This man clearly continues to have much difficulty understanding & following the law...Lee was a triple felon
That says literally everything one needs to know about the company and its culture.“Sounds like a bunch of liberals lol.”
I’m surprised nobody like this idiot have tried to sue the lock picking lawyer.
Defense against lockpicks is like high grade encryption: useful in many respects but still vulnerable to the proverbial "$5 wrench" attack.I just can't imagine the sort of guy with some domestic violence priors and willingness to use 'liberal' as an insult would be other than even-tempered and intellectually honest. Crazy stuff.
At least the judge sounded downright professionally unimpressed, which is nice.
The whole thing is especially ridiculous in the context of the fact that modern battery tech makes the overwhelming majority of locks you'd ever actually want to carry roughly equals against the zero-skill "angle grinder and act like you are supposed to be doing that" technique.
Non-destructive and covert have their uses; but often just as a ruleset that preserves some difference between the skill floor and the skill ceiling.
as the name implies, he IS a lawyer. You do you, but it would be really really stupid.I’m surprised nobody like this idiot have tried to sue the lock picking lawyer.
I just can't imagine the sort of guy with some domestic violence priors and willingness to use 'liberal' as an insult would be other than even-tempered and intellectually honest. Crazy stuff.
At least the judge sounded downright professionally unimpressed, which is nice.
Florida man strikes again....Triple felon owner of a Florida company... Story checks out.
One of the things that came out in court - and likely a big reason for Proven's attempt to get everything sealed - is that the owner had those three felony convictions. In addition to the one mentioned in the article, there was one that the judge was much more interested in: Witness Tampering.
Oops.
Ironically the video in question is in fact showing that the $5 wrench attack was successfully defended against, but the $0.01 shim made of energy drink can, won the day.Defense against lockpicks is like high grade encryption: useful in many respects but still vulnerable to the proverbial "$5 wrench" attack.
The "$5 wrench attack" it's not hitting the lock/locked object, but the person with the means to unlock it.Ironically the video in question is in fact showing that the $5 wrench attack was successfully defended against, but the $0.01 shim made of energy drink can, won the day.
Because it means that defendants have to hire up and spend money. At the least they lose time and sleep. If they don’t live in a state with anti SLAPP laws, they lose time, sleep, and money.Why is that worse? Stupidity taxes are one of the ways to improve civilisation, as well as keeping Porsche and boatbuilders in business. It's much better than settling disputes with private armies, and it ensures that the judiciary will never get bored.
Well, he IS a lawyer, and that fact is sufficient to scare away many bloviating blowhards.I’m surprised nobody like this idiot have tried to sue the lock picking lawyer.
The slightly awkward bit, for locks, is that since their resistance to nondestructive attacks generally costs money (in the terms of more complex designs or tighter tolerances) there's often an implication (not necessarily as often an accurate one) that you should expect more from the more expensive ones; and also the more you are spending on physical durability or for at-least-partially-supervised environments the more weak nondestructive/covert resistance is a problem.Defense against lockpicks is like high grade encryption: useful in many respects but still vulnerable to the proverbial "$5 wrench" attack.
He made a series of videos, basically unpicking provens claims one by one. The one of the amazon locker was to prove he wasn't tampering with the locks ahead of time. he made another video where he had a whole pile of the locks and a whole pile of shims (all clearly cut with as much care and attention as required, ie none) and just opened one after another in seconds to prove that it wasn't just random chance or only a few carefully picked locks being vulnerable.Florida man strikes again....
I remember coming across the vid of McNally grabbing the lock from the Amazon locker and proceeding to pick it in seconds with his liquid death can. Hadn't even heard of him before that but I got a good laugh and then saw the comments describing the crazy shit that led up to that. If I recall he did that to a couple locks in that video. Should have been the end of the story right there but Florida man loves vindictive lawsuits it seems.
They are going to sue Harbor Freight next. And Bruce Schnier for ever saying “security theater” out loud.The whole thing is especially ridiculous in the context of the fact that modern battery tech makes the overwhelming majority of locks you'd ever actually want to carry roughly equals against the zero-skill "angle grinder and act like you are supposed to be doing that" technique.
How many AI slop conspiracy theories do we think the “Sucks to see how many people take everything they see online for face value,” guy has liked on facebook(possibly X, or linkedin, if he's a sophisticated business gentleman)?That says literally everything one needs to know about the company and its culture.