Hacker called Doomed delights as First Amendment debate stokes chaos on Twitter.
See full article...
See full article...
When you’re desperate to show that people want your product, give it away to celebrities … without even telling the celebrities you’re doing it. It’s right out of the Bowfinger school of celebrity endorsements.
Not only that, the "your kid should be able to help you with your computer" stopped being a thing like a decade ago.They can believe what they want. It doesn't make it legal.
"Your niece or nephew who's good with computers is a much safer (and cheaper) bet."
HAHAHAHA. Right... besides the fact that I am not that old, I am the computer literate one in my family. But... why did you feel the need to make a crack about old people not being good with computers? Seems like a unneeded insult and assumption.
This sort of thing is gross, skeevy, and iniquitous. Reporting on hacked materials is protected and should be protected for a reason, and engaging in a cover-up is behaviour clearly opposed to the public interest. That was the case when it was former Twitter management censoring the New York Post for covering the Hunter Biden story, with the coverup at the behest of the Biden campaign, no less; I still remember a bunch of idiots on Twitter trying to claim that that story was fake news, same with the DNC hack. And it's the case for the current Twitter management censoring Wired for covering the Matt Walsh story, as well. And we all know who made this decision inside modern Twitter, and why: it was Musk, and he did it because self-described theocratic fascist Matt Walsh shares his disgusting transphobic views.
I hear Twitter is filming a TV commercial with Eddie Murphy. Here’s the BTS of the film crew at work:Gifting Twitter Blue to high profile people who were very against paying for it might be the first smart marketing decision Mush has made.
Now it looks like they broke down and paid. Doesn't matter if they post saying they didn't. His supporters can just point at the still existing checkmark and say, "See, they paid!"
Why should any high profile person pay knowing that Musk will foot the bill? How far down the line does this go? Seems like a crack in the payment dam that will only grow.Gifting Twitter Blue to high profile people who were very against paying for it might be the first smart marketing decision Mush has made.
Now it looks like they broke down and paid. Doesn't matter if they post saying they didn't. His supporters can just point at the still existing checkmark and say, "See, they paid!"
I'm sort of surprised Wired (and related publications) didn't proactively suspend activity on Twitter in response.This is easy. There’s a lot of wealthy people (and politicians, etc) who hate the media for looking into their business and hate that legal precedent curtails them from using their wealth to threaten said journalists and their investigations.
Legally Walsh doesn’t have a legal leg to stand on and Musk knows it. So he bans the reporter instead, sending a message to other journalists. I just surprised he didn’t suspend Wired as well.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/07/ron-desantis-freedom-of-the-press-florida
The point is that Musk is a lying liar who lies all the f@#$ing time (he's not even consistent within a single day), especially about the things he claims to value most (Free Speech), since he will happily violate those in an instant if it ends up being something he disagrees with.What exactly is your point?
What makes you think he decided this áfter finding out it isn't profitable?Don't you know? Musk controls ALL your speech, not just what you say on Twitter. Especially if you make jokes about him or his friends on the racist end of the political spectrum. They are protected by "free speech absolutism." But what makes you think you are?
I seriously believe that Musk has decided that if he cannot make money off of Twitter, he can at least turn it into the Elon Musk Admiration Society.
Which may actually turn out to be illegal. It gives the false impression that people like Stephen King are endorsing Twitter Blue.Just like giving some people blue checkmarks because he feels like it...
The number of views on their tweets are all over the place, but seem to average about 10,000 views each. I don't know how Twitter decides whether your tweet has been viewed or not (since it doesn't have to be as engaged as actually watching a 10-min video all the way through), but this implies a 1% engagement rate.
Musk's Twitter doing exactly the same thing they accused the previous Twitter owners of doing?
Man, it's almost as if his "unfettered free speech, public square, anything not illegal is allowed, no more censorship" jibba-jabba was just a lie that only stupid people (possibly including himself) believed.
It turns out, Musk really just loves banning journalists and picking fights with "liberal" news organizations at the behest of right-wing trolls who play him like a fiddle.
What... Freaking hell. Musk just continues to demonstrate how sad and pathetic he is, trying to placate celebrities who have criticized his decisions. The irony is, he just made those particular checkmarks status symbols, because the celebrities got them for free for no other discernible reason.
Update April 20th, 11:30PM ET: Added confirmation from Musk that he’s also paying to verify William Shatner and removed references to the rapper Ice T.
What... Freaking hell. Musk just continues to demonstrate how sad and pathetic he is, trying to placate celebrities who have criticized his decisions. The irony is, he just made those particular checkmarks status symbols, because the celebrities got them for free for no other discernible reason.
I'm also scratching my head at this note on the Verge article:
The Wired article may be paywalled but, fortunately, the Arstechnica article is not.I don't know who any of the people in this story are, but I found this bit interesting. Did someone clone this guy's cell phone? How did all MFA get bypassed?
I would RTFA, but the Wired article is paywalled.
Shatner Ice-T? I hardly know 'er!Who among us hasn't mixed up Shatner and Ice-T before?
I've mixed up Ice-T and lemonade before. That was embarrassing! People were calling me out about that one all day.Who among us hasn't mixed up Shatner and Ice-T before?
Google is your friend, use it. I didn't remember who he was initially, but one quick search is all it took to remind me. He's a self-described "Theocratic fascist", who spends a lot of time relying to posts on Twitter and writes books and magazine columns based on his personal opinions stated as if they were objective facts.who is matt walsh? what is the daily wire? who is dell cameron? oh i guess i should read the wired piece, and... the editor-in-chief of wired is named... Gideon Lichfield?!
That was so dumb.I've mixed up Ice-T and lemonade before. That was embarrassing! People were calling me out about that one all day.
Seems many here are thinking that it's Matt Walsh that got suspended with all the "good riddance" comments. HE'S still there, it was a journalist that reported on it that got suspended. Not the publication that printed it either, just the reporter. Why not the publication also?
It's just a bullshit thing that Musk did...because he can. Just like giving some people blue checkmarks because he feels like it, while taking away everyone else's.