On Wednesday, after a week of rumors and anticipation, the US Environmental Protection Agency published proposed new vehicle emissions regulations. If adopted, the new rules would go into effect for model years 2027–2032 and would be the strictest fuel economy regulations yet seen in the United States, cutting fleet carbon emissions for light-duty vehicles by 56 percent from 2026 levels.
The new regulations would also bring in tougher standards for other airborne pollutants emitted by the internal combustion engines in those light-duty vehicles. Additionally, the EPA proposes tougher new rules on medium-duty (class 2b and class 3) vehicles—mostly large pickup trucks and vans with a gross vehicle weight rating of 8,501–14,000 lbs. The EPA is also looking to modify some credit programs and wants new durability and warranty standards for the battery packs in battery electric vehicles.
The EPA thinks that two-thirds of new car sales will be electric within the next decade if the rules are adopted, as they require automakers to sell many more BEVs.
152 g CO2/mile
The EPA regulations continue to make distinctions between passenger cars and trucks (which includes vans and SUVs) when it comes to light-duty vehicles. It does note that most light-duty vehicles only carry passengers and do not tow or haul, and the agency will continue to give light trucks more lenient emissions regulations, which factor in offsets for all-wheel drive and utility that increases with a vehicle’s footprint.
The proposed rules do also acknowledge that OEMs have taken advantage of similar leniency in the past to reclassify light-duty vehicles as light trucks in order to pollute more. One way the EPA hopes to prevent that is by increasing the minimum allowed footprint for a car from 41 square feet to 45 square feet by model year 2032 and by reducing the maximum footprint of trucks to 70 square feet (from 73 square feet) by model year 2030.
As you might expect, the CO2 targets are a bit tougher for more efficient cars to hit than trucks, as shown in the following table:

Loading comments...