Skip to content
jacked up wagons r great

Forgive me, Volvo, I was wrong: The 2025 V60 Cross Country review

Volvo’s midsize station wagon proves a real charmer.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 165
A Volvo V60 Cross Country seen head-on, in an alley
The last time I drove a V60 Cross Country I was wrong about it. Very very wrong. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin
The last time I drove a V60 Cross Country I was wrong about it. Very very wrong. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin
Story text

As we often like to remind people, beware buying any car in its first model year. It takes a little while for any OEM to find its feet with a new model, and now there’s half-baked software that can need frequent updating to worry about in addition to any mechanical woes. I bring this up because various bugs meant that an electric car we were supposed to review had to be repeatedly postponed, as it was away being fixed, and as a result our week with the 2025 Volvo V60 Cross Country turned into two. And what a pleasant two weeks they were.

The Volvo station wagon is not in its first production year. Any criticism of its onboard electronics would focus more on the fact that they are now increasingly vintage, but that also means the bugs have mostly been squashed by now. Sadly, Volvo killed off the regular V60 station wagon earlier this year, but you can still buy the Cross Country version, which starts at $51,495, including the delivery charge.

As the name probably implies, the V60 Cross Country has some adaptations for unpaved roads: it rides a little higher and on softer suspension, and there’s protective cladding here and there that gives this wagon a bit of a bold stance.

A Volvo V60 Cross Country parked in front of a mural, seen from the front 3/4s
I bet most XC60 buyers would be just as well-served with one of these.
A Volvo V60 Cross Country parked in front of a mural, seen from the rear 3/4s
Remind me again why the wagon died off?

At this point, I should probably apologize to Volvo. When I last drove a V60 Cross Country back in 2020, it seems I spectacularly missed the point of the car, going as far as to write that jacking up the ride height ruined the way it drove. The older, wiser me realizes that the slightly bouncy ride and light steering actually makes this a very nimble car, and you appreciate its supple nature on rough tarmac. So Volvo, I am very sorry I wrote that you ruined this car.

Things are only let down a bit by the powertrain, which is now Volvo’s B5 mild hybrid. It’s not that the 2.0 L turbocharged engine’s 247 hp (185 kW) and 268 lb-ft (198 Nm) is insufficient for the car’s needs. Rather, the eight-speed automatic transmission’s desire to change into as high a gear as possible as soon as possible, for better fuel efficiency, means that when you do need a burst of power you have to wait a bit for the ‘box to shuffle down through two or three gears. At least it’s a pleasant-sounding engine when it approaches its redline.

Perhaps if I was more patient I’d have gotten closer to the EPA combined 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km), too—instead the best I could average was 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km). One wonders how much lower it would be without the 48 V mild hybrid system.

A Volvo V60 Cross Country parked in alleyl, seen from the front 3/4s
The fascia got an update a few years ago.
A Volvo V60 Cross Country parked in an alley, seen from the rear
The last midsize station wagon?

While I am a big fan of the way the V60’s front seats look, they could do with quite a lot more lateral support. It definitely feels like you’re sat on them, not in them, if that makes sense. The $56,595 (including delivery charge) Ultra trim adds ventilation and a good massage function to the front seats, as well as options like the tan Nappa leather you see in the (not-great) photo. (Sadly Volvo’s media site didn’t have any good ones either.) Ultra also adds a heads-up display and a better sound system, although our test car was given an even better $3,200 Bowers and Wilkins sound upgrade.

Otherwise, the cabin is still much as it was five years ago. I appreciate the helpful features, like well-designed hooks in the cargo area that keep your shopping bags in place, which aren’t always as useful as the ones here. While the infotainment system is old and its screen is small by 2025’s standards, there are four USB-C ports in the car, and Google is built-in. There’s also Apple CarPlay, but you’ll need to use a cable. You’ll want to plug your phone in anyway, as there’s no wireless charging pad.

My biggest complaint about the V60 Cross Country is the over-eager rear emergency braking system. A large curb or bollard can trigger it, slamming on the anchors in the process, which is annoying when I am backing into a parking space at maybe 5 mph, but I understand why the safety-conscious automaker has programmed it the way it has. After two weeks with the car there was little else I could find to criticize, and I missed its agility, easy ride, and relatively reasonable size compared to the big electric SUVs that have taken its place in the testing schedule since.

Volvo V60 Cross Country interior
I am sorry this is such a poor photo.
Volvo V60 Cross Country rear cargo area with two reusable shopping bags full of groceries
There’s up to 60.5 cubic feet (1,713 L) of cargo volume.

Station wagon shopping in 2025 is a short process; once Audi stops selling the A4 Allroad, this V60 Cross Country has no real rival left. So it’s a good thing it’s a pretty decent example of the breed.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
165 Comments
Staff Picks
Aurich
"Remind me again why the wagon died off?"

Honestly, as much as I like wagons personally, I get it. Crossovers are really basically everything a wagon offers, but more convenient. Do they drive as nicely? No, but few people buying them are looking for driving dynamics or worrying about that slightly higher center of gravity.

Everything else is basically what you get from a wagon, but easier to load and unload, and what many feel is a more commanding driving position.

The difference between these two things is just not that stark:

wagon-vs-crossover.jpg

My wife drives the Mazda CX-5 and I like it just fine. She used to have a Passat Wagon, and the Mazda checks all the same boxes. But if we still had young kids and carseats like we did with the Passat the Mazda would have been easier on our backs.