I second LordByronII above. This is an excellent write-up. Just solid tech journalism all the way through.
It’s interesting to me that, given this:
They chose to call this framework “Kinematic Intelligence”. Years ago, I wouldn’t have thought twice about that name. Now, with the ongoing AI hype, I wonder why they didn’t opt for something like “Kinematic Topology” or “Kinematic Adaptation” instead.
I can imagine plenty of reasons, but do we have any real insight into the story behind the naming convention here?