Scientists analyzed tooth samples taken from skeletal remains of medieval victims.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Y. pestis has something of a reputation for remaining viable for centuries. I believe archaeologists have standard practices for dealing with plague pits for that reason.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
They take lots of precautions because it would really suck to do all that work and end up sequencing salmonella from the salad the researcher ate at lunch.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
They take lots of precautions because it would really suck to do all that work and end up sequencing salmonella from the salad the researcher ate at lunch.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
The DNA was identified by teams of scientists from Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA) and the Max Planck Institute in Germany. They studied the skeletons’ teeth, because enamel acts as a kind of time capsule in preserving the genetic information of any bacteria that was circulating in the individual’s bloodstream at the time of death. The bacteria itself perished shortly after its host did, 351 years ago, so the remains pose no risk today.
In August 2016, in a remote corner of Siberian tundra called the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic Circle, a 12-year-old boy died and at least twenty people were hospitalised after being infected by anthrax.
The theory is that, over 75 years ago, a reindeer infected with anthrax died and its frozen carcass became trapped under a layer of frozen soil, known as permafrost. There it stayed until a heatwave in the summer of 2016, when the permafrost thawed.
This exposed the reindeer corpse and released infectious anthrax into nearby water and soil, and then into the food supply. More than 2,000 reindeer grazing nearby became infected, which then led to the small number of human cases.
Wow, that Siberia case is interesting and a bit scary when one considers the thawing permafrost that will increase with Climate Change.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
Depends on the bacteria and environmental factors. I would imagine they would take precautions to avoid contamination of the samples using the same methods that would prevent exposing themselves to any active contagions.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ack-death/
The DNA was identified by teams of scientists from Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA) and the Max Planck Institute in Germany. They studied the skeletons’ teeth, because enamel acts as a kind of time capsule in preserving the genetic information of any bacteria that was circulating in the individual’s bloodstream at the time of death. The bacteria itself perished shortly after its host did, 351 years ago, so the remains pose no risk today.
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170504 ... -waking-up
In August 2016, in a remote corner of Siberian tundra called the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic Circle, a 12-year-old boy died and at least twenty people were hospitalised after being infected by anthrax.
The theory is that, over 75 years ago, a reindeer infected with anthrax died and its frozen carcass became trapped under a layer of frozen soil, known as permafrost. There it stayed until a heatwave in the summer of 2016, when the permafrost thawed.
This exposed the reindeer corpse and released infectious anthrax into nearby water and soil, and then into the food supply. More than 2,000 reindeer grazing nearby became infected, which then led to the small number of human cases.
and likely are among the few people the vaccine for it is distributed to (being something that can easily be converted into a bioweapon, the facilities that can make it are few, high security, and the vaccine itself is only distributed to a small number of people unless there's an outbreak)Y. pestis has something of a reputation for remaining viable for centuries. I believe archaeologists have standard practices for dealing with plague pits for that reason.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
So I suppose we've definitely pinned the Black Death on Y. pestis, then. I had heard a few years ago that some people were claiming it was actually a hemorrhagic fever of some sort, but, as usual, never heard any follow up on it.
i recall the story of a british diver in the early 20th c who spent 6 years ferrying bags of concrete under winchester cathedral, thereby stabilizing the foundation and preventing ruin. it was said that every day he feared contamination because of the graves nearby.... do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing?
Plagues don't do well with small isolated populations. You need cities full of people cheek by jowl. It helps of course if you have poor hygiene habits, and enough trade to vector infection from one to the next. One of the venerated saints (I don't recall which) decided that illness was a moral failing and could be cured by prayer, setting the course of medical advancement back by nearly a thousand years.i do wonder what plagues that burnt hot and fast in early human history that we will never know of. that are stuck atm in ice sheets
Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
"safest source for infection"? Interesting choice of words, oldman.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
Ironically, the long dead would probably be the safest source of infection for Y Pestis. Several antibiotics deal with it very well, but as usual antibiotic resistance is on the rise, and may become critical in the not too distant future. However, a 14th century bacterium would be readily slaughtered by those now failing antibiotics.
Miasmas were a popular diagnosis. But of course not as popular as witchcraft. Most people are unaware that the single most deadly disease on the planet has retained its miasmic name, malaria is literally latin for "bad air". Though you have to admit it rolls off the tongue easier than "aedes egyptii vectored plasmodium infection".
During plague years-- or times of dire famine, even-- parents tended not to name their newborn children until they'd survived the first year.I wonder about the social impacts such as how these people viewed life and death when you encountered a situation where one in 10 people died and I wonder how it impacted everyday life, the social order and etc.
true but you never know. seeing how some of this last so long buried.Plagues don't do well with small isolated populations. You need cities full of people cheek by jowl. It helps of course if you have poor hygiene habits, and enough trade to vector infection from one to the next. One of the venerated saints (I don't recall which) decided that illness was a moral failing and could be cured by prayer, setting the course of medical advancement back by nearly a thousand years.i do wonder what plagues that burnt hot and fast in early human history that we will never know of. that are stuck atm in ice sheets
I wonder about the social impacts such as how these people viewed life and death when you encountered a situation where one in 10 people died and I wonder how it impacted everyday life, the social order and etc.
the pandemic spread from a single entry point into Europe from the East—specifically, a Russian town called Laishev
Nothing good comes out of Russia.
There is a book by Sci-Fi author Kim Stanley Robinson called The Years of Rice and Salt.
It's an alternate history that explores the idea that the plagues simply wiped out European civilization and most of Christianity with it. It's terribly interesting involving multiple stories about the Chinese discovering and colonizing the Americas, enlightened Muslim scholars making the basic scientific breakthroughs of Newton and Einstein, among other things.
Very good reading.
The potential danger comes from bacterial spores in the pits and bodies but standard procedures (gardening gloves and surgical masks) suffice. Yersinia enters the human body either through parasites that carry it from rodents, or through inhalation - thus the pneumonic form.Y. pestis has something of a reputation for remaining viable for centuries. I believe archaeologists have standard practices for dealing with plague pits for that reason.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
So I suppose we've definitely pinned the Black Death on Y. pestis, then. I had heard a few years ago that some people were claiming it was actually a hemorrhagic fever of some sort, but, as usual, never heard any follow up on it.
In fact, it might have been even more devastating in the Middle East. An Egyptian scholar mentions twenty desert tribes simply "vanishing", while the Mamluks ended up filling ships with the dead and burning them offshore.There is a book by Sci-Fi author Kim Stanley Robinson called The Years of Rice and Salt.
It's an alternate history that explores the idea that the plagues simply wiped out European civilization and most of Christianity with it. It's terribly interesting involving multiple stories about the Chinese discovering and colonizing the Americas, enlightened Muslim scholars making the basic scientific breakthroughs of Newton and Einstein, among other things.
Very good reading.
I get that it's just a premise for the "What If?", but that never made sense to me. The Plague actually did hit the Middle East and North Africa at roughly the same time it hit Europe, with a similar death rate. It may have hit China in the 1330s, although it's hard to tell because the mid-14th century was just a disastrous period for China in general.
The plague is not dangerous anymore since the advent of antibiotics. And it is so old it doesn't have resistence to any of them.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
Even something which is highly treatable remains dangerous if it can kill folks who don't have good access to medicines such as antibiotics.The plague is not dangerous anymore since the advent of antibiotics. And it is so old it doesn't have resistence to any of them.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
According to the CDC, the mortality rate is around 11%, even with access to effective antibiotics.The plague is not dangerous anymore since the advent of antibiotics. And it is so old it doesn't have resistence to any of them.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
I assume that is because it goes unrecognized since it is so rare now, but yes that is lot higher than I expectedAccording to the CDC, the mortality rate is around 11%, even with access to effective antibiotics.The plague is not dangerous anymore since the advent of antibiotics. And it is so old it doesn't have resistence to any of them.Hm. I know these are long dead people, and you'd think all of the bacterium would have been completely dead. But do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing? Or are they just so broken down the only reason they can reconstruct the DNA is by massive sampling to get enough fragments which more or less overlap and complete the DNA coding?
Of course, there are a lot fewer cases these days, and mortality was 66% before modern antibiotics, but 11% mortality sounds like it's still dangerous.
i recall the story of a british diver in the early 20th c who spent 6 years ferrying bags of concrete under winchester cathedral, thereby stabilizing the foundation and preventing ruin. it was said that every day he feared contamination because of the graves nearby.... do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing?
edit: cathedral tribute
wtf??
i recall the story of a british diver in the early 20th c who spent 6 years ferrying bags of concrete under winchester cathedral, thereby stabilizing the foundation and preventing ruin. it was said that every day he feared contamination because of the graves nearby.... do archaeologists need to take special care, especially for known plague victims, in excavating and taking samples and analyzing?
edit: cathedral tribute
wtf??
What surprises me is that the other people in that streetview picture don't appear to have been made less recognisable through blurring. I thought that was standard practice?
Wow, that Siberia case is interesting and a bit scary when one considers the thawing permafrost that will increase with Climate Change.