Dirty deeds in Denver: Ex-prosecutor faked texts, destroyed devices to frame colleague

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,632
Subscriptor
"She had even, she added, gone to the local Apple Store in an attempt to retrieve the data on the devices."

So, just to put a cherry on top of everything, isn't pretty much every visit to the Apple Store for this sort of thing done by appointment? What did the Apple Store records show in support of her claim?
 
Upvote
132 (133 / -1)

AusPeter

Ars Praefectus
5,266
Subscriptor
You have to believe the police is seriously stupid to believe this has any chance of working.
In the long run it won't work because digital forensics. But .... serious damage could have been done to actual victim if the texts were leaked into the court of public pitchforks and torches.

And there were actual damages to the victim as can be seen by

For his part, Hines is upset about how he was treated during the whole situation and has filed a lawsuit of his own against the DA's office, believing that he was initially seen as a guilty party even in the absence of evidence.
 
Upvote
241 (242 / -1)
Hines is upset about how he was treated during the whole situation and has filed a lawsuit of his own against the DA's office, believing that he was initially seen as a guilty party even in the absence of evidence.

I mean, isn't that the whole MO of the position and department? Prosecutors assume guilt and act as adversary to any defense?
 
Upvote
67 (88 / -21)
It's hard to fathom why someone that invested 5-6 years of their life (and several hundred thousands of dollars) to become a lawyer would piss it all away by trying to squeeze a settlement out of a DA and/or the Denver DA's office. So either this person is astonishingly dumb for a law school graduate or had some sort of serious beef with her colleague.
 
Upvote
239 (239 / 0)

AusPeter

Ars Praefectus
5,266
Subscriptor
I mean, isn't that the whole MO of the position and department? Prosecutors assume guilt and act as adversary to any defense?
But then there is the whole

Hines denied it and nothing could be proven, but he was still transferred to another unit.

(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
 
Upvote
93 (100 / -7)

Maestro4k

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,561
The worst part of this is all of the people who legit are harassed and now won't be believed.
No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.
 
Upvote
-39 (126 / -165)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

the.mighty.oracle

Ars Scholae Palatinae
755
No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.
The worst part is definitely the party that got victimized by the fraud. Perhaps you just have a bit of a bias...
 
Upvote
180 (205 / -25)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,754
Subscriptor++
One suspects she didn't intend the police to become involved; probably she was just trying to trash this person's career?
Inappropriate workplace conduct isn't a police matter absent a crime such as sexual assault being alleged. I suspect these were internal DA investigators. Checking the article's link to the Denver paper, that story included "Hines felt the agency’s internal investigation was incomplete. Leadership in the office insinuated that Choi should be believed and was courageous for coming forward about the allegations, he said."

It also says the matter was referred for criminal investigation but charges were not filed.

Either way, a good reminder to avoid romantic entanglements in the workplace. Even assuming mutual interest at one point, if/when a relationship sours, it's like botulism. The organism is dead but the poison remains.
 
Upvote
118 (120 / -2)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,632
Subscriptor
The worst part of this is all of the people who legit are harassed and now won't be believed.
I think just the opposite. Because this case, in the end, relied on actual evidence to prove the accusations were false. Evidence-based prosecution and defense are, after all, what we want, and the system worked well here in the end.

The initial transfer wasn't handled well, but again I think in the end that, too, will be settled by fact once Hines' lawsuit proceeds.
 
Upvote
108 (111 / -3)

d_cooper

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
132
No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.
No single person should be trusted on their word. Men, women, children.. all have biases and reasons for bending the truth or outright lying to benefit themselves. Society understood this at one point.

Just as the article describes, whether we like it or not there are mountains of data now on anything electronic we engage in and combine that with all the tools available cheaply now to record our lives in various ways, there is no reason an accusation from anyone should make it past the starting line without evidence beyond 'he said/she said'. Verbal claims should never be actionable on their own. Glad he is suing, glad she was disbarred, and hope this does have a chilling effect on anyone else thinking to ride the coat-tails of MeToo for their own benefit.
 
Upvote
142 (149 / -7)

orwelldesign

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,322
Subscriptor++
(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?

So, I can offer a tangential situation. Once upon a time, I called the police to a DV situation. I called the police. My first wife (we had a marriage that was "fraught" on the best days, and way, way worse than "fraught" on the worst) had been drinking. Heavily. So had I, but I'm more a sleepy drunk than an angry one, but she, may she rest in peace, was an angry drunk.

So I called the police. Because she'd been throwing things, which I had been okay with until it started being kitchen knives. Throw an ashtray at me? Whatever. A plate? Not great. Bowl, pot, whatever.

But knives? That's a solid HELL NO from the Orwell camp.

So I called the police. Not knowing that if the police get called to a DV situation, someone's getting arrested, at least in California. Guaranteed, someone is getting arrested.

Turns out, the police do heavily favor the woman in these situations. We're both pretty drunk, but she's calmed down by the time they got there, and I was pretty calm to begin with.

But I got arrested anyway.

Because "something" had to change in the situation.

So if someone's going to get moved when there's an accusation, it's probably going to be the accused, not the accuser. I don't know if someone must get moved. No idea if that's DA office policy. But if it is, that's going to be the accused way more often than it's going to be the accuser.
 
Upvote
165 (170 / -5)

Mothringer

Smack-Fu Master, in training
86
It's funny, but law school doesn't seem to offer "ethics" even as an elective.
They do, but Alan Dershowitz is the kind of person that teaches those classes, with predictable results, as seen relatively recently when legal podcaster P Andrew Torrez, who used to make bad jokes about taking ethics from Dershowitz was later revealed to be a sex pest himself.
 
Upvote
32 (40 / -8)

azazel1024

Ars Legatus Legionis
15,219
Subscriptor
But then there is the whole



(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
Because if it ever is substantiated, Choi has a MASSIVE lawsuit on her hands for retaliation.

That is the problem with this, you shit in the water, SOMEONE is drinking it. If an accusation is made, someone almost certainly has a lawsuit against someone at that point. Whether the allegation is true/substantiated, or not.

If no one is moved, same issue. Unfortunately, Mr Hines probably doesn't have a strong lawsuit against the DA. He will have to prove damages. Simply being moved is likely not enough and isn't likely going to be considered retaliation or creating a hostile work environment. Now, what might have happened after the 2nd round of accusations would be really important. Or if Mr Hines can show his career advancement was impacted by how the DA's office handled it.

But many employers have HR policies that if an accusation is made, someone gets moved. Even if it isn't substantiated.
 
Upvote
96 (97 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
It's hard to fathom why someone that invested 5-6 years of their life (and several hundred thousands of dollars) to become a lawyer would piss it all away by trying to squeeze a settlement out of a DA and/or the Denver DA's office. So either this person is astonishingly dumb for a law school graduate or had some sort of serious beef with her colleague.

I'm willing to bet both are the case here.
 
Upvote
52 (52 / 0)

Mad Klingon

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,888
Subscriptor++
But then there is the whole



(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
Even somewhat post #MeToo, the woman is assumed to be the victim, especially in a Blue area like Denver. Lacking evidence, the male is pretty much boned. He was punished for one alleged verbal inappropriate comment. Lucky for him in this case, there was sufficient evidence to back his side of it.
 
Upvote
31 (55 / -24)

Socks Mingus

Ars Scholae Palatinae
999
Hines, she said at first, made an inappropriate remark to her. Hines denied it and nothing could be proven, but he was still transferred to another unit.

Feels like there's a step missing there, like some kind of mediation, or that the bar should have been higher than a single remark (unless they voluntarily agreed to the transfer as an expedient resolution). That might have also helped them suss out the BS or be more attentive to concerning behavioral patterns.

OTOH with someone in such bad faith and willing to outright lie, can imagine that actually trying to address the conflict might have made it even worse .

uggh, glad I'm not in HR
 
Upvote
41 (43 / -2)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,632
Subscriptor
First, she said, she managed to drop her phone into a filled bathtub. When she pulled the phone out of the water and found it was not working, Choi went to her laptop in order to make a video call. When the call ended, Choi then knocked over a bottle of water—whoops!—directly onto the computer, which was also taken out of commission. So, when the day came to hand in her devices, neither was working.

"My dog ate my emails!"
 
Upvote
56 (56 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Derecho Imminent

Ars Legatus Legionis
16,493
Subscriptor
Upvote
58 (58 / 0)