Skip to content
82 kWh/gallon becomes 23 kWh/gallon

Automakers may have to sell 4x more EVs under new proposed CAFE rules

The changes will affect car companies but not car buyers.

Jonathan M. Gitlin | 493
A car made of leaves
Credit: Getty Images
Credit: Getty Images
Story text

Today, the US Department of Energy published a notice of proposed rulemaking that would change the way the government calculates the energy efficiency of electric vehicles. If adopted, the changes will substantially downgrade the fuel-efficiency ratings given to EVs and be used to determine corporate average fuel economy (better known as CAFE). That might have serious implications for automakers, but don’t worry—the consumer-facing MPGe and kWh/100 miles numbers you see on Monroney window stickers and at the US Environmental Protection Agency’s fueleconomy.gov site won’t change.

They call it CAFE, but you can’t drink it

Congress enacted CAFE in 1975 in the wake of the country’s first serious energy crisis. It gives an average fuel efficiency number that each automaker must achieve to not be sanctioned by the government, and the standards and penalties are enforced by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

But the fuel efficiency numbers that NHTSA calculates are much higher than the actual efficiency you or I might experience, or the numbers posted by the EPA for consumers to make buying decisions.

The advent of electric cars complicated the process even more. Although the Secretary of Transportation is responsible for determining CAFE standards through NHTSA, since 1979, the Secretary of Energy and the Department of Energy have been responsible for calculating “the equivalent petroleum-based fuel economy” of those EVs.

Specifically, the DOE has to review the data each year and decide if revisions are necessary based on several factors: the approximate electrical efficiency of the vehicle, taking into account the kind of vehicle and its intended use; the national average electrical generation and transmission efficiencies; the US need to conserve energy; and the specific patterns of EV use versus gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicles.

To begin with, the DOE started a seven-year evaluation program to determine the “petroleum-equivalency factor” and proposed a rule for a permanent PEF in 1994. Several years of discussion with stakeholders followed before a new rule was proposed in 1999 and adopted in 2000. And it’s one that allows automakers to offset a lot of thirsty gas guzzlers for each EV they sell:

The calculation procedure converts the measured electrical energy consumption of an electric vehicle into a raw gasoline-equivalent fuel economy value and then divides this value by 0.15 to arrive at a final petroleum-equivalent fuel economy value which may then be included in the calculation of the manufacturer’s corporate average fuel economy.

That generosity did not go unnoticed. In 2021, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club petitioned the DOE to update its calculations, and the DOE agreed.

The actual testing of cars won’t change

The DOE won’t change the way it calculates an EV’s efficiency (in Wh/mile), which is determined by the EPA’s Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (HFEDS) and Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) test cycles.

However, it does agree with the NRDC and Sierra Club that the data for electricity generation and transmission efficiencies must be updated from the values arrived at in 2000 and should incorporate projections of where the energy in our electrical grid comes from.

With regard to energy conservation, the DOE says it “recognizes the need of the nation to conserve all forms of energy, and more specifically, finite resources such as fossil fuels, including petroleum consumed by ICE vehicles.”

On the other hand, it also notes that “current and future sources of electricity generation are and will be in relative abundance,” particularly since the passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act. But by not changing the PEF, the DOE thinks the current CAFE regulations could actually lead to increased gasoline consumption.

A concrete example may be useful at this point to illustrate just how generous the current CAFE regulations are for automakers who build EVs. The DOE offers the example of the Kia Niro EV, which for CAFE purposes is calculated at 394.3 MPGe. If we were to look at the consumer-facing data on fueleconomy.gov, we’d see that the EPA rates it at a combined 113 MPGe.

To put it another way, consumer ratings use the figure of 33.7 kWh/gallon of gasoline to determine MPGe; CAFE’s PEF results in a figure of 82 kWh/gallon.

This creates perverse incentives, argues the DOE, in that giving too much credit to EVs means gasoline-powered vehicles can be less efficient as a result and that an automaker can satisfy the CAFE standards by selling a small number of EVs.

A new PEF

In coming up with a new PEF, the DOE wanted to consider the full energy cycle from the point of primary energy production all the way to the wheels. It says it will treat nuclear and renewables as 100 percent efficient and will calculate the grid mix projected for model-year 2027 to determine the new PEF, which will be fixed through model-year 2031. (Grid mix has been determined by the 2021 Electrification 95 by 2050 Standard Scenario projection model from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.)

Consequently, the new PEF returns a number that is lower than the amount of energy stored in a gallon of gasoline. Should the proposed rule be adopted, from 2027 to 2031, the new PEF would be just 23.16 kWh/gallon.

That means automakers would have to sell nearly four times as many EVs as they currently sell to receive the same reduction in their CAFE number.

“This Department of Energy proposal is welcome news,” said Joshua Berman, senior attorney with the Sierra Club. “This updated calculation will keep automakers accountable to improving the fuel economy of their fleets while also encouraging them to build electric vehicles at the rate needed to meet the urgency of the dual climate and air pollution crises fueled by gas cars.”

“Fuel economy standards must improve the efficiency of the millions of gasoline-powered vehicles still to be sold even as we transition to electric vehicles. This rule is about making sure that happens,” said Luke Tonachel, senior director for clean vehicles and buildings at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Tomorrow, the EPA is widely expected to issue new vehicle emissions rules to boost EV adoption and help the US meet President Joe Biden’s goal of 50 percent of all new cars being plug-in vehicles by 2030.

Listing image: Getty Images

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin
Jonathan M. Gitlin Automotive Editor
Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica's automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.
493 Comments
Staff Picks
H
Except as some of us keep pointing out, from next year dealers will be allowed to pass the full credit on to consumers at the point of sale.
It's worth pointing out that the commercial vehicle credit applies to leases and has none of the restrictions the section 30D credit has such as income/msrp/origin restrictions. All leasing banks are currently taking advantage of it and many are passing it along to consumers as a capital cost reduction. Vinfast is utilizing it and a great example of the kind of company the IRA was designed to stop from getting credits.

Just lease and buy out the lease in the first month to get all of the benefits with none of the income/origin/msrp restrictions.