“Kinematic intelligence” helps robots learn their limits

Hypatia

Ars Centurion
242
Subscriptor
I second LordByronII above. This is an excellent write-up. Just solid tech journalism all the way through.

It’s interesting to me that, given this:
And (surprisingly, these days) Kinematic Intelligence was built in an AI-free manner.
They chose to call this framework “Kinematic Intelligence”. Years ago, I wouldn’t have thought twice about that name. Now, with the ongoing AI hype, I wonder why they didn’t opt for something like “Kinematic Topology” or “Kinematic Adaptation” instead.

I can imagine plenty of reasons, but do we have any real insight into the story behind the naming convention here?
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

no_great_name

Ars Centurion
366
Subscriptor++
I second LordByronII above. This is an excellent write-up. Just solid tech journalism all the way through.

It’s interesting to me that, given this:

They chose to call this framework “Kinematic Intelligence”. Years ago, I wouldn’t have thought twice about that name. Now, with the ongoing AI hype, I wonder why they didn’t opt for something like “Kinematic Topology” or “Kinematic Adaptation” instead.

I can imagine plenty of reasons, but do we have any real insight into the story behind the naming convention here?
Seems like a reasonable use of the word intelligence honestly. Giving robots an innate understanding of the limitations of their bodies and how to safely navigate around those limitations to accomplish tasks.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

aurelius rex

Smack-Fu Master, in training
60
Subscriptor++
In human terms, it works roughly like locking the elbows as they get fully straightened when pushing something heavy, which makes the arms unable to perform side-to-side movements for a moment
Excellent analogy. I tried it myself and immediately understood. Jacek, I’m really enjoying your articles.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)