Yeah, one would think that both his employment contract, and the buyout of his company included language about their payment on both being contingent on them being able to actually use both his experience and IP.Now the big question: what provisions did Uber include in the acquisition agreement to claw back stock options in this sort of situation?
I'd certainly hope that they had something in there to ensure that the options didn't vest if Levandowski was fired with cause during the first few years of employment.
If not, then Uber's CEO deserves to be fired too.
Yeah, one would think that both his employment contract, and the buyout of his company included language about their payment on both being contingent on them being able to actually use both his experience and IP.Now the big question: what provisions did Uber include in the acquisition agreement to claw back stock options in this sort of situation?
I'd certainly hope that they had something in there to ensure that the options didn't vest if Levandowski was fired with cause during the first few years of employment.
If not, then Uber's CEO deserves to be fired too.
Of course, that's currently a double-edged sword for them. Sue Levandowski now and they basically admit that the stuff they purchased from him is Waymo property. So they'll most likely need to wait until the end of this litigation before they can possibly try to go after those hundreds of millions they paid for his company.
Yeah, one would think that both his employment contract, and the buyout of his company included language about their payment on both being contingent on them being able to actually use both his experience and IP.Now the big question: what provisions did Uber include in the acquisition agreement to claw back stock options in this sort of situation?
I'd certainly hope that they had something in there to ensure that the options didn't vest if Levandowski was fired with cause during the first few years of employment.
If not, then Uber's CEO deserves to be fired too.
Of course, that's currently a double-edged sword for them. Sue Levandowski now and they basically admit that the stuff they purchased from him is Waymo property. So they'll most likely need to wait until the end of this litigation before they can possibly try to go after those hundreds of millions they paid for his company.
If uber did everything on its own and isn't hiding anything then why haven't they let an independent team requested by waymo look at their systems?
Show of votes:The company says Google's files didn't make their way to Uber.
If uber did everything on its own and isn't hiding anything then why haven't they let an independent team requested by waymo look at their systems?
Can't speak for Uber, but at the company I work for, even a standard software license audit will get certain folks in a tizzy. We don't like anybody looking at any of our stuff for any reason. A third party, contracted by our partners, even less so - even when we confident we are going to come up clean.
A third party during the course of litigation with a competitor, wherein there is a good chance we could be dinged? I suspect that Levandowski has a better chance of getting rehired by Alphabet.
This was the obvious next move.
The interesting question is the relationship. Was this a termination for failing to cooperate with the court-imposed discovery, or telling him to "Lay low for a bit, and don't reveal anything. You don't have to comply with discovery if you are no longer an employee. If it all works out, you get to keep the money."
He may not have $680M. The engineers Otto lured from Google were probably motivated by their own stock shares.Yeah that will teach him not to steal. I feel bad for the guys having to live off the 680 million dollars he made from the theft without a day job for financial security.
Now if there was jail time and restitution on the horizon maybe he would be a little worried.
Yeah that will teach him not to steal. I feel bad for the guys having to live off the 680 million dollars he made from the theft without a day job for financial security.
Now if there was jail time and restitution on the horizon maybe he would be a little worried.
The ride-sharing company points out that it has interviewed dozens of employees and sifted through more than 12 terabytes of data looking for Google's files.
Sometimes i wonder how Uber, as a company, let these kinds of affair linger for so long. Any company that works with R&D has no business allowing an employee involved in a data theft scandal linger in their workforce, especially in a management position. Uber should have suspended Lewandowsky from his position the very day the scandal broke out, and terminated him on the first hint that he refused to cooperate.
At this point it's obvious Uber was at the very least sloppy for not performing due diligence on his acquisition of Otto, and most likely someone at Uber enabled Lewandowsky. This wouldn't be as bad if Uber had the attitude to swiftly fire all employees involved in these shady deals, but instead they take a reticent position to delay the resolution of this issue.
It's almost like Uber WANTS to look like Evil Inc., which is funny since their long history of crookedness suggest that's exactly what they are. But they certainly could use a little less bad press.
Seriously, why is there no jail time?
Seriously, why is there no jail time?
Seriously, why is there no jail time?
So, in other words, he did it.
So they'll most likely need to wait until the end of this litigation before they can possibly try to go after those hundreds of millions they paid for his company.
Unless Uber is totally incompetent, the $680M is mostly options on Uber shares dependent on future performance, which has been underwhelming so far. It would be REALLY interesting to know the details.
Because he hasn't been charged with anything yet. Emphasis on the "yet".Seriously, why is there no jail time?
Otto was acquired for $680MM in Uber stock. Not "stock options", stock.Unless Uber is totally incompetent, the $680M is mostly options on Uber shares dependent on future performance, which has been underwhelming so far. It would be REALLY interesting to know the details.
Why do people keep saying stock options? It would be highly unusual for a company to acquire another company by paying with stock options.
Now seperate from the acquisition Levandowski like most Uber employees probably had employee stock option grants and those are shit canned but I find it unlikely that Uber a publicly traded company was able to acquire another company with options. Deals are usually cash and equity or possibly equity alone.
I say this as someone who has worked for more than one startup including two that were eventually acquired.