The holiday season is fast approaching, and with it, all manner of uncomfortable conversations with relatives who think they know a lot about a lot but are in fact just walking examples of Dunning-Kruger in action. Not going home is always an option—there’s no reason you should spend your free time with people you can’t stand, after all. But if you are headed home and are not looking forward to having to converse with your uncle or parent over heaped plates of turkey and potatoes, we put together some talking points to debunk their more nonsensical claims about electric vehicles.
Charging an EV takes too long
The No. 1 complaint from people with no experience with driving or living with an electric car, cited as a reason for why they will never get an EV, is that it takes too long to recharge them. On the one hand, this attitude is understandable. For more than a century, humans have become accustomed to vehicles that can be refueled in minutes, using very energy-dense liquids that can be pumped into a fuel tank at a rate of up to 10 gallons per minute.
By contrast, batteries are not at all fast to recharge, particularly if you plug into an AC charger. Even the fastest fast-charging EVs connected to a fast DC fast charger will still need between 18–20 minutes to go from 10 to 80 percent state of charge, and that, apparently, is more time than some curmudgeons are prepared to wait as they drive from coast to coast as fast as they possibly can.
The thing is, an EV is a paradigm shift compared to a gasoline-powered car. Yes, refueling for that gas car is quick, but it’s also inconvenient, particularly if you live somewhere where all the gas stations keep closing down.
Instead of weekly trips to the gas station—or perhaps more often in some cases—EV owners plug their cars in each night and wake up each morning with a full battery.

Hank Green did a video on this exact subject recently: View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcnuaM-xdHw
And here's the article he references: https://www.greencarcongress.com/2022/05/20220513-ea.html
In short, all of the "EVs are worse because of tire dust" comments originate from one study by Emissions Analytics. In it, they concluded that the particulate mass emissions (so not including gasses) of tires were 1850 times worse than tailpipe emissions. Pretty bad, but this applies in general to all cars.
Next, they did some tests in various situations, comparing new vs old tires, additional weight and aggressive driving:
Shocker! 500 kg of additional vehicle mass produces a lot more emissions! And that entire bar is additional wear. And EVs are heavier that the same model ICE, so EVs are worse than ICE cars. QED.
Yeah, hold up. See that big bar on the right? That's from aggressive driving. That bar is a lot bigger than the +500kg bar. "Sure, " you say, "but that bar still seems like pretty significant portion of that." No. Look again at the numbers. This is a logarithmic scale. Aggressive driving is three orders of magnitude worse than extra weight. In fact, here's the table with actual numbers:
Further, this test was done on an ICE car. If you're worried about tire emissions, buy a light hatch instead of giant truck or SUV. And far more importantly, drive carefully!
Further further, this test was done by just adding a bunch of weight to an ICE car. It wasn't tested with an actual EV which uses regenerative breaking, different behavior when driving away, and possibly specialized tires.
Further further further, the numbers are relative to tailpipe emissions (which have to be added for the ICE but don't exist for the EV) and only the particulate mass. Gaseous emissions are completely ignored.
Edit: More fun with figures: The table and chart mixes airborne particulates and total tire wear. Of the figures, only one ("Airborne tire particles - normal driving, new tires") deals with the former, all the others are total tire wear. Taking the two numbers for "New tire wear, normal driving" we can see that about 8.03 / 73.00 = 10.99% of tire wear ends up airborne (the remainder probably ends up deposited on the road surface.) The "+500kg" figure adds 7.67 mg/km extra total wear, or an increase of 10.5%, with I assume the same relative increase in airborne particles.
In other words, even assuming we can completely ignore tailpipe emissions entirely, assuming an average EV is about 500kg heavier than an ICE car, and assuming an EV wears tires exactly the same as an ICE car with a 500kg weight added, this is only an increase of 10% in particulate emissions! Not "400x" or whatever!
Asheville, NC was devastated by Hurricane Helene. The local Tesla Supercharger (and I think EA at Sam's Club as well, but I'm not sure?) was working well, while all the gas stations were out of gas.
My friend with his small fleet of Teslas was delivering water and supplies all over the city for weeks while the ICErs were stranded.