"Ms. Choi had texted the inappropriate messages to herself," according to the Times. "In addition, she changed the name in her phone to make it appear as though Mr. Hines was the one who had sent them."
In the long run it won't work because digital forensics. But .... serious damage could have been done to actual victim if the texts were leaked into the court of public pitchforks and torches.You have to believe the police is seriously stupid to believe this has any chance of working.
For his part, Hines is upset about how he was treated during the whole situation and has filed a lawsuit of his own against the DA's office, believing that he was initially seen as a guilty party even in the absence of evidence.
Hines is upset about how he was treated during the whole situation and has filed a lawsuit of his own against the DA's office, believing that he was initially seen as a guilty party even in the absence of evidence.
One suspects she didn't intend the police to become involved; probably she was just trying to trash this person's career?You have to believe the police is seriously stupid to believe this has any chance of working.
But then there is the wholeI mean, isn't that the whole MO of the position and department? Prosecutors assume guilt and act as adversary to any defense?
Hines denied it and nothing could be proven, but he was still transferred to another unit.
No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.The worst part of this is all of the people who legit are harassed and now won't be believed.
I missed that. Good point.(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
Believe it or not, there is an ethics component to the bar exam.It's funny, but law school doesn't seem to offer "ethics" even as an elective.
Or you have to be seriously stupid to believe the police are this stupid.You have to believe the police is seriously stupid to believe this has any chance of working.
The worst part is definitely the party that got victimized by the fraud. Perhaps you just have a bit of a bias...No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.
Oh noes!"I’m devastated that I may have tanked the investigation on my own, but that I also lost all of my personal data that were very important to me," Choi wrote to investigators.
Inappropriate workplace conduct isn't a police matter absent a crime such as sexual assault being alleged. I suspect these were internal DA investigators. Checking the article's link to the Denver paper, that story included "Hines felt the agency’s internal investigation was incomplete. Leadership in the office insinuated that Choi should be believed and was courageous for coming forward about the allegations, he said."One suspects she didn't intend the police to become involved; probably she was just trying to trash this person's career?
I think just the opposite. Because this case, in the end, relied on actual evidence to prove the accusations were false. Evidence-based prosecution and defense are, after all, what we want, and the system worked well here in the end.The worst part of this is all of the people who legit are harassed and now won't be believed.
Well, the police do tend to find a way to be stupid when it suits them. The phrase "strategic incompetence" comes to mindOr you have to be seriously stupid to believe the police are this stupid.
Dirty Deeds, Done Dirt Dumb!Or you have to be seriously stupid to believe the police are this stupid.
No single person should be trusted on their word. Men, women, children.. all have biases and reasons for bending the truth or outright lying to benefit themselves. Society understood this at one point.No, the worst part is all the male's rights assholes will point to this case as "proof" that all women are making false sexual harassment claims. The reality is that the number of false claims are low, are nearly always caught (although not necessarily without causing some damage, as in this case) and far too many real victims never even speak up.
The police aren't always drawing from the deep end of the gene pool. (Apologies to Al Bester, Psi Corp).Well, the police do tend to find a way to be stupid when it suits them. The phrase "strategic incompetence" comes to mind
(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
They do, but Alan Dershowitz is the kind of person that teaches those classes, with predictable results, as seen relatively recently when legal podcaster P Andrew Torrez, who used to make bad jokes about taking ethics from Dershowitz was later revealed to be a sex pest himself.It's funny, but law school doesn't seem to offer "ethics" even as an elective.
Because if it ever is substantiated, Choi has a MASSIVE lawsuit on her hands for retaliation.But then there is the whole
(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
It's hard to fathom why someone that invested 5-6 years of their life (and several hundred thousands of dollars) to become a lawyer would piss it all away by trying to squeeze a settlement out of a DA and/or the Denver DA's office. So either this person is astonishingly dumb for a law school graduate or had some sort of serious beef with her colleague.
Even somewhat post #MeToo, the woman is assumed to be the victim, especially in a Blue area like Denver. Lacking evidence, the male is pretty much boned. He was punished for one alleged verbal inappropriate comment. Lucky for him in this case, there was sufficient evidence to back his side of it.But then there is the whole
(emphasis mine).. Why was he moved and not Choi?
Hines, she said at first, made an inappropriate remark to her. Hines denied it and nothing could be proven, but he was still transferred to another unit.
First, she said, she managed to drop her phone into a filled bathtub. When she pulled the phone out of the water and found it was not working, Choi went to her laptop in order to make a video call. When the call ended, Choi then knocked over a bottle of water—whoops!—directly onto the computer, which was also taken out of commission. So, when the day came to hand in her devices, neither was working.
I'm willing to bet both are the case here.
So far, these are all civil infringements, not criminal infringements.Where is her jailtime?!
Since 1974, legal ethics instruction has been required in law schools byIt's funny, but law school doesn't seem to offer "ethics" even as an elective.