Skip to content
a breath of fresh air

New EPA rules would cut car emissions 56% by 2032

New rules would affect light- and medium-duty vehicles.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 199
Car exhaust on a cold morning
Credit: Getty Images
Credit: Getty Images
Story text

On Wednesday, after a week of rumors and anticipation, the US Environmental Protection Agency published proposed new vehicle emissions regulations. If adopted, the new rules would go into effect for model years 2027–2032 and would be the strictest fuel economy regulations yet seen in the United States, cutting fleet carbon emissions for light-duty vehicles by 56 percent from 2026 levels.

The new regulations would also bring in tougher standards for other airborne pollutants emitted by the internal combustion engines in those light-duty vehicles. Additionally, the EPA proposes tougher new rules on medium-duty (class 2b and class 3) vehicles—mostly large pickup trucks and vans with a gross vehicle weight rating of 8,501–14,000 lbs. The EPA is also looking to modify some credit programs and wants new durability and warranty standards for the battery packs in battery electric vehicles.

The EPA thinks that two-thirds of new car sales will be electric within the next decade if the rules are adopted, as they require automakers to sell many more BEVs.

152 g CO2/mile

The EPA regulations continue to make distinctions between passenger cars and trucks (which includes vans and SUVs) when it comes to light-duty vehicles. It does note that most light-duty vehicles only carry passengers and do not tow or haul, and the agency will continue to give light trucks more lenient emissions regulations, which factor in offsets for all-wheel drive and utility that increases with a vehicle’s footprint.

The proposed rules do also acknowledge that OEMs have taken advantage of similar leniency in the past to reclassify light-duty vehicles as light trucks in order to pollute more. One way the EPA hopes to prevent that is by increasing the minimum allowed footprint for a car from 41 square feet to 45 square feet by model year 2032 and by reducing the maximum footprint of trucks to 70 square feet (from 73 square feet) by model year 2030.

As you might expect, the CO2 targets are a bit tougher for more efficient cars to hit than trucks, as shown in the following table:

Model Year Cars CO2 g/mile Trucks CO2 g/mile Fleet CO2 g/mile
2026 adjusted 152 207 186
2027 134 163 152
2028 116 142 131
2029 99 120 111
2030 91 110 102
2031 82 100 93
2032 onward 73 89 82

For the fleet averages, the EPA is assuming a mix of 40 percent cars to 60 percent trucks for model years 2026–2029 and 41 percent cars to 59 percent trucks from model year 2030 onward.

The proposed targets for medium-duty vehicles allow these vehicles to emit much more carbon dioxide from their tailpipes, and less aerodynamic pickup trucks are allowed to pollute more than vans, as you can see from the following table:

Model Year Vans CO2 g/mile Pickups CO2 g/mile Combined CO2 g/mile
2027 393 462 438
2028 379 452 427
2029 345 413 389
2030 309 374 352
2031 276 331 312
2032 onward 243 292 275

For medium-duty vehicles, the EPA is proposing eliminating the multiplier credits it previously gave to electrified medium-duty vehicles as a result of the rapid increase in electrification of these vehicles in the past few years.

There are other pollutants, too

The EPA doesn’t just care about carbon emissions; it also wants to decrease the amounts of “non-methane organic gases and nitrogen oxides,” or NMOG+NOx, as well as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and formaldehyde. Rather than just adopting these new standards as is, the agency proposes eight phase-in scenarios it will let automakers pick from.

That makes it a little complicated to break down how much or how little each model year is supposed to pollute, but for NMOG+NOx, the EPA is targeting 12 mg/mile for light-duty vehicles and 60 mg/mile for medium-duty vehicles by model year 2032. Particulate matter would be capped at 0.5 mg/mile.

There are different carbon monoxide caps based on ambient temperatures. At 25˚C, light-duty vehicles will be allowed to emit 1.7 g/mile, but 10 g/mile at -7˚C. Formaldehyde emissions will be capped at 4 mg/mile. For medium-duty vehicles, the caps for carbon monoxide are 3.2 g/mile at 25˚C and 10 g/mile at -7˚C, and 6 g/mile for formaldehyde.

That battery better last

Obviously, none of the above emissions rules will have much effect on a battery EV since they emit no tailpipe emissions; the EPA says it will continue to regulate emissions from electricity generation separately, and it’s therefore not appropriate to factor that into rating EV efficiency.

That’s not to say the proposed rules don’t affect EVs—the new regulations include battery durability and warranty requirements for both light- and medium-duty battery EVs and plug-in hybrid EVs. This would require automakers to include a battery state-of-health monitor in new EVs that would easily tell the vehicle’s owner how much useable battery energy the pack can store as a percentage of the original usable battery energy.

Additionally, there will be new minimum performance requirements for batteries in light-duty vehicles. This would require that a battery pack has at least 80 percent of its usable energy at five years and no less than 70 percent at eight years, or 100,000 miles.

That’s separate from a battery and electric powertrain warranty requirement that the EPA wants to see adopted across all light-duty EVs. The EPA is proposing a warranty period of eight years or 80,000 miles (most automakers already warranty their EV batteries for eight years or 100,000 miles).

Most people are happy

Environmental advocacy organizations seem mostly happy with the proposed standards.

“We applaud the administration’s leadership in accelerating transportation decarbonization through the EPA’s new vehicle emission standards,” said Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emissions Transportation Association. “This goal is eminently achievable and represents a leap forward not only for the auto industry but for the millions of workers across the EV supply chain producing critical minerals, manufacturing and recycling batteries, constructing a nationwide charging network, and building out the grid to support it.”

“These EPA standards are a key piece of the puzzle to curb our country’s single largest source of carbon pollution and provide cleaner air and a safer climate for all,” said Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Done right, these will put the US on the road to end pollution from vehicle tailpipes—while also slashing our dependence on oil, creating good domestic jobs, and saving consumers money on fuel.”

However, the NRDC pointed out that the truck pollution rules remain inadequate.

The auto industry was more cautious. “A lot has to go right for this massive—and unprecedented—change in our automotive market and industrial base to succeed. Factors outside the vehicle, like charging infrastructure, supply chains, grid resiliency, the availability of low-carbon fuels and critical minerals will determine whether EPA standards at these levels are achievable,” said John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation.

According to Reuters, the Biden administration is trying its hardest to get the new emissions regulations finalized by 2024 to make it harder for the rules to be rolled back by any incoming administration with less scientific views on air pollution and climate change.

Listing image: Getty Images

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
199 Comments