Michigan politicians want to ban Chinese-badged cars from even visiting the US

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
51,086
Subscriptor
I wonder if the NSA has a contract with Flock banning them from selling data outside of the US?

Naaaaaaah, who am I kidding. Flock will sell to whoever has money, contracts and rules be damned.
It's trivial to set up a fully independent company in the US that buys the data and oops we just got hacked.

It's a tiny bit harder to find an IT employee at Flock who is on hard times and somehow ensure they suddenly can buy themselves a house.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

Oldmanalex

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,935
Subscriptor++
If the days of cheap gas are really ended, we are going to need a lot more congressional action to make $80+K 6000lb behemoths the most attractive things on the market for the average buyer. How people on 20 hr/week, $10/hr gig jobs are going to be able to afford Detroit's output is also questionable. Maybe juggernaut ownership can be made compulsory? A yearly minimum milage, which you are allowed to achieve by jacking up the driving wheels, and rolling coal in place? If that is the progressive answer, one awaits the regressive one with a certain sangfroid anticipation.
 
Upvote
6 (9 / -3)
Free market used to mean beating your competitors because you were better for the customer, not using laws to limit your competition.
Even that's a capitalist myth. Businesses have been using governmental (or mob or cartel) force to fuck better products out of the market since the beginning.
 
Upvote
37 (38 / -1)

C.M. Allen

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,150
"GET THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR FREE MARKETS!!!!

EXCEPT WHEN WE CAN'T COMPETE!!!"
Capitalists have only ever wanted a 'free market' when they've already monopolized it. The second any sort of potential competition appears on the distant horizon, they're the first cry foul and push to further entrench themselves. Because that's how the profit motive works, and that's the only motive that exists under capitalism.
 
Upvote
38 (39 / -1)

jeblucas

Ars Scholae Palatinae
732
Why make good cars when you can just forbid people from knowing good cars exist? America 250! Yasssssss

Imagine the Cybertruck (typed this as Cybertrick by accident and almost didn’t go back to fix it) was instead in the model of those sweetass BYDs with all the trimmings. I would actually be a little jealous when I saw one instead of laughing at the ineptitude of “American-made” as of 2025.

What complaints can I have about China that I can’t immediately assign to my own country? Concentration camps for undesirables? Check and check. Human rights abuses going back decades, check and check. Militaristic bullying of neighbors? Checkity check-check. I can say with confidence that we have them beat on gutter racism. You could make a case that we had less official corruption, but GUESS WHAT.

Ugh. I am just cranky this morning, and stories about inept scaremongering by elected officials trying to flagwrap themselves into office again is pissing me off because it means I can’t get a cheap electric vehicle here for another 10 years.
 
Upvote
38 (38 / 0)

Oldmanalex

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,935
Subscriptor++
I think the point is that surveillance gear would be found/seized by security checkpoint at said airbase before entry onto the base.

The vehicle having integrated 360 degree cameras would not.

That said, this could apply to any vehicle with said sensor suite.
One might think that any Chinese spy worth his or her salt would modify something with a Dodge Hemi in it to use the sensors for spying. Or maybe buy the info from Vlad after the neoNazis in the military (or Kegsbreath's Pentagon) have sold it to him.
 
Upvote
18 (18 / 0)

rmaine

Ars Scholae Palatinae
919
...and what stops these hypothetical PRC agents from putting the surveillance gear in a pelican case and driving across the border in a rental Ford?

It's not like a Chinese EV is going to have cutting-edge hyperspectral imagers and broad-spectrum RF recorders; they'll have the same COTS sensors that you can find in all kinds of gadgets.
You're not expecting sensibility out of those people are you? It's just whatever makes for good sound bites aimed at people who don't really do that thinking thing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
8 (9 / -1)

Erbium168

Ars Centurion
3,004
Subscriptor
Visiting the US around 1980 I didn't believe it when I was told that we had to ditch our company car for a rental Oldsmobile in order to visit the Olds plant in Lansing. But it became clear that it was true; friendly signs informed you that any non-GM cars would be modified with a sledgehammer. At this time Oldsmobile was extremely successful.
How is that HQ doing now?
 
Upvote
32 (32 / 0)
...and what stops these hypothetical PRC agents from putting the surveillance gear in a pelican case and driving across the border in a rental Ford?

It's not like a Chinese EV is going to have cutting-edge hyperspectral imagers and broad-spectrum RF recorders; they'll have the same COTS sensors that you can find in all kinds of gadgets.
They are not talking about willful foreign agents. They are talking about the Chinese car manufacturer using the car built-camera to record video and sharing them with the Chinese government. The person driving around can be any ordinary, unwilling participant.
 
Upvote
-11 (6 / -17)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,929
Ars Staff
News flash for all these politicians. Very likely that the connecting parts of US made cars are made in China. Going to ban those circuit boards like you did the China made routers? Doesn't really matter much security wise where most of the vehicle is made. Just the parts that phone home.
Under the conditions of those commerce department rules, I very much doubt that's true now. If you know of Chinese connected components in Fords etc, please share that info.
 
Upvote
5 (8 / -3)

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,260
Subscriptor++
...and what stops these hypothetical PRC agents from putting the surveillance gear in a pelican case and driving across the border in a rental Ford?

It's not like a Chinese EV is going to have cutting-edge hyperspectral imagers and broad-spectrum RF recorders; they'll have the same COTS sensors that you can find in all kinds of gadgets.
Yeah and then there's spy satellites and. . .

1780930335175.png


The REAL spying threat isn't seeing stuff like an Air Force base at the fence perimeter - the military has long understood the threat of seeing things at a base, and anything interesting isn't really in view.

The real spy threat is tracking moving people/vehicles everywhere they go. I call out people separately, because in theory someone might ride a bus to/from an AFB, even transfer busses, etc.

The real spy threat is that instead of one vehicle following a person of interest, which might be noticed by the driver, or a security detail. . . that if you have millions of cars being driven around the US, you now have a vast spying NETWORK that can track people and vehicles everyone, with no physical tailing. And very little cost to China or any other country.

Also being able to track patterns of movements of multiple people, like seeing that a bunch of scientists and engineers that specialize in a particular field, have all started frequently going to a particular AFB or DARPA facility, suggesting some skunkworks project related to that field is underway.

That said, such bans don't address the underlying issue of millions of cars being corralled into a tracking net. Pass legislation that's comprehensive and addresses the threat across all car and mobile devices (phone/tablet, etc). Like make it much more limited what user data device OEMs are allowed to gather and transmit back to their servers. Give people real privacy, so they have confidence their devices aren't secretly spying for anyone.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)
Sad to see the (D) tags here. I'm used to the GQP sticking their heads in the sand and pretending the rest of the world isn't moving on but I guess it will be a bipartisan block to keep Americans from understanding why the US auto industry is going to implode in the next 10 years.
It's very difficult. The auto industry is both still significant in the state and emblematic of a broader difficulty with the visage of blue collar union factory workers generally uninterested in geopolitics or science and engineering and increasingly taken in by Joe Rogan and the like, pulled between narratives and politics of both the Democratic and Republican parties. The backdrop is an uncompetitive domestic industry and a federal government that is corrupt and at best unhelpful. Protectionist racket narratives are politically expedient for everybody in the short term. But the state is in trouble from many fronts, from this to reduced trade due to Trump's trade wars (look at the drama around the bridges in Detroit) to forced coal plant antics and politics over sustainable energy to pollution and invasive species threats to the great lakes and on and on... much of it not really the state government's fault, but very much their problem. That said, there are many advantages as well. It should be an is an amazing part of the country. But the backdrop is similar to struggles in states like Pennsylvania or Wisconsin, but more stark - wider geopolitics and changing industry hollowing out complacent domestic economics, and disingenuous politics commandeering those struggles. Frankly, as decent-but-bland as Whitmer's administration has been in the face of the times, it's really more that the state's GOP is utterly, comedically (even more than elsewhere) farcical - think shouting matches and fistfights and Mean Girls-style games - that has forestalled it taking hold and worse chaos. Michigan is kind of boring Blue Wall-ish midwestern state but there are ingredients here for upheaval.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
6 (8 / -2)

Coriolanus

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,859
Subscriptor++
If you want a tangible means of understanding just how far ahead China is, go to your local Asian food store. If you are lucky, they will stock some ice cream in the frozen section. You may notice some ice creams that look exactly like fruits with nice details. They also taste like the fruits they look like. Be warned, if you try these fruits you will become jaded of scooping the slop from the tub…

Even Chinas ice cream is 50 years ahead of American ice cream technology.
To be fair, China invented ice cream.

The earliest evidence of anything approaching ice cream being made was in China in the Tang period (A.D. 618-907). Buffalo, cows’ and goats’ milk was heated and allowed to ferment. This ‘yoghurt’ was then mixed with flour for thickening, camphor (yes camphor!) for flavour and ‘refrigerated’ before being served. King Tang of Shang had a staff of 2,271 people which included 94 ice-men.

https://ice-cream.org/about-the-ice-cream-alliance/history-of-ice-cream/
 
Upvote
18 (19 / -1)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,929
Ars Staff
How people on 20 hr/week, $10/hr gig jobs are going to be able to afford Detroit's output is also questionable.
The exact same way these people always buy cars: by buying used.

There is no unalienable right to afford a new car in America, even though a lot of people somehow think there is? Three quarters of car buyers buy used.
 
Upvote
8 (9 / -1)
So we’re back to the 1990’s where half the cars in a Wal-Mart parking lot in Michigan had BUY AMERICAN bumper stickers printed by UAW sympathizers

Protect “our” jobs while we enjoy a free market.

Nah, I’ll pass. Tried that back then and it didn’t work out. Either build the car I want, import it or license it. Auto-makers no longer deserve special carve-outs because yet again they’ve been caught flat-footed.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

Tagbert

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,030
Subscriptor
Sad to see the (D) tags here. I'm used to the GQP sticking their heads in the sand and pretending the rest of the world isn't moving on but I guess it will be a bipartisan block to keep Americans from understanding why the US auto industry is going to implode in the next 10 years.
This is purely about state-level politics in an election year and the need to keep car industry workers voting for Democrats. If it were to actually pass, then politicians and rich people wouldn't be able to buy Mercedes as they are about 15% owned by the Chinese.
 
Upvote
16 (17 / -1)

DrewW

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,051
Subscriptor++
As if we need to give Canadian visitors more reasons not to come to the US and spend money here? Cross border tourism is generally thought to be a good thing among sane people, which seems to include few politicians lately. Facepalm!
I was in Florida in November and early this year to visit family. You could get a rental car, a restaurant table, or a tee time anywhere, anytime. The Canadian boycott has massively impacted Florida tourism. My younger brother used to complain Canadians were bad tippers. Now he complains there are no Canadians.
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)

Cthel

Ars Praefectus
10,372
Subscriptor
They are not talking about willful foreign agents. They are talking about the Chinese car manufacturer using the car built-camera to record video and sharing them with the Chinese government. The person driving around can be any ordinary, unwilling participant.
How many Canadian tourists take a trip to visit Selfridge Air Force base? (The example the senator gave)

I agree that passive surveillance is a more likely threat, but the Senator claimed the threat was someone taking a deliberate trip to observe the airbase using the car's sensors.
 
Upvote
9 (10 / -1)

numerobis

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
51,086
Subscriptor
The exact same way these people always buy cars: by buying used.

There is no unalienable right to afford a new car in America, even though a lot of people somehow think there is? Three quarters of car buyers buy used.
And the people who buy new almost invariably depend on the used car market to resell the once-new car.

The number of people like myself who buy a car and keep it until it's junk is pretty small (and even then, my definition of junk is another's definition of a project).
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)
It's a tiny bit harder to find an IT employee at Flock who is on hard times and somehow ensure they suddenly can buy themselves a house.
Going through national security clearance they ask about gambling, drugs, and other vices.

Want to score an asset as a foreign agent? Look for the gambling addict, the drug addict, sex addict, or a person that was scorn by the company from how they are treated by their employer and or other employees. The best are the ones that changed their personal ideology and know how to keep quiet.

Money is not the only method to gain an asset. NRA redhead Russian agent highlights this [0]. Cuba's best assist(s) are driven by ideology and not greed [1].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Butina
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Montes.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

frogstomp

Seniorius Lurkius
35
Subscriptor
News flash for all these politicians. Very likely that the connecting parts of US made cars are made in China. Going to ban those circuit boards like you did the China made routers? Doesn't really matter much security wise where most of the vehicle is made. Just the parts that phone home.
Good question, yes, they are:
https://www.bis.gov/connected-vehicles
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Erbium168

Ars Centurion
3,004
Subscriptor
Naaaaaaah, who am I kidding. Flock will sell to whoever has money, contracts and rules be damned.
Define "selling outside the US".
Because if you sell to any large US corp, the stuff will go outside the US. Once it was all about projecting power and sending money and information to the mothership. Now, suddenly, there's a downside.

Years ago I was told as part of security training that the most dangerous spy was the secretary with access to the photocopier (which was before job logging started, but even so I once visited a secure government department for an audit and discovered that they were not logging print jobs.)
Now, you don't even need a photocopier. Just a helping hand in the IT department. No need to smuggle physical objects off site even.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

frogstomp

Seniorius Lurkius
35
Subscriptor
The true power of the free market is shown by using the government to save it from products made by a dramatically inferior socialist economy. This has nothing to do with surveillance. It has everything to do with being afraid Americans will realize how badly they're getting their assholes caved in by the awful quality:expense ratio of American vehicles compared to Chinese ones.
Not a socialist country.
A number of years ago the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) actually considered removing "Communist" from their name, to simply be "The Chinese Party".
China is a capitalist autocracy.
As with so many other things, they imported capitalism from the US then perfected the implementation themselves.

I leave the question as to whether the US is also a capitalist autocracy as an exercise for the reader.
(other Western states are available for questioning and criticism)

Edited to remove typo.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
21 (22 / -1)
Not a socialist country.
A number of years ago the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) actually considered removing "Communist" from their name, to simply be "The Chinese Party".
China is a capitalist autocracy.
As with so many other things, they imported capitalism from the US then perfected it the implementation themselves.

I leave the question as to whether the US is also a capitalist autocracy as an exercise for the reader.
(other Western states are available for questioning and criticism)
My comment was a broad commentary on the US v. China "capitalist vs. communist" debate. I know there's far more nuance.

That said, their social welfare programs and general cultural attitude toward collective betterment are vastly more humane than the get-sick-and-die-broke attitude in the United States that's, for some disgusting reason, a point of pride for an enormous number of people.
 
Upvote
14 (15 / -1)
The Biden administration's approach to protectionism was not a bad idea; guardrail your economy from a foreign country looking to overtake a market from your own. You use that period of time to incentivize and ramp up your own production so that you can hopefully prepare yourself to remain competitive in the market.

The current administration undid all of that by rolling back all incentives, which has had the obvious effect of the auto industry pivoting away from an "all-in" approach to EVs. China has not slowed down their approach in the meantime, and if anything, has pressed down on the gas pedal (pun intended) even harder with EVs.

At this point, if the US manufacturers are just going to dabble in high-cost specialty/luxury-priced EVs and the US government isn't going to do anything to incentivize in the space, then you might as well just concede the loss, allow China to take over the auto industry, and allow US consumers to buy the cars while they're still cheap. China will, inevitably, begin raising prices once they have captured the market, but if the US isn't going to do anything to protect itself from that...then oh well.
 
Upvote
17 (18 / -1)