Welcome. It's very Apple to give every feature a special name. Some of the classic features that make window management a breeze (for me) are Exposé, Mission Control, and Spaces. Rather than try to describe them, it's better for you to search YouTube to explore them. New as of last year is Stage Manager, which hasn't caught on with me personally. Then there are unnamed system-wide keyboard shortcuts for switching among open apps (command-tab, which is very powerful when combined with other easy to use keys or mouse movement) and command-tilde for switching between windows in the same app.I’m a newcomer to Mac OS and I think I need some tips on how to make the most of its window management. At the moment it doesn’t seem any better than Windows. What are the features I should be using to get a better window management experience than Windows 10/11?
I have been using Macs and Windows for 10+ and I am not a big fan of Mac windows management, specifically the fact that you have to enter full screen view to have side-by-side applications.I’m a newcomer to Mac OS and I think I need some tips on how to make the most of its window management. At the moment it doesn’t seem any better than Windows. What are the features I should be using to get a better window management experience than Windows 10/11?
No pictures for me either, Firefox/Kiwi/Chrome on Android.Pictures (header/gallery) in this article also not loading for me. FF/Win11/Linux
I’m a newcomer to Mac OS and I think I need some tips on how to make the most of its window management. At the moment it doesn’t seem any better than Windows. What are the features I should be using to get a better window management experience than Windows 10/11
No, of course you are right, you can't make the laptop smaller than the screen. But you can minimize the bezel. And the truth is both the 13" as well as the 15" Air have a lot of bezel.People will buy this because they want a large screen, the "footprint" being close to existing 15/16" laptops isn't really relevant. You can't magically make inches smaller... Many people want a thin and light large screened Air, the fact that the number of square inches it takes up on ones desk is close to the 16" Pro doesn't make anyone think "Well shit I might as well spend $1000 more on a machine thats way too powerful for my needs and much heavier/bulkier than I want."
Yea. I so miss the 12" Macbook. And it would finally work great with an M chip!There was no 11" MacBook. There was an 11" MacBook Air, and a 12" MacBook (which I own the 2015 model, sitting around here somewhere. I still regret the loss of that form factor too)
A cheap DisplayLink dock provides this capability (albeit using a Screen Recording OS kludge). Works like a charm with my base M1 Air. In fact, I occasionally add my 11” iPad Pro as a fourth screen for palettes and the like.I would love to order this but the fact that it doesn't support dual displays is a deal breaker. It feels like it is an artificial restriction to push people who have multiple displays up to the Pro version (how many workplaces now don't have dual displays?)
I would love to order this but the fact that it doesn't support dual displays is a deal breaker. It feels like it is an artificial restriction to push people who have multiple displays up to the Pro version (how many workplaces now don't have dual displays?)
Apple has a huge weight in the consumer laptop market in the US (except at the very low end, as you say), and LG and Samsung may only do well in South Korea (wasn't Samsung also selling decently well in Europe? Anyway), but HP and Lenovo (and to a lesser extent Dell, Asus, Acer, and HP) do sell a lot of laptops to consumers worldwide, and not only at the low end of the market.The market for "PCs" is divided into three parts basically:
1. Cheap shit people buy for cheap shit reasons. Consumers, Nonprofits, Cheap Small Businesses, and Education tend to buy this stuff because it's cheap AF. Apple makes no attempt to play in this market.
2. Mainstream business market. For a wide variety of reasons at most businesses, the default are Windows laptops and small desktops built to a price point with sufficiently long warranties and often leases. Apple doesn't play in this market directly, though there are certain types of "creative" and high tech oriented companies that play business games differently and Apple sells a lot of machines to these types.
3. Regular consumers - Apple sells a ton of machines to regular consumers as this is their main market. Any random public place you go where people have their computers will readily make this obvious as overy 50% will be Apples.
LG and Samsung only do significant sales in one Market: South Korea and sadly for LG even there they are stuck behind Asus and Apple. (This is kind of a new thing as well, 10 years ago it was difficult to see anyone in Korea with any foreign brand, but things are changing.)
First of all, note that apps are one thing, and 'document windows' are another. An app can be running, but not have any documents open; or it can have lots of document windows, but there's still only one app. Command Tab cycles through applications, not windows. Command ` (backtick) cycles through the foremost application's windows.I’m a newcomer to Mac OS and I think I need some tips on how to make the most of its window management. At the moment it doesn’t seem any better than Windows. What are the features I should be using to get a better window management experience than Windows 10/11?
Where?
Agreed. I'm not a massive Mac user (occassional for work), but i'd buy one of those. I've tried tablets (ipad and surface) with keyboards and they always end up bigger, heavier and worse than a proper lightweight laptop. My current personal carry is a Lenovo Slim Carbon (975g or thereabouts) - a 12" macbook would be around that and a bit smaller if they stuck with aluminium (but how cool would an open weave carbon macbook be with tranlucent coloured resin over the top?).Yea. I so miss the 12" Macbook. And it would finally work great with an M chip!
Like the iPad Pro 12 but with a proper clamshell keyboard and a proper opera
Just what I was thinking, this article/page is displaying weirdly for me, as if some part of the formatting has failed to load or that it's doing some kind of resolution scaling which omits parts (even when maximised on 1080p monitor)Where?
There are tonnes of option. Hold option-key while clicking "more space" and you'll get an extensive list of options. There are also countless of free 3rd-party apps that let you add customised resolutions.A good question. Maybe ~1920px by ~1240px, assuming it's a similar 1.5x scaling (2560 → 1680)? Using essentially 1680px on a laptop felt like a step backwards when I moved from an FHD HP Spectre 13" → WQXGA M1 MacBook Air.
Apple doesn't list the scaled resolutions on the website with the M2 models anymore, so we'll need to confirm with a review![]()
15.3". It's not an off the shelf panel.it’s called “15” but it is 15.6 inch. So obviously close to the pro 16.2 inch.
I have a work supplied MBA M1 and I never see any need for more memory. The 8GB that it has is obviously ruthlessly managed by MacOS despite me having many tabs open in multiple Chrome windows, Slack (app) and potentially other apps - the memory management abilities really mean that you do not need 16GB.If it came with 16GB RAM as base/standard it would be perfect, plus give it a 512GB SSD to start with. Currently that CTO is $1,699, rather high.
Several manufacturers make external docks using displaylink Software. I’m using a dell d6000 on my m2 13” air to run dual 4K monitors. it works great for productivity type work.I would love to order this but the fact that it doesn't support dual displays is a deal breaker. It feels like it is an artificial restriction to push people who have multiple displays up to the Pro version (how many workplaces now don't have dual displays?)
I was just reminiscing about my old laptops, and my first one for college was an old Dell Inspiron 8200. Reviews mentioned that it was a “light” 7.6 lbs. so sure, 3.3 is light. Plus many of the other “light” laptops I’ve used over the years have been so plasticky that they tend to just sag when picking them up. If a little extra weight is going into a nice, rigid shell, I’d happily take that trade.if you think that weight is incredibly portable I'd really hate to see what you think isn't....
I have read there wasn't space to put a second display controller on the SoC for the M1 or M2 machines, thus just one external displayI would love to order this but the fact that it doesn't support dual displays is a deal breaker. It feels like it is an artificial restriction to push people who have multiple displays up to the Pro version (how many workplaces now don't have dual displays?)
Every workplace I've been at in the past 15 years had dual displays on every desktop too. But I think that's because smallish displays are cheap, and also because Windows users tend to maximize things so they only interact with one app per display. I would have rather have had a single large external display with a good window management system like the Mac has.
The old PowerBook G4 12” was 10.9 inches wide, 8.6 inches deep, and 1.2 inches thick; at 4.6 pounds
The new MacBook Air M2 13”:
1/3 the thickness, the same depth, an inch wider, and two pounds lighter.
- Height: 0.44 inch (1.13 cm)
- Width: 11.97 inches (30.41 cm)
- Depth: 8.46 inches (21.5 cm)
- Weight: 2.7 pounds (1.24 kg)
What is there to miss? The extra weight and thickness?
I think the secret of “8GB is enough” is that your swap file is on a bloody fast SSD drive. With a 100MB/sec hard drive it would slow down to a crawl if you use more than 8GB. I have a cheap 800MB/sec SSD connected to my Mac, with that speed it would be noticeable and sometimes annoying. Now with a 3GB/sec SSD drive you take no notice.I have a work supplied MBA M1 and I never see any need for more memory. The 8GB that it has is obviously ruthlessly managed by MacOS despite me having many tabs open in multiple Chrome windows, Slack (app) and potentially other apps - the memory management abilities really mean that you do not need 16GB.
My personal MBA M2 has 16GB and again it is never really stretched despite photoshop / Lightroom being resource hungry. The only time I really see it suffering is rendering video, some of the huge files from my FP can be a bit unwieldy and something like a crop on a multi-GB 12-bit DNG file can take a while.... But that is a combination of ssd speed, memory and processor - the same operation will entirely lock up most laptops.
For the vast majority of users, 8GB is sufficient. The extra storage suggested would not be a bad idea if it were not for iCloud - I am using about 150GB on my MBA, much of which is photos. But again, iCloud insulates you really nicely and 256GB is once more almost certainly enough for the majority.
Here is a thought: You saw complaints after the first ones shipped, but now you don’t hear complaints. We saw complaints about phones and iPads that bent. We heard complaints about massive number of writes to SSD drives. We heard complaints that FaceID could be tricked by a photo. All immediately after Apple released something new. A month later - crickets. If these were real problems for real customers the complaints wouldn’t go away.I've read that the speaker quality is relatively good as well.
Does the Midnight finish still have durability problems? I recall a bit of a hullabaloo about that after the first Midnight MacBooks shipped.
Nope. Apple Silicon Macs also swap a lot less than Intel Macs in my own practical experience.I think the secret of “8GB is enough” is that your swap file is on a bloody fast SSD drive. With a 100MB/sec hard drive it would slow down to a crawl if you use more than 8GB. I have a cheap 800MB/sec SSD connected to my Mac, with that speed it would be noticeable and sometimes annoying. Now with a 3GB/sec SSD drive you take no notice.
Followed not too long after by "Warning: Insufficient Memory" messages when people found they did need / want more than 640k of memory. :^)"640K of RAM ought to be enough for anybody."
- Some dude named Bill
Yea I am complaing that air now equals 3 oz of difference. I’ve had most of the models since the PowerBook 100 series. The current 3 pounds has been the bottom for a while and as I get older - I really feel the weight in my backpack and on trips. The first air was so amazing because finally it didn’t feel like carrying a brick around with you. I had a 12 inch MacBook for a while and it was 2 pounds…. 2008 was 15 years ago… so yea I am complaining about them not getting any lighter in 15 years. I’d really like a 13 inch or 15 inch that comes close to 2 pounds. Physics be damned!The equivalently-sized models, the 14" and 16" MBP, are both (predictably) heavier than the 15" Air. Are you complaining that the 15" MacBook Air should weigh, what, one pound? It'd be nice, sure, but so far, physics has other plans.
At home I have one massive 43" 4K display and my MBP and agree it's better, but at work all we have are cheapo Dell 1080p monitors and not being able to use two would be a dealbreaker for me.Every workplace I've been at in the past 15 years had dual displays on every desktop too. But I think that's because smallish displays are cheap, and also because Windows users tend to maximize things so they only interact with one app per display. I would have rather have had a single large external display with a good window management system like the Mac has.
I don't know why you're being downvoted for this.I would love to order this but the fact that it doesn't support dual displays is a deal breaker. It feels like it is an artificial restriction to push people who have multiple displays up to the Pro version (how many workplaces now don't have dual displays?)
You're being downvoted, but this has been my experience as well with an M2 MBA 13" with 8GB RAM. Most Mac average consumers won't need more and the only thing I can attribute that to is MacOS. My ex's Windows laptop with 12GB of RAM is just bog-slow all of the time and I do way more than she does. Multiple Firefox tabs, Apple Music streaming, Slack, and occasionally a VSCode window open when I'm working from home. Feels faster than my work-provided 2019 Intel i9 MBP w/16GB RAM at times.I have a work supplied MBA M1 and I never see any need for more memory. The 8GB that it has is obviously ruthlessly managed by MacOS despite me having many tabs open in multiple Chrome windows, Slack (app) and potentially other apps - the memory management abilities really mean that you do not need 16GB.
My personal MBA M2 has 16GB and again it is never really stretched despite photoshop / Lightroom being resource hungry. The only time I really see it suffering is rendering video, some of the huge files from my FP can be a bit unwieldy and something like a crop on a multi-GB 12-bit DNG file can take a while.... But that is a combination of ssd speed, memory and processor - the same operation will entirely lock up most laptops.
For the vast majority of users, 8GB is sufficient. The extra storage suggested would not be a bad idea if it were not for iCloud - I am using about 150GB on my MBA, much of which is photos. But again, iCloud insulates you really nicely and 256GB is once more almost certainly enough for the majority.
1. The LG Gram 17 is 3.2 pounds. There are plenty of big screen laptops as light or lighter, such as the entire Samsung Galaxy Book Pro lineup.
The point holds though. I recall having some sort of memory problem on my Mac mini soon after I’d bought my first SSD. Some app had gone nuts or something.Nope. Apple Silicon Macs also swap a lot less than Intel Macs in my own practical experience.
Fast Flash is just a bonus when they finally do after all, but that's been available on newer Intel Macs as well.
Because his comment was a criticism of an Apple product, it's that simple.I don't know why you're being downvoted for this.