of more than 18 U.S. persons.
You should check out how much money gets USA politicians to do the same, though it’s legal for them thanks to the Supreme Court of USA.It's always surprising to me how little money will convince people to participate in major crimes.
lol — the scale of the crime here is too small potatoes. Like my grandpa sagely advised: Don’t steal, but if you do steal, steal big. When you steal big you can launder the assets in schemes and financial shenanigans that shield a big chunk from disgorgementIf they are Trumpers they will be out by Xmas, Trump loves to exonerate white collar Trump scumbags. He loves scammers and fraudsters. But he is a man that respects the laws and our judiciary system.
Really?Only $2.2 million in revenue generate for the DPRK regime? Looks like a small operation, not likely to fund many weapons.
You should see the MLB pitchers who just gave up 8 figure salaries and probably their freedom for $5000 a pitch.It's always surprising to me how little money will convince people to participate in major crimes.
Fraud involves depriving a rightful owner of something via deception, and theft is on that naughty list. Burglary and robbery are also different crimes usually involving "stealing" something.Not that I condone this but I'm wondering is it stealing if they worked for it? Apparently not all of them engaged in hacking.
Literally had this on while I read this post. Trevor May puts out good shit!You should see the MLB pitchers who just gave up 8 figure salaries and probably their freedom for $5000 a pitch.
So, 137 companies? 19 people? I guess they may mean "at least 18 persons that we know about", but it's a strange way of saying it.
Not that I condone this but I'm wondering is it stealing if they worked for it? Apparently not all of them engaged in hacking.
I am pretty sure they contact you. And not like "this is Han Kim Dong from DPRK, would you like to undermine your country?" but more like middlemen, phrasing it as helping people out and make some bucks on the side while doing this.How do you even contact the DPRK to even get this started.
I feel like this is the real reason so many companies have leaned hard into Return to Office.
Both are valid. But as stated by the internet, "pleaded" is more formal.Isn't the past tense of plead "pled", not pleaded?
Isn't the past tense of plead "pled", not pleaded?
Also "North APT38" should maybe just be APT38
Yep, like:I am pretty sure they contact you. And not like "this is Han Kim Dong from DPRK, would you like to undermine your country?" but more like middlemen, phrasing it as helping people out and make some bucks on the side while doing this.
Assistant need for a fully work from home business to earn $$$. All it requires is for you to plug in a couple of laptops1
1. And be a traitor to your country
I can only assume that this is why they needed actual human liaisons in the US to pull it off. It mentioned that a couple of them went in for drug testing, etc. That said, I do share your incredulity. As others have pointed out, such a small payout for such a life-altering crime.I am amazed that companies can hire someone and not even know who they are and what country they live in. Contractors maybe, but employees?
The whole point of the scheme that these people were convicted of was to provide a plausible point of contact inside the US, and help obscure the identities of the workers being employed. And the workers had a nation state assisting them behind the scenes that possibly could have provided "genuine" government issued photo IDs and/or SSN (although one of the convicted was charged with identity theft).I am amazed that companies can hire someone and not even know who they are and what country they live in. Contractors maybe, but employees?
The networks and IT systems of all of the companies that employed these NK IT workers are now likely to be compromised. The NKs may not even have done anything bad yet, and simply injected fake users that they could use as a backdoor at a later date. In cleaning up after the fact, I'm not even sure you could prove that you fully purged your systems of any NK work.Also curious as to whether any of them also stole sensitive data, placed malware in their employers’ networks, etc.
Seems like a way to potentially do that while also making some bucks.
that the FBI seized in March from North APT38 actors
Stealing/compromising the identities of US citizens and getting access to dozens of potentially sensitive companies' internal docs/data is the real prize. This could just be a test or a decentralized pod. There could be a hundred other pods of 3-5 people orchestrating the same scheme out there still operating, for all we know (unlikely, but still). Then we'd be talking about hundreds of US citizens' identities, hundreds of companies, and potentially billions of dollars.Only $2.2 million in revenue generate for the DPRK regime? Looks like a small operation, not likely to fund many weapons.
Makes me wonder if that's how some of the endless "make money easy at home with your computer" scams might go. I have always seen those and immediately think "easy money = too good to be true = scam"I am pretty sure they contact you. And not like "this is Han Kim Dong from DPRK, would you like to undermine your country?" but more like middlemen, phrasing it as helping people out and make some bucks on the side while doing this.
Having volunteered to help people at the edges of society, some of whom are months behind on rent, utilities, and trying to figure out how to eat day to day. A couple of hundred dollars can suddenly look like a massive windfall when your stomach is eating you from the inside.It's always surprising to me how little money will convince people to participate in major crimes.
It's always surprising to me how little money will convince people to participate in major crimes.
You should check out how much money gets USA politicians to do the same, though it’s legal for them thanks to the Supreme Court of USA.
Right, the DPRK just randomly sought out an active member of the US military. Just a typical cold call.I am pretty sure they contact you. And not like "this is Han Kim Dong from DPRK, would you like to undermine your country?" but more like middlemen, phrasing it as helping people out and make some bucks on the side while doing this.