probably but also:So go and buy a Honda Civic Si (or Hybrid) and call it a day?
228hp is 170kW, so that looks like a typo on the kW side.228hp / 270kW , those numbers do not maek sense.
228kW are about 310Hp
270HP are a little less than 200kW![]()
Right, forgot to try that conversion!228hp is 170kW, so that looks like a typo on the kW side.
The Civic Si remains unbeaten as The Perfect Car.So go and buy a Honda Civic Si (or Hybrid) and call it a day?
Out of curiosity, are the GLI's on independent or beam rear axles for this generation? Unfortunately, VW's level of investment in the Jetta really is made evident by not bothering to evict the capacitive controls.
On a side note, I feel like I'm noticing Ars's automotive reviews taking on a slightly spicier tone lately. I think I like it, particularly the mild-but-present enthusiast bent. Maybe I'm imagining things though.
I cross shopped the Civic Si and the GLI, I tote a family around so the cavernous trunk and backseat won me over.TheCivic SiFIT remains unbeaten as The Perfect Car.
You’ve unintentionally provided the best commentary on the state of manual transmissions. They have become so rare that some people don’t even associate the word manual with a car anymore.Headline needs to be more descriptive. When I read the subtitle (Save the Manuals) my first thought was that instead of providing printed owners manuals, they were now only available online.
Maybe 'manual shift' would have been clearer?
There's a lot to be said for that.That was a complaint I had with the manual in the GTI as well - the gear ratios were super tall in 1st and 2nd which made it a little less fun to wring out compared to shorter, tighter gear ratios in the Golf R. I think they did that because it means one less shift to 60 (so faster 0-60 times) and you can keep revs lower in higher gear for efficiency reasons. As for the complaint about the gearbox itself, I honestly don’t get it - its not the sportiest gearbox I’ve had, but its not mush - gear changes are pretty direct, i don’t think the throws are that bad, but I usually put a short shifter on my cars anyway, and this might sound dumb, but its incredibly forgiving and easy to drive in traffic. The clutch is light, the torque band is pretty flat and wide, its hard to lug, and outside of it being close to the limit on torque (if you tune, plan for a sportier clutch replacement), its good. I much prefer it to the WRX, Elantra N, older BMWs, and at least when it was still around, the Focus ST. I can see an argument for the Elantra N over the GLI, but I don’t see the same for the Civic SI. The SI is significantly slower and its better than the prior gen, but a ton of rev overhang if you’re beating on the gearbox. I don’t think with modern emission requirements you can do much to fix that (maybe an electric turbo). I recommend the GLI to anyone who wants a sporty sedan that decently sized - its affordable, has some decent electronics, and with summer tires it can handle well.
I cross shopped the Civic Si and the GLI, I tote a family around so the cavernous trunk and backseat won me over.
My son has a Fit, that thing is so good in it's own way.
/me looks at his MK 6 and the headliner that detached itself from the roof over the back seat two days agoI've got a MK7.5 GLI, same drivetrain. The 1-3 gears are pretty tall, which makes it harder to stoplight race but 4-6 work pretty well on the highway.
Not sure about the new fascia, seems a little too rounded-off to me. But, mine is getting up there in years and miles and it's still a contender for my next ride.
No mention of VW's plummeting quality and reliability?
I had a Jetta back when they stuffed VR6's in them but won't touch VW today.
VW said they were bringing back buttons for HVAC 3 years ago.
2025 EU Spec VWs have buttons for HVAC.
North American cars do not.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. EU spec VWs get dual injection which prevents carbon buildup. I would love to see Ars cover the differences between NA and EU VWs. It's shocking and depressive how much more poorly VW treats NA.
Which strikes me as bullshit; the GTI is a well-sorted, great driving sport compact right off the dealer lot. This is a solved problem in VW-land. There is no reason for this to be any less sorted than the GTI.The 2025 Jetta GLI certainly possesses sporty aspirations, but a few things hold it back from being the complete package that its Golf GTI stablemate is.
Whatever fun is gleaned from the stick, it would seem to me the feel and huge gaps would sap it. I know car guys love them some manuals, but I've driven extremely good manuals and very mediocre ones, and the mediocre ones did not offer any more fun than a DSG.Although the Golf GTI no longer offers a manual, the GLI's 6-speed transmission disappoints both in feel and performance, with huge gaps between cogs. Of course, this malady could be overcome by ordering a DSG automatic GLI, but then any fun gleaned by rowing your gears is also lost.
What, besides personal preference, would make an American buyer want a small car because it's a small car? There's no incentive to avoid heavy taxes on larger vehicles or larger displacements, there are precious few urban environments a Golf could snake through and a Jetta couldn't, and parking is ubiquitous.Don't they all treat Euro different?
Ford/GM make good small cars over there right? Not here.
It's the issue that Americans will not buy nice small cars; they'd rather get a bigger car even if it's not as nice for the same price. It's all size here and no sizzle.
I feel like this is half-assed enough, and there's enough really good competition, that I couldn't tell anyone to buy this over a Civic Si or Hybrid, or even an Elantra N.So go and buy a Honda Civic Si (or Hybrid) and call it a day?
Out of curiosity, are the GLI's on independent or beam rear axles for this generation? Unfortunately, VW's level of investment in the Jetta really is made evident by not bothering to evict the capacitive controls.
On a side note, I feel like I'm noticing Ars's automotive reviews taking on a slightly spicier tone lately. I think I like it, particularly the mild-but-present enthusiast bent. Maybe I'm imagining things though.
VW's reliability and quality is not lower now than it was in the MKIV days, homie.No mention of VW's plummeting quality and reliability?
I had a Jetta back when they stuffed VR6's in them but won't touch VW today.
As a 2022 Si owner, I second your motion.So go and buy a Honda Civic Si (or Hybrid) and call it a day?
Out of curiosity, are the GLI's on independent or beam rear axles for this generation? Unfortunately, VW's level of investment in the Jetta really is made evident by not bothering to evict the capacitive controls.
On a side note, I feel like I'm noticing Ars's automotive reviews taking on a slightly spicier tone lately. I think I like it, particularly the mild-but-present enthusiast bent. Maybe I'm imagining things though.
I had a new MKIV back in the day. The couple problems I remember having were the sunroof not closing and the turbo to intercooler hose popping off on one end. I do remember reading reports of plastic power window gears breaking, but I never had that problem.VW's reliability and quality is not lower now than it was in the MKIV days, homie.
I beg to differ. The Elantra N fits in the same GLI space while the Si is less powerful. The 'stang and WRX are much less practical than the Si, GLI, or N.probably but also:
or Elantra N
or Mustang Ecoboost (let me explain)
or Subaru WRX
They're all surprisingly in the same sub $35K MSRP range
I suspect you're right about 1 less shift to 60. But it also reminds me of the "EPA" transmission I had in my 81 Rabbit diesel. The 4-speed I had used the same stump-puller 1st as the 5-sp (which carried a significant upcharge that I should have found the money for), and 4th in my car was actually slightly higher than 5th. With the other 2 gears splitting the range the 5-sp had 3 in, the gaps were pretty huge.That was a complaint I had with the manual in the GTI as well - the gear ratios were super tall in 1st and 2nd which made it a little less fun to wring out compared to shorter, tighter gear ratios in the Golf R. I think they did that because it means one less shift to 60 (so faster 0-60 times) and you can keep revs lower in higher gear for efficiency reasons. As for the complaint about the gearbox itself, I honestly don’t get it - its not the sportiest gearbox I’ve had, but its not mush - gear changes are pretty direct, i don’t think the throws are that bad, but I usually put a short shifter on my cars anyway, and this might sound dumb, but its incredibly forgiving and easy to drive in traffic. The clutch is light, the torque band is pretty flat and wide, its hard to lug, and outside of it being close to the limit on torque (if you tune, plan for a sportier clutch replacement), its good. I much prefer it to the WRX, Elantra N, older BMWs, and at least when it was still around, the Focus ST. I can see an argument for the Elantra N over the GLI, but I don’t see the same for the Civic SI. The SI is significantly slower and its better than the prior gen, but a ton of rev overhang if you’re beating on the gearbox. I don’t think with modern emission requirements you can do much to fix that (maybe an electric turbo). I recommend the GLI to anyone who wants a sporty sedan that decently sized - its affordable, has some decent electronics, and with summer tires it can handle well.
the GLI's 6-speed transmission disappoints both in feel and performance, with huge gaps between cogs
I cried into my whiskey when Honda stopped making the Fit. When I finally got one (manual, thank you very much) I can't imagine giving it up. Another inch of ground clearance would be good for winter, but that thing is incredibly awesome for everything.My son has a Fit, that thing is so good in it's own way.
Indeed, see "Subaru Crosstrek" - instead of offering a manual now, they have "Sport" with a 2.5L (last manual had 2.0) engine and CVT.With that gearbox, is VW trying to provide themselves cover to drop the manual entirely?
If they make the next GLI auto-only they can point to the 0.1% take rate on manuals from this generation and say "it just didn't make sense, plus the DSG is so much faster anyway*".
Between this and yesterday's Miata RF review, it seems like we really can't have nice things!
*Because we geared the manual badly.
Now in its fourth turbocharged generation, it develops a healthy 228 hp (170 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) of torque,