On the one hand, they sold almost 4 million copies of that game. On the other, the throwaway sequel most likely never broke a million. Making that particular demo a paid digital title was definitely a choice.Switch 2 Welcome Tour seems like a great free pack-in title to onboard folks in the vein of Astro's Playroom for PS5. Wait, it's not a free pack-in title? You're doing this again, Nintendo? Didn't you learn anything from 1-2 Switch? /sigh
This was my exact reaction when I saw "Paid download". Really Nintendo? You went and spent the time to develop an entire game/learning experience around the Switch 2, so people can know how the system works and how to use it, and then you... charge extra for it. Pretty much ensuring no one is going to bother.Switch 2 Welcome Tour seems like a great free pack-in title to onboard folks in the vein of Astro's Playroom for PS5. Wait, it's not a free pack-in title? You're doing this again, Nintendo? Didn't you learn anything from 1-2 Switch? /sigh
I’m excited for new first party GameCube controllers. I still prefer them, especially for Smash, and the PowerA versions only last 3-6 months before a button or stick starts getting wonky.
Basically yes. But the same applies to a state‘s sale tax as wellBTW how does VAT work? I've been wondering the past couple weeks if it's similar to if the US had a flat 20% tariff on everything from everywhere, and that 20% was passed on 1:1 to the consumer?
The Euro price includes VAT, though, doesn’t it?I see Eurogamer talking euro and pound prices, I wonder if the US price is being withheld because of the tariff mess.
Edit: looking like it'll be $500 USD if the conversions hold and the tariffs don't result in a markup.
Yeah, VAT is equivalent to our state/local sales tax.Basically yes. But the same applies to a state‘s sale tax as well
VAT is already included in the price. Without the German VAT of 19% the proce would be €380 or about $414.
LCD display
Yeah, VAT is equivalent to our state/local sales tax.
Except
1) It’s constant across the EU instead of skewing the markets by people being able to go buy things cheaper in nearby jurisdictions, and meaning online merchants don’t need expensive systems for managing calculation/collection for different jurisdictions.
2) The chained collection system allows for better enforcement.
3) Tourists can get their VAT refunded, as it’s considered a residents’ tax.
4) Probably other things I’m not thinking of.
No, it's not. Each country has its own VAT rates.Yeah, VAT is equivalent to our state/local sales tax.
Except
1) It’s constant across the EU instead of skewing the markets by people being able to go buy things cheaper in nearby jurisdictions, and meaning online merchants don’t need expensive systems for managing calculation/collection for different jurisdictions.

They had no choice, really. If they priced it the same as other countries, no one in their domestic market could afford it. The value of the yen has cratered, but there has been minimal inflation and wage rises. On the other hand, if the Japanese console was cheaper and could play other regions' games, the scalpers would go on a feeding frenzy exporting the console to other markets, so the domestic market still wouldn't get access.I think there’s many points to appreciate about the new switch, including that the price has not increased by that much considering inflation, but it still leaves a sour taste in my mouth that they are re-introducing region locking with the new Japan discount. Feels like a step backwards.
The FromSoft reveal was a pretty long trailer, but it was towards the end (and well after the Elden Ring port reveal, for some reason).Didn’t watch the presentation, will probably skim it later. I’ll be waiting an extra year or two to pick up some white or special edition version of the console, but wow am I surprised to hear about a FROM Software exclusive. Given that nobody above is buzzing about this, I’m guessing it wasn’t given much airtime in the reveal?
Duskbloods + the usual Metroid/Zelda/Mario stuff would normally make this a day 1 system seller purchase, if not for the fact I still have a large backlog of top-shelf games that include finishing the vanilla Elden Ring experience, base Cyberpunk, Witcher 3, and around a dozen or so Switch games still sitting in their shrink wrap.
Maybe I’ll get around to finishing most of those before Playstation 7 and Switch 4.![]()
May be just-in-time before everything grinds to a halt. I expect they'll have a bunch of inventory stocked now, and once gone, suddenly becomes more scarce than the PS5 was at its dearthiest.Nintendo is sadly probably waiting to announce the price because of the looming Trump tariffs...
VAT, or Value Added Tax, is more like sales tax. But as the name implies, it's a tax only on the value added to something. If you buy €100 of steel (which has VAT already baked in from all the previous steps) and make something from that steel and sellnit for €20 markup, VAT is only added to the €20 of value you added. So in the US where that would ring up as anywhere from $120 to like $140ish depending on sales tax, with a 20% VAT it will become a €124 product. The difference from sales tax is that VAT is applied at every step along the way where sales tax only applies when the consumer buys the final product. That's why you only tax on the value added, so the government isn't double/triple/quadruple dipping. It kinda removes the complexity of deciding if sales tax needs to be levied or not when something is sold. But in the end, it ends up the same. 20% added to the final cost or 20% added at each step, but only to the added value means the government is collecting the same amount. All that changes is how it's collected (at each step, so there's no worrying about if something should be taxed or not depending on who the buyer is) and how much money each intermediary has to front to hold inventory.BTW how does VAT work? I've been wondering the past couple weeks if it's similar to if the US had a flat 20% tariff on everything from everywhere, and that 20% was passed on 1:1 to the consumer?
Thanks for the correction. Still less market skewing than each town sometimes having a different rate, though.No, it's not. Each country has its own VAT rates.
When I buy something from Amazon in Germany, it removes its German VAT and applies my (higher) VAT from the Netherlands.
Here's a site with all the rates in one go: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/value-added-tax-vat-rates-europe/
To explicate this part, as I understand it: Only the final customer is responsible for the VAT, so at every intermediate step in production the business takes a tax credit to offset the tax they're paying.Yeah, VAT is equivalent to our state/local sales tax.
Except
...
2) The chained collection system allows for better enforcement.
...
One of the values of the each step system of VAT is in enforcement. As products move through the supply chain, each buy/seller reports the transaction. The government can then track through the whole chain, right to the final sale. In a straight sales tax system, from the perspective of what gets reported to the taxing authority, it’s just the retailer reporting what they sold. There’s no report the tax authority could simply link up algorithmically to check that what the retailer claims they sold is the same amount they bought. (They’d have to get that info through a specific audit.)VAT, or Value Added Tax, is more like sales tax. But as the name implies, it's a tax only on the value added to something. If you buy €100 of steel (which has VAT already baked in from all the previous steps) and make something from that steel and sellnit for €20 markup, VAT is only added to the €20 of value you added. So in the US where that would ring up as anywhere from $120 to like $140ish depending on sales tax, with a 20% VAT it will become a €124 product. The difference from sales tax is that VAT is applied at every step along the way where sales tax only applies when the consumer buys the final product. That's why you only tax on the value added, so the government isn't double/triple/quadruple dipping. It kinda removes the complexity of deciding if sales tax needs to be levied or not when something is sold. But in the end, it ends up the same. 20% added to the final cost or 20% added at each step, but only to the added value means the government is collecting the same amount. All that changes is how it's collected (at each step, so there's no worrying about if something should be taxed or not depending on who the buyer is) and how much money each intermediary has to front to hold inventory.
Which is better? I don't know. But most of the world uses VAT instead of sales tax, so it must work pretty ok. From the consumer perspective, it doesn't really matter.
As I'm on the other side and have no experience with sales tax... how does that work with materials that are bought by a manufacturer? Does he have to pay sales tax on them as well?One of the values of the each step system of VAT is in enforcement. As products move through the supply chain, each buy/seller reports the transaction. The government can then track through the whole chain, right to the final sale. In a straight sales tax system, from the perspective of what gets reported to the taxing authority, it’s just the retailer reporting what they sold. There’s no report the tax authority could simply link up algorithmically to check that what the retailer claims they sold is the same amount they bought. (They’d have to get that info through a specific audit.)
Communists use VAT, though, not real capitalists like us Americans. /s
I'm most excited to hear about the SoC and if it's coming to a new version of the Nvidia Shield.
It certainly seems like a more sensible system to me, but I can imagine the crying from retailers of their inventory cost a little bit more up front to stock.One of the values of the each step system of VAT is in enforcement. As products move through the supply chain, each buy/seller reports the transaction. The government can then track through the whole chain, right to the final sale. In a straight sales tax system, from the perspective of what gets reported to the taxing authority, it’s just the retailer reporting what they sold. There’s no report the tax authority could simply link up algorithmically to check that what the retailer claims they sold is the same amount they bought. (They’d have to get that info through a specific audit.)
Communists use VAT, though, not real capitalists like us Americans. /s
...have opted to share gameplay data,...
My friend, it has been two full generations of console gaming since Nvidia did anything of note with the Shield/Portable brand. It's dead and gone.I would have considered it for $350. $450 is a hard pass. I haven't owned any Nintendo console since the Wii tho, and I've also been playing more board games than I have video games lately.
I'm most excited to hear about the SoC and if it's coming to a new version of the Nvidia Shield.
If you get the Year in Review emails, you are already sharing your gameplay data.I can't be the only one that's alarmed by this being part of the selection criteria, can I? It just feels all kinds of wrong (especially as I've just read Nate's article that includes a bit about LG TVs all snooping on us)
The way I see it is they wanted to prioritize the 120 hz for some reason. 120hz, HDR and OLED would jack the price even higher than it already is. Personally I would have preferred 60hz 1080p with OLED (hdr optional) but that ship has sailedPretty happy overall with the console. The price could be lower, but inflation-adjusted (and tariff-uncertainty-adjusted) it's not as bad as it could have been.
What really is missing is the OLED screen. I have both an LCD and OLED Switch 1, and the OLED version is a massive improvement. I'm sure they'll eventually release an OLED Switch 2, but in the meantime the regression is annoying.
And the fact that it seems unless they're patched, Switch 1 titles run exactly the same via back compat is a bummer.
In addition to Nintendo Switch 2 Edition games, select Nintendo Switch games may also take advantage of the system's new capabilities* to bring benefits like improved graphics and faster loading times.
VRR is confirmed in the specs: https://www.nintendo.com/us/gaming-systems/switch-2/tech-specs/The Shield is dead Jim.
I was kinda shocked the screen was 120/hdr. VRR would be nice.
Yeah and the hall effect stuff. Maybe it's in there who knows.
Price kinda high but nothing is getting cheaper or keeping up with salaries. Just spend more more more more.
I'll wait and see. I haven't played the Switch since last year and I barely play the PS5/Deck so I can wait.
Besides my Switch, the only portable gaming console I use regularly is my G Cloud to stream my Xbox, and that was $200.I'm a huge fan of the Switch and Nintendo in general, but I found this...underwhelming? No doubt I'll eventually get a Switch 2, but I'm not going to be in a rush for it. I already have a massive library for the Switch to play through, and nothing they've shown here seems that compelling to me. Plus the price is definitely higher than I was expecting, especially for what you get. Maybe I'm getting old...