OpenAI to recast hit chatbot as a route to higher-margin products before a potential IPO.
See full article...
See full article...
Yup, come into the market, ruin normal web searches to the point that if I want any good results I have to use a chat bot, rug pull the chatbot and start charging out the nose.“Chat is dead,” said one senior OpenAI employee.
“Chat is dead,” said one senior OpenAI employee.
Are they making money, though?“Approximately a year ago, OpenAI’s strategy was swing for the fences, whereas Anthropic’s strategy is make money first,” said Jenny Xiao, partner at Leonis Capital and former researcher at OpenAI.
“When we have [artificial general intelligence], I don’t think there will be a large number of distinct brands,” said Alex Embiricos, OpenAI’s head of enterprise product. “Probably there will be a single entity that I can talk to that can do whatever I need.”
So, never, eh?When we have [artificial general intelligence]
Sorry, what margin?OpenAI to recast hit chatbot as a route to higher-margin products before a potential IPO.
Well, you see, Dario said in an interview that a theoretical version of Anthropic might be profitable if they just left all of their expenses off the books, so it must be true.Are they making money, though?
They just can't help themselves lolSo, never, eh?
“When we have [artificial general intelligence], I don’t think there will be a large number of distinct brands,” said Alex Embiricos, OpenAI’s head of enterprise product. “Probably there will be a single entity that I can talk to that can do whatever I need.”
You mean it wasn't a big money maker to develop the go-to tool for college students to cheat on their essays, lawyers to fake their briefs, unscrupulous scientists to fabricate data/manuscripts, or others to flood the Internet with convincing-sounding nonsense? I can't believe it! /sThe company intends to transform the chatbot into a “superapp” that combines coding tools and AI agents, adding products that executives believe will generate more revenue.
Well, see, a less negative margin is technically a "higher" margin than an even more negative margin, if you plot on a graph.Sorry, what margin?
I am honestly a bit of a sucker for AI stories and this one has got to be the stupidest thing I've read in a year.Fuck me but I feel slightly stupider for having read that vacuous fluff piece masquerading as a serious article.
900% of Zero silly.Sorry, what margin?
The company intends to transform the chatbot into a “superapp” that combines coding tools and AI agents, adding products that executives believe will generate more revenue.
Try and remember that OpenAI's definition of "AGI" is not "acts like a rational entity," but "Makes $100,000,000,000."“Approximately a year ago, OpenAI’s strategy was swing for the fences, whereas Anthropic’s strategy is make money first,” said Jenny Xiao, partner at Leonis Capital and former researcher at OpenAI.”
Uh-huh, sounds reasonable.
“When we have [artificial general intelligence], I don’t think there will be a large number of distinct brands,” said Alex Embiricos, OpenAI’s head of enterprise product. “Probably there will be a single entity that I can talk to that can do whatever I need.”
So, how are those fences again?
Also I want to know if your AGI will finally be able to tell me how much milk is in my fridge because, I feel that’s a serious gap in my life that technology has been unable to help me with despite all the grandiose promises.
Fuck me but I feel slightly stupider for having read that vacuous fluff piece masquerading as a serious article.
Re: milk“Approximately a year ago, OpenAI’s strategy was swing for the fences, whereas Anthropic’s strategy is make money first,” said Jenny Xiao, partner at Leonis Capital and former researcher at OpenAI.”
Uh-huh, sounds reasonable.
“When we have [artificial general intelligence], I don’t think there will be a large number of distinct brands,” said Alex Embiricos, OpenAI’s head of enterprise product. “Probably there will be a single entity that I can talk to that can do whatever I need.”
So, how are those fences again?
Also I want to know if your AGI will finally be able to tell me how much milk is in my fridge because, I feel that’s a serious gap in my life that technology has been unable to help me with despite all the grandiose promises.
Fuck me but I feel slightly stupider for having read that vacuous fluff piece masquerading as a serious article.
Are chatbots going to enter into push advertising, that is getting into everything these days? /SSorry, what margin?
NopeAre they making money, though?
This really hit me over the weekend walking into a Lowe's. The big ridiculous riding mowers had tags on them, with "special offers" if you signed up. For a subscription.* To Lowe's. To buy stuff.Sometimes we forget that search engines and what not are not really free.
Every time one search is done, data is collected and sold for different purpose.
I'm starting to smell a possible enshittification (is even possible) of basic services, so that you will have eventually to upgrade to paid ones, for anything.
They are spending money that they do not actually posses, based on projected income that it's very difficult to actually believe will be remotely close to the actual numbers.
Oh gods, I’d forgotten about that load of happy horseshit. From the article, it looks like Mr Embiricos has forgotten too, or at least he appears to have given that he’s jabbering on about entities that can do whatever he wants.Try and remember that OpenAI's definition of "AGI" is not "acts like a rational entity," but "Makes $100,000,000,000."
And never try to graph it to scale, your computer screen does not extend that far underground.Well, see, a less negative margin is technically a "higher" margin than an even more negative margin, if you plot on a graph.
The emperor has no clothes (again)."Chat is Dead..."
(But OpenAI still needs it / will still use it to draw in free users, in order to give them a taste of the related products they wish to sell, so)
..."Long live Chat" ... or something.
Also:
"It will transcend the actual surface . . . what we’re building towards is where you have your own personal agent that is capable of helping you… across everything in your life...."
The fucking EGO on these guys. They really think they're inventing God, don't they? Can't even speak plain English anymore. "AI is so... ABOVE, bro... so transcendent. You just can't see what we here at OpenAI see." This is the culture you get when it's created by a manipulative asshole like Altman.
What a hand-wavy crock of shit. Loosely translated: they have no idea what this amazing "final app / service" they're talking about will look like, or which things it will do better than others, but they do know they can make it easy for people to assign a bunch of agents. So they make an all-encompassing, dramatic-sounding statement, when all they're really saying is, you'll have some sort of agent manager app to do a bunch of random shit for you.
(Whether each thing is a good idea or not they wouldn't know, as that requires actual hard-core testing for a significant period of time, and they don't give enough fucks to do that).
Same old shit. 25 years ago people talked about the Segway and how cities would be redesigned for it."It will transcend the actual surface . . . what we’re building towards is where you have your own personal agent that is capable of helping you… across everything in your life...."
"Actually Generates Income" is the AGI they've all been looking for.Try and remember that OpenAI's definition of "AGI" is not "acts like a rational entity," but "Makes $100,000,000,000."