Yes, it is shockingly neat! I'm not sure I could write like that if I tried.I have given unsatisfactory employees the opportunity to tender their resignation, which obviously means they retain their credentials for a time. It is a risk. I would not give that opportunity if I were about to fire them for the express reason of committing crimes with their credentials!
Also, that goofus has utterly incredible handwriting. I have never seen such a thing. Maybe he can teach lessons in prison?
I can't answer the first question, but as to your second one... this is actually quite common. A warrant is usually executed to gather information, and there's commonly a significant gap between warrant execution and arrest.How did they have a wire fraud conviction and still pass the background check for a job with a federal contractor?
How the hell were they free for 9 months after the search?
The employer is referred to only as "COMPANY-1" throughout the legal docs.How come the employer isn’t named in the article? Seems like relevant information, since they were the ones careless enough to hire these dumbasses, AFTER they had a criminal record IN THE SAME STATE.
Muneeb apparently wants to proceed pro se. I wonder if an LLM convinced him to do this.Did he get ChatGPT to write his letter too ?
That, and the fact that they had passwords in plaintext might be the reason why one of the brothers claims that the contractor is also being investigated by the Feds.How come the employer isn’t named in the article? Seems like relevant information, since they were the ones careless enough to hire these dumbasses, AFTER they had a criminal record IN THE SAME STATE.
Criminal background checks are outsourced to a vendor. I am wondering what went wrong for this to be missed. Did the employer not do a background check? Did the vendor screw up?How come the employer isn’t named in the article? Seems like relevant information, since they were the ones careless enough to hire these dumbasses, AFTER they had a criminal record IN THE SAME STATE.
I joke that the hardest/dreadest thing I do at work every year is write Christmas cards to my team.Yes, it is shockingly neat! I'm not sure I could write like that if I tried.
(Former attorney here) I understand that it takes time - but 9 months? For the kind of shit they pulled?I can't answer the first question, but as to your second one... this is actually quite common. A warrant is usually executed to gather information, and there's commonly a significant gap between warrant execution and arrest.
Yeah but then Compy 386 blares NICE TRY! and NOTTA CHANCE!Off topic, but I would find it so satisfying to use a gigantic dedicated Delete button like this.
If I had a company that careless, that would be an ideal name for all the lawsuits.The employer is referred to only as "COMPANY-1" throughout the legal docs.
dhsproddbWho the hell gave them tech jobs after serving time for wire fraud? Especially jobs as government contractors? Doesn't SOC-2 require firms to do background checks?
How come the employer isn’t named in the article? Seems like relevant information, since they were the ones careless enough to hire these dumbasses, AFTER they had a criminal record IN THE SAME STATE.
At 4:59 pm, he asked an AI tool, “How do i clear system logs from SQL servers after deleting databases?” He later asked, “How do you clear all event and application logs from Microsoft windows server 2012?”
Thanks; I hadn't seen the Cyberscoop story. I've added some of that info as a brief update to the piece.dhsproddb
OMG the database name.
The company is Opexus.
Edit: link
https://cyberscoop.com/opexus-background-checks-insider-attack-muneeb-sohaib-akhter/
This ^^^...
Also, that goofus has utterly incredible handwriting...
If my boss was like "Hey, what should we name the DHS production database?" I'd probably come up with the same thing. Or maybe dhsprddb so the columns align nicely with the dev & stg instances.dhsproddb
OMG the database name.
Didn't one (or more, likely) of the DOGE goons have a criminal record? Or was at least under indictment for something? Seem to recall that, anyway.Didn't we hear about these two semi-recently or was that someone else that also had a history of criminal activity that went on to work for the government (directly or indirectly) that did something like this?
Here’s a link to Opexus’ web site:dhsproddb
OMG the database name.
The company is Opexus.
Edit: link
https://cyberscoop.com/opexus-background-checks-insider-attack-muneeb-sohaib-akhter/
“We deliver built-for-government case management software so FOIA (open records), audit, investigations, OIG, workforce management, and procurement teams can automate workflows, find information, and put your backlogs on notice.”
OPEXUS is FedRAMP and StateRAMP-authorized, reflecting a strong commitment to security and compliance standards to keep its customers’ data safe and secure in the cloud.