One of the biggest bummers about the modern Internet has been the decline of Google Search. Once an essential part of using the web, it’s now a shadow of its former self, full of SEO-fueled junk and AI-generated spam.
On Thursday, OpenAI announced a new feature of ChatGPT that could potentially replace Google Search for some people: an upgraded web search capability for its AI assistant that provides answers with source attribution during conversations. The feature, officially called “ChatGPT with Search,” makes web search automatic based on user questions, with an option to manually trigger searches through a new web search icon.
OpenAI hopes the new capability will streamline web searching by eliminating the need for multiple searches and link exploration that traditional search engines sometimes require. Users can ask follow-up questions, with ChatGPT considering the context of the entire conversation to provide answers.
Each search result in ChatGPT comes with a citation link, and users can click a “Sources” button beneath responses to view referenced materials in a sidebar that pops up beside the chat history.
The new search system runs on a fine-tuned version of GPT-4o, which OpenAI says it post-trained using synthetic data output from its o1-preview model. ChatGPT could previously search the web, but it often provided old and irrelevant results. This new push into search follows OpenAI’s earlier SearchGPT prototype, launched as a limited test in July, which explored a new way for ChatGPT to bring in fresher content.
In a demo Q&A for Ars Technica hosted by OpenAI, the company’s representatives would not specify exactly if the search info came from Microsoft’s Bing search engine or its own crawled search index, saying it pulls from a “blend” of sources, including partner media organizations.
ChatGPT with Search also helps OpenAI take advantage of its new publishing partnerships and reframe those media relationships into something beyond merely scraping web data to train its AI models, which caused legal trouble in the past.

Loading comments...