Skip to content
Up-VOLTed

The SWFT VOLT: A minimalist e-bike with a price to match

Keeping prices low leads to a fundamentally different riding experience.

John Timmer | 105
Image of a bicycle.
Credit: SWFT
Credit: SWFT
Story text

So far, the two e-bikes I’ve looked at on Ars have been targeting the high end: expensive components and a carefully thought-through riding experience. I looked at them because I thought their creators were trying to do interesting things with the e-bike format, especially compared to the commoditized bikes being offered on the low end.

But I realized that this was only giving me a partial perspective on the e-bike landscape; all I could really compare them with was high-end traditional bikes. So, I was intrigued when a company called SWFT got in touch about two models it was introducing, both at extremely competitive prices. I chose one in a hybrid format that should make it a great gravel bike, since there are a growing number of long-distance trails that require time on gravel.

The gravel bike thing didn’t work out, but I did get a very different e-bike experience, which means it at least ticks the “interesting” box.

Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.

A commodity

SWFT will sell you its bikes directly, but it has also partnered with Best Buy, which is offering it at a significant discount: $750 when we last checked prices. A handful of bikes sell for cheaper than that, but only a handful. To offer something at that sort of price, manufacturers have to leave no corner uncut. And that approach shows in nearly every aspect of the VOLT.

Many e-bike makers offer easy-to-remove batteries to simplify charging—you can just pop them out of the bike and carry them to wherever you keep the charger. Not an option for the VOLT, which has to be stored near an outlet to charge via a cable that connects directly to a socket on the frame. When not charging, that socket is covered by a rubber flap that, on my bike, tended to pop open while riding—it’s not clear if that would pose a problem in the rain.

Component makers (the companies that build the brakes and gears) tend to have groups of matched components of varying quality. (To give an example, Shimano offers Claris, Sora, Tiagra, 105, Ultegra, and Dura Ace in ascending order of quality and price.) Typically, you can just look at the label on the components of a bike and figure out roughly where you are in the hierarchy. The SWFT components have no label at all. I couldn’t even figure out who manufactured them.

Image of a box with logos.
Some assembly required: the VOLT showed up mostly assembled but without the front wheel or handlebar attached.
Some assembly required: the VOLT showed up mostly assembled but without the front wheel or handlebar attached.

The no-name hardware wasn’t always a problem. The brakes were easy to set up and worked flawlessly during all the rides I took, despite the bike’s rather impressive weight. By contrast, the assembly holding the seat to the post was something I hadn’t seen on a bike since I was in high school. It was difficult to adjust and challenging to tighten down securely enough that it didn’t shift when going over rough pavement.

The VOLT has a fairly typical hybrid layout. The steel frame is more robust than a typical road bike, but without the all-terrain niceties of a mountain bike. (It’s also one-size-fits-all—or, in the case of someone over six feet tall, doesn’t quite fit all.) The wheels and tires were partway in between these two extremes as well, and the handlebars are straight, with grips and brakes at the end. The ride was about what you’d expect: deep ruts in the pavement could still give you a jolt, but the VOLT soaked up most rough roads without jarring its rider.

But of course, the main point of the VOLT is the “e” side of the e-bike equation.

Not electrifying

The component minimalism extended to the electrical system. Higher-end e-bikes often offer things like front and rear lights, directional signals on the handlebars, and USB ports for charging your devices while on the move. On the VOLT, the battery was wired into a grand total of four items: a headlight, the motor, a throttle of sorts, and the control panel.

The light was fine. The control panel was minimalist, displaying your speed and total miles traveled. All the options it offered were controlled by three buttons, one of which turned the unit on and off. The two others cycled the motor through three levels of assist and off, with one doubling as a headlight on/off switch when held down. Those also worked fine.

That leaves the e-bike experience of the VOLT almost entirely dependent on the motor and its interactions with your normal biking activities. And this is where things were very different from the earlier bikes I tried. Those had multiple gears, and the motor’s controls responded to how quickly you were pedaling. That, combined with multiple levels of assistance, gives riders a tremendous number of options to tailor their ride experience to their wants. These ranged from pedaling quickly with low torque as the motor did most of the work, to a gentle electrical assist that simply made pedaling feel more effective.

The VOLT has no gears, and its assist won’t push you much faster than 32 km/hour (20 mph)—less if you’re going up a steep hill. If you’re pedaling, you get an assist, seemingly regardless of how fast you’re pushing the pedals. You can also get the motor going without moving the pedals by twisting and holding a throttle on the right handlebar.

At the lowest level of assist, you were clearly left doing most of the work. At higher levels, the motor took on more of the effort. Except for fairly steep hills, I had a hard time distinguishing between the top two levels of assist; both were generally enough to help me reach a speed where the motor topped out.

There’s no real tailoring of your ride here. You just pick how hard you want to work, and the motor does the rest, limited by the steepness of the terrain. On a steep downhill, you’ll clear its maximum speed, and it’ll cut out entirely; on a steep uphill, it’ll max out the power it can deliver before you hit its speed limitation.

Choose your ride

My original plan had been to take this to a gravel trail to see how I liked riding on a surface that my regular ride (a road bike) isn’t made for. The hope was that I’d like the experience enough to build up my conditioning to where an NYC to Canada ride was an option.

Unfortunately, the round trip to the trail I had in mind was close to the edge of the VOLT’s promised 32 mile range. Unless I was willing to pedal part of the trip with the assist shut off, I’d barely get any time on the gravel. And the unassisted pedaling experience made me unwilling to do that. Imagine a fixed gear ratio that’s terrible for speed on a bike that was a couple of inches too short for my legs and weighed about four times what my road bike did.

Fortunately, the exploratory rides I took suggested a lot of alternate uses where the VOLT would work just fine. There’s a coffee shop that would normally require a couple of uphill stretches that would be enough to leave me drenched in sweat if I biked there in warm weather. With the VOLT, I rolled up feeling comfortable. The same was true for a number of errands that I ran using the bike. None of them strained the range of the battery or forced me into a situation where the poor fit of the frame and my body came into play. Yet all of them left me feeling like my legs had gotten a bit of exercise, even though the motor flattened out the hills for me.

And really, that’s more of what I would want an e-bike for. I do long rides specifically because I want the exercise, and the motor would just get in the way of that. For short trips, I’m mostly looking for something that’s faster than walking and won’t leave me a sweaty mess. And the VOLT delivered that at a price that makes owning it as a second bike a realistic option for many people. So, while it’s not a great bike, I could see it being a useful ride.

Listing image: SWFT

Photo of John Timmer
John Timmer Senior Science Editor
John is Ars Technica's science editor. He has a Bachelor of Arts in Biochemistry from Columbia University, and a Ph.D. in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California, Berkeley. When physically separated from his keyboard, he tends to seek out a bicycle, or a scenic location for communing with his hiking boots.
105 Comments