It is nice to know that they served a useful purpose, albeit not the original design purpose.The soviets had tracking ships to provide coverage. Contact referenced them. Guess they were sold off for mega yachts and hookers.
Do they? I know the Soviets had several such ships. But I thought they most capable one (Nedelin class, I think) were retired long ago and not replaced. What sort of ship-based, deep space communications assets do the Russians currently have?
Well, I guess Ars actually does exist in the cloud. The incoherent yelling at it makes more sense now.I turned 60 last week.
Russia is engaging in crimes against humanity on a scale not seen since WWII, and according to you we're just supposed to ignore it. That ain't happening on my end, and thankfully not for the great many others who support Ukraine.Ignore politics. Really, it's hard to do because everything is rubbing politics into your brain, but ignore it. In the end you will realize anyway that it has been the least important thing in your life. You're just being used. Engineering is much more rewarding. Numbers don't lie. What you've learned this way will never be wrong. You'll be able to work with everyone who has worked with the same stuff. Facts are facts. Lies are lies.
Keep telling yourself that. It's a bunch of crap but, hey, since you seem to need a binkie to cling to that'll do as well as anything else. In the meantime, let the adults in the conversation alone will ya?Engineering is much more rewarding. Numbers don't lie. What you've learned this way will never be wrong. You'll be able to work with everyone who has worked with the same stuff. Facts are facts. Lies are lies.
Serious question. What is the point of using an AI generator to craft a comment? Do you not actually have anything to say, but still want to be a part of the conversation? Or are you trying to plug that website (which I have redacted)?The loss of Luna 25 is a major setback for Russia's lunar exploration aspirations, and it highlights the challenges and risks inherent in space missions. It also underscores the need for a robust and reliable infrastructure for deep space communication, which is crucial for the success of future lunar missions. The Russian space program will likely face increased scrutiny and pressure to address these issues as it moves forward with its lunar exploration plans. Comment courtesy: blah blah.com
You cannot outrun a bad diet.Ignore politics. Really, it's hard to do because everything is rubbing politics into your brain, but ignore it. In the end you will realize anyway that it has been the least important thing in your life. You're just being used. Engineering is much more rewarding. Numbers don't lie. What you've learned this way will never be wrong. You'll be able to work with everyone who has worked with the same stuff. Facts are facts. Lies are lies.
* hug *I don't even understand what you're meaning to say with this, but I'm Ok with this because I think you all don't understand the stakes we're at anyway. And I don't care anymore. Throw your fucking shit and believe in it making a difference.
We're fucking up this planet and our civilization and most us of seem to think this is the right way to deal with the problem we're being dealt. No. We need to understand how we are failing, not to continue to do so.
And yes, if you don't understand what I am saying, you're a part of the problem. And you will realize this only when you fail to stop the problem rolling over you. And it is rolling over you, isn't it?
Life would be so much easier if that were true. Or rather life would be much harder. I've seen lots of presentations on planetary protection and outer solar system missions. You aren't allowed to assume even a 5 km/s impact velocity would melt (and therefore sterilize) everything. Some parts are going to be blown off and land nearby, solid and sort of intact.Not turned to plasma. That would be the case from TLI entry I suspect. In LLO, you're only getting the other outcomes.
2 km/s is 2 MJ/kg kinetic energy. The heat of fusion of aluminum is only 321 J/kg and the latent heat of vaporization is 0.7 MJ/kg. Some of the kinetic energy will go into accelerating the regolith. So some of the aluminum won't turn to gas. But essentially all of it will turn to liquid - and hot liquid at that (never mind the propellant). So yeah, hot liquid with a high pressure stagnation point will lead to an expanding pressure wave that will atomize the aluminum.
I get that the world is spiralling into chaos and pain, and the answer is not hate, but I don't think talking about the science and engineering of a propaganda probe would help the world one iota. It would take large doses of willfully ignoring reality, if even there was anything to talk about beyond a golden blanket with a flag on it. (Not that I could talk about it beyond this level, just my observation.)I don't even understand what you're meaning to say with this, but I'm Ok with this because I think you all don't understand the stakes we're at anyway. And I don't care anymore. Throw your fucking shit and believe in it making a difference.
We're fucking up this planet and our civilization and most us of seem to think this is the right way to deal with the problem we're being dealt. No. We need to understand how we are failing, not to continue to do so.
And yes, if you don't understand what I am saying, you're a part of the problem. And you will realize this only when you fail to stop the problem rolling over you. And it is rolling over you, isn't it?
I checked. The IAU convention is to name lunar craters after explorers, scientists and engineers who were involved in planetary science or spaceflight. The homework assignment is now to find a Russian who fits that description and came to a very bad end. Maybe someone killed in the purges and not rehabilitated.After their victory, I am dreaming about a future Ukrainian Moon‑landing mission. Preferably to the very same spot Luna‑25 crashed into, raising a niceflag there. Heck, they might get to even name the recent impact crater...
LO-fucking-L! You care so little you have to respond to every little post whining like a ry-adult. So mature. Such grown up!I think I'm about 10 times more adult than you and the proof of this is that I don't care.
Yeah, I'm less than a decade behind ya, pal, and I've actually put my life on the line to put a stop to shit like Putin is now engaging in before. What the fuck have you ever done?You will have to punch yourself through as many decades and changes as I did. Good luck, boy. Good luck. You'll need it.
Nothing wrong with British cheese, especially when you chase it down a hill.(I'll go get my coat and make a hastyFrenchBritish exit)
Have you? You literally laid your life on the line in defense of this sort of thing? for all 60-ish of your years alive?! That's shocking considering how much you claim to be purely reasoning with numbers in an engineering role.I've staked all my fucking live against it, not just a job.
I'm sure you could close the link that way. But the data rate would be painfully low. And, since we were talking about sending bogus commands to a spacecraft, you'd need to match the data rate it was expecting to receive and demodulate.Not really. I mean, yes sort of, but with the right atmospheric conditions, you can bounce VHF off the moon to communicate with the other side of the Earth using HAM legal equipment and power levels. You don't need the DSN to talk to the moon, even with relatively low fain antennas on whatever is on or around the moon. Of course the lower the gain on the lunar end, the higher the gain needed on Earth.
But if you are running a frequency where the ionosphere is transparent, the gain and power levels aren't necessary mind boggling for low modularity communications. Mars is something like 200-1,000x further than the Moon necessitating around 15-20dB higher gain for the same radio power. The moon is about the same 1000x further than low earth orbit. And a handheld 5w radio with a modest antenna can talk to stuff in orbit okay. So you are talking ~20dB higher gain if still using a piddly 5w radio power. Not that hard to do.
Au contraire - the definition of a landing is a crash you can walk away fromThat seems to meet the definition of landing on the moon. They successfully won the race against Chandrayaan-3.
You really need to read up on your post-WW2 history. It's makes for extremely depressing reading, but the current war in Ukraine isn't even top 10 material.Russia is engaging in crimes against humanity on a scale not seen since WWII
Shame they didn’t get a chance to try out their polar exploration suit. Here’s the press photo, in case you missed it![]()
Processed cheese is a regional name enforced by law.Plus we don’t have those weird regional naming restrictions. Mostly.
Bonus points if said Russian was defenestrated.I checked. The IAU convention is to name lunar craters after explorers, scientists and engineers who were involved in planetary science or spaceflight. The homework assignment is now to find a Russian who fits that description and came to a very bad end. Maybe someone killed in the purges and not rehabilitated.
The Apollo ALSP seismometer might have been able to do it, but they haven't been operational for a very long time. In theory, the impact site can be imaged from orbit, but we don't have any idea where the impact site is. This wasn't a failed landing. They botched and orbital maneuver in preparation for landing and put the thing on some random orbit which hit the surface at some random place.Out of curiosity, are there any sensors on the moon that would have detected the impact in general? Or would it be noise compared to what else is going on in the moon (assuming said sensors actually exist)
Apathy doesn't signal maturity.I think I'm about 10 times more adult than you and the proof of this is that I don't care.
OK, everything has its time and Ars had its time and I have to pull myself out of it before it is wasting more of my time than I can afford to waste these days.
Ars for a long time was a sober place to discuss even complex and very difficult things. Then it became popular and basically became what Slashdot was before and now is turning into what Slashdot has become.
I turned 60 last week. I was six years old when mankind made it to the Moon, I saw this live on TV and I remember it and I only realized in the last one or two decades how much this was a thing that really set the limit of what we can do if we really try.
And now I have to see how we still fail at the simplest things, like fucking animals. Fuck all you fucking fuckers.
Exactly. Специальная Внеземная Операция (СВО) (special outer-Terran operation)Moscow reports mission is complete success. Because it is not moon landing, it is Special Moon Operation.
It would be nice if other countries could learn the lesson that orienting a country to prop up billionaires doesn’t end well, but alas. The billionaires own the presses.When you give half your country's GDP to like a dozen oligarchs it might make it difficult to function as a nation? Who'd have thought.
Well, I can because there is a deli a couple blocks from my apartment and the owner is Norman French. He imports the cheeses for me. Seriously, there are some very good American cheeses. But there are also some very, very bad American cheese. And I think we have to pasteurize everything, which limits the variety. (And I don't think I've ever seen fromage blanc in the US.)Oh don’t give me that nonsense. First off, processed cheese is still cheese. I’ve seen it made.
Second, I can get better “European” cheeses in America than I can import from across the pond.
Is it because of Russia's terrible leadership? If so, may I remind folks that, right now, idiotic Trump, and crooked Joe Biden, are the two leading contestants for the White House! That's not exactly inspiring.
And if it is because of Russian adventurism in Ukraine, may I remind folks that the US Government isnt much better in that respect. Even as we speak, the US & the French are, for example, quietly orchestrating a potentially devastating conflict in the Sahel, and notably in the Republic of Niger.