Yeah, why no rangefinder? Is that something else that is delayed or was that not in Orion’s design?Nothing like testing proximity ops without a rangefinder.
Sounds like an apt comparison for the webcasts too. SpaceX has all the graphics and telemetry. NASA had... not much.“The crew (on Orion) has to be much more proficient to know where to go to see the right information. The SpaceX vehicle was built so that your kids could jump off their video games and jump in Dragon. A lot of it is intuitive, and that’s a good thing. That’s the paradigm that they are shooting for.”
Bold strategy, Cotton.On this mission, the spacecraft lacks a rangefinder to measure the distance between Orion and the upper stage.
Those poor spectators.Moments later, a wave of sound reached spectators a few miles away as the rocket thundered into the sky, leaving an incandescent plume of fire and smoke in its wake.
Yo, modern car makers - take note! This is how it's done!I really like the mix of physical controls, glass cockpit displays, and mechanical switches for critical functions on Orion.
Well, you wouldn't want to give such an important job to an amateur Canadian, would you?Jeremy Hansen is a mission specialist on Artemis 2, but according to Ars his job is professional Canadian.![]()
Well, you wouldn't want to give such an important job to an amateur Canadian, would you?
I got teary-eyed reading your comment. This is nice. Nice things are nice.I was born only months before Apollo 11. I cried watching it today. Got teary again just typing this.
I've got a feeling that flag waving is a large reason why the mission got off the ground.Too bad the flag is obscuring that pic.
I've got a feeling that flag waving is a large reason why the mission got off the ground.
You aren't going to like the answer.Yeah, why no rangefinder? Is that something else that is delayed or was that not in Orion’s design?
Also not recovered: the four RS-25 engines on the core stage, which borders on a criminal offense in my mind. Those engines are things of absolute beauty, and are reusable. But SLS decided to make them one-and-done. Of the four on this mission, I think three of them flew on a Shuttle mission, and one of them is a Frankenstein from leftover parts.The launcher’s twin boosters consumed their solid propellant in a little more than two minutes after reaching an altitude of more than 150,000 feet, then jettisoned to fall into the Atlantic Ocean. They won’t be recovered.
You aren't going to like the answer.
This Orion is incomplete. It has no nose hatch, IDSS port, or docking tunnel. The rangefinder, actually a 2D scanning LIDAR is in <drumroll> the docking tunnel. Artemis III will be the first "for real this time" everything included Orion.
What I posted was a mockup for training and one that has been beat up for years. The final version in the capsule is more polished but due to the positioning it is hard to find photos that show the whole layout.Maybe it's just me, but it all looks a bit crude, TBH. Almost like software with a UI designed by an engineer with no real HMI training or design experience. Functional, but one of the panels on the left even appears to be mounted crookedly.
I really like the mix of physical controls, glass cockpit displays, and mechanical switches for critical functions on Orion.
View attachment 132046
The translation hand controller is the square in the upper right hand corner of each pilot station. The rotational hand controller is the joystick looking thing. the cursor controller is that thing to the left.
Not quite, they've got a Mark I rangefinder named HansenNothing like testing proximity ops without a rangefinder.
I assume the upper stage has some smaller thrusters or something to safely deorbit? Tell me NASA is practising good orbital hygiene and not just leaving it up there to decay over a random city?The upper stage will vent all of its hydrogen fuel before Orion moves in close.
Not quite, they've got a Mark I rangefinder named Hansen![]()
Psht. Who even needs the extra mass?Yeah, why no rangefinder? Is that something else that is delayed or was that not in Orion’s design?
Thanks for clarifying the original photo source. I was thinking how the prominent use of "80/20" aluminum struts would make that company very proud, and also thinking it looks like a lab bench?What I posted was a mockup for training and one that has been beat up for years. The final version in the capsule is more polished but due to the positioning it is hard to find photos that show the whole layout.
View attachment 132053
Yeah, it should be really $100 bill. Or perhaps some bacon. Or both.Too bad the flag is obscuring that pic. I enjoyed the launch. As a member of GenX, I'm always a bit nervous during launches.