The ill-fated trading ship has spent 2,400 years at the bottom of the Black Sea.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
In something that well preserved there is surely going to be a trove of information. I sincerely hope there is a recovery effort, and that they are able to preserve the wreck in-tact as much as possible. So much to study.
There's something to be said for leaving it down there. I have visions of it being brought up, put in a museum, then destroyed in a war or fire. At that depth it'll be preserved another 2000 years.
Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
In something that well preserved there is surely going to be a trove of information. I sincerely hope there is a recovery effort, and that they are able to preserve the wreck in-tact as much as possible. So much to study.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
Ah, so you believe some magical technology from the future and a magical change in human nature will occur to make recovery later suddenly much better than recovery now?Ah, so you believe that our gathering of information now is more important than future peoples to have the ability to even see these artifacts. Sounds self centered. There are countless examples of archaeological sites that have been ruined by archaeologists. Maybe the profession could take a page from medicine, first , do no harm.Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
In something that well preserved there is surely going to be a trove of information. I sincerely hope there is a recovery effort, and that they are able to preserve the wreck in-tact as much as possible. So much to study.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Well no one's going to see it where it is now, so that seems like a reason for recovery, not against it.Ah, so you believe that our gathering of information now is more important than future peoples to have the ability to even see these artifacts. Sounds self centered. There are countless examples of archaeological sites that have been ruined by archaeologists. Maybe the profession could take a page from medicine, first , do no harm.Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
In something that well preserved there is surely going to be a trove of information. I sincerely hope there is a recovery effort, and that they are able to preserve the wreck in-tact as much as possible. So much to study.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
On the vague chance you aren't already, check out Clickspring's ongoing reproduction of the Antikythera mechanism. Aside from the artisanship of the work, he explains a lot of the why and wherefore of the design as he goes.Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
Maybe this boat has some claim to be more intact than older wrecked ships. But the 14th century BCE Urlubrunun shipwreck was well enough preserved for both the construction of the ship and its cargo to be understood.
Rather than sorry, Beth would be proud.The ship on this vase, painted around 480 BCE, bears a jarring (sorry) resemblance to a shipwreck from the same period
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Beth has to teach Kiona to stop pulling her punches.Rather than sorry, Beth would be proud.The ship on this vase, painted around 480 BCE, bears a jarring (sorry) resemblance to a shipwreck from the same period
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Leave it where it is till the technology exists where it can be preserved effectively.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Leave it where it is till the technology exists where it can be preserved effectively.
Ah, so you believe some magical technology from the future and a magical change in human nature will occur to make recovery later suddenly much better than recovery now?Ah, so you believe that our gathering of information now is more important than future peoples to have the ability to even see these artifacts. Sounds self centered. There are countless examples of archaeological sites that have been ruined by archaeologists. Maybe the profession could take a page from medicine, first , do no harm.Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
In something that well preserved there is surely going to be a trove of information. I sincerely hope there is a recovery effort, and that they are able to preserve the wreck in-tact as much as possible. So much to study.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
The Black Sea is probably a well filled archaeological treasure trove waiting to be tapped. I hope the scientist get most of it first, not the black market robbers.
Would be interesting to see if it will be possible to approve or disapprove the "Deluge theory", about the a possible chain of events leading to a major flooding, or not, after the last Ice Age.
It might work for this particular wreck, assuming no one else gets to it in secret; but it's sadly not a universal approach. Many Laserdiscs are already rotting, and it's only going to get worse with time. That's why the team working on the Domesday Duplicator has been taking the approach of backing up everything they can now and worrying about how to decode it later; if they leave Laserdiscs where they are until the technology to capture them has been perfected, then the LDs will be far too degraded to recover.Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Leave it where it is till the technology exists where it can be preserved effectively.
Ancient Greek. I think there's decent chances of epic and legendary.7,000 foot deep shipwreck? Oh man you just -know- there's a epic or legendary weapon in a chest somewhere....
It wouldn't be the first time. Recall Clarke's Third Law about sufficiently advanced technology being indistinguishable from magic, and there's your "magical technology from the future". And human nature does change.
Compare what Cope, Marsh, and others did during the (in)famous Bone Wars era of paleontology, where all they seemed to care about was the (big) bones and establishing precedence when naming a new species. A lot of potentially valuable data was lost, because the techniques for examining the surrounding matrix with e.g. ultraviolet, x-ray fluorescence, and other techniques for remnants of soft tissue didn't exist then. As it is, plenty of those bone specimens are still wrapped in their plaster jackets gathering dust in some museum storeroom.
Expanding on that: I'm glad Cope, Marsh, etc. did recover a number of different dinosaur species -- that pushed the field of paleontology forward -- but they could have still done that while restraining their enthusiasm a bit. At times they were a bit reckless.
Please please please have some amazingly well-preserved ancient surprise like the Antikythera mechanism...
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Leave it where it is till the technology exists where it can be preserved effectively.
We probably can preserve this effectively. The work on Mary Rose and Vasa has shown how to preserve wood (and in the case of Vasa includes some lessons in what not to do), while the preservation of the turret of the Monitor has provided experience with metal and multi-material artifacts. If the ship was at a depth where it could be dived on, I would argue against raising it, but there's no way to study its internals in its current location.
Leave it where it is. If we bring it up it will be lost/destroyed within a century.
If we bring artifacts up at least we can document/examine them and learn more about the era. This isn't like the environment, where the purpose of preservation is to ensure that future generations have access to the same natural resources that we do.
Leaving artifacts on the seafloor for the sole reason of preservation doesn't help anyone.
Leave it where it is till the technology exists where it can be preserved effectively.
"It’s an interesting validation of a long-standing habit among archaeologists who study ancient ships: looking to ancient art for clues about how the ships were designed and built."
It's always an exciting moment (with sighs of relief) for scientists when evidence from one source is corroborated by another. Kudos to them for the discovery. Are there any theories as to what caused the ship to sink?
Rather than sorry, Beth would be proud.The ship on this vase, painted around 480 BCE, bears a jarring (sorry) resemblance to a shipwreck from the same period