Skip to content
more ICE

The EV transition hits some snags at Porsche and Audi

Audi upends its naming scheme (again), and Porsche plans more engines.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 139
Audi and Porsche badges
Credit: Aurich Lawson | Audi | Porsche
Credit: Aurich Lawson | Audi | Porsche
Story text

Life isn’t so easy for automotive manufacturers right now. Take Porsche, which just published preliminary financial numbers for last year and projections for 2025. While things aren’t Tesla levels of bad, they’re not exactly great. Sales were down 28 percent in China last year and 3 percent overall. Worse yet, profit margins are just over 10 percent, far below the 18 percent the company was targeting.

As a result, Porsche says it’s taking “extensive measures” to improve profitability, including adding more internal combustion and plug-in hybrid vehicles to go with the slow-selling EVs. All told, the company expects to spend $830 million (800 million euros) on expanding its non-battery EV lineup in 2025.

There’s a lot of that sort of thing going around. Last year, General Motors and Ford lamented missing where the market actually is with too many too-expensive EVs and not enough hybrids. And over at Porsche’s sister brand Audi, a similar realization set in, to the point that the brand developed a new combustion engine vehicle architecture (called PPC) to go alongside the new EV-only PPE platform. That new platform will presumably be welcomed over at Porsche as well.

Now Audi has gone a little further, abandoning its almost-new nomenclature in the process. As naming conventions go, Audi at least tried to keep things a little logical when it told everyone last summer that henceforth, odd-numbered Audis—A3, A5, Q5, Q7, and so on—would be internal combustion or hybrids, and even-numbered Audis—A4, A6, Q6, Q8—would be electric, or e-tron.

This was the case when we went to see some of those new Audis in the studio last summer. There was an all-new gasoline-powered A5, which comes in a handsome fastback sedan or even more handsome Avant (station wagon) version, that won’t come to the US.

There’s also an all-new, fully electric A6, available as a sedan but also as a handsome fastback sedan and even more handsome Avant. This one also isn’t coming to America.

As of this week, things are back to where they used to be. Forget the odd and even distinction; for now, it means nothing again. A gasoline-powered A6 will break cover on March 3, Audi says. And as for names? “A” means a low floor, and “Q” means a high floor (i.e., SUV or crossover).

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
139 Comments
Staff Picks
S
Porsche wants to build more ICE autos because their E-Auto business is lacking because their China revenue is falling because E-Auto giants like BYD, Nio and others increasing the competition pressure there with more, better autos in China. All the while China forcefully pushes E-Mobility.

How long do you have to sit in a closed room with a running ICE engine to come up with the conclusion that more ICE autos in a world that does and needs to switch to E-Mobility and a business environment where new E-Auto brands increasingly threaten your business model would be able to solve your issues?
The problem is not that Porsche builds an inferior EV. A Taycan is a comprehensively better vehicle in every way than even the Chinese EVs that attempt to imitate it; for Exhibit A, I draw your attention to the Xiaomi SU7, the performance versions of which got notorious for running into walls because their under-cooled brakes fail on the track. BYD and Nio are not even in the same conversation as Porsche as far as performance, engineering, and quality, and Xiaomi is the punchline.

The problem with Porsche's EV business in China is not that it makes a bad EV. It's that Chinese consumers do not (by and large, of course there's exceptions) really give a shit about what Porsche brings to the table, e.g. racing heritage, uncompromising dynamics, driver feedback, track performance, understated styling. Those are things that American and European car enthusiasts care about, because Porsches have been a luxury purchase in those areas for decades, there is a deep culture of driving and motorsports enthusiasm, and many owners participate in track days, Porsche Club of America events, group drives, that kind of thing. In China, Porsches do not have that kind of emotional pull. They're just another Western luxury brand, and broadly speaking, the enthusiast culture is almost nonexistent. Motorsports viewership is essentially nil in China outside of F1 and even that's a new thing, so Porsche's motorsports glories have very little traction, performance cars were rare as hen's teeth until relatively recently, and nobody's dad or cool uncle drove a 911 in '60s, '70s, even 2000s China - so why would the typical Chinese buyers give a shit about what makes Porsche special to me? In that market, buyers treat cars more like tech devices and fashion.

It's not surprising to me that Chinese buyers are looking for different attributes than what a storied German sports car brand brings to their market, but that doesn't mean a BYD with a dash that's 80% screen is better, just better suited to that market.