Review: Air Display turns iPad into pricy secondary display

Status
Not open for further replies.
$499 for a 9-inch secondary display? Before you write it off as a terrible idea, read on. The iPad and Air Display may surprise you.

<a href='http://meincmagazine.com/apple/reviews/2010/06/review-air-display-makes-ipad-into-pricey-secondary-display.ars'>Read the whole story</a>
 

Glav

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,084
Neat!

Dawn Falcon":18g5si96 said:
I was rather expecting this functionality to be provided by Apple, as a major selling point!

If it uses 23% of the CPU to do something on that second window, that doesn't sound like something Apple would live with. They'd wait until they got something on the order of Microsoft's Remote Desktop client, where actual commands are issued.

iPad 3.0 feature!

Of course, they'd go one step further, and have it sync with other ipads and iOS devices too. :]
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Glav":2qr55i8p said:
Neat!

Dawn Falcon":2qr55i8p said:
I was rather expecting this functionality to be provided by Apple, as a major selling point!

If it uses 23% of the CPU to do something on that second window, that doesn't sound like something Apple would live with. They'd wait until they got something on the order of Microsoft's Remote Desktop client, where actual commands are issued.

Yea, I mean I was expecting something like RD, rather than an app which is as you and the article note not really optimal...
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Aurich

Director of Many Things
41,285
Ars Staff
oomu":3rp2ktp3 said:
You definitely have to use some html5 video in mpeg4 for all iPad news.

Have to accept people read Ars on an iPad or iPhone.
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

darkowl

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,043
Subscriptor++
Aurich":2flhsc9i said:
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)

It amuses me that Apple has so affected content in this way. If it was anyone else, HP say, who was saying "please put your content in H264!", we'd scoff and continue using Flash (even if FLV is just an MP4 container these days)
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

bartfat

Ars Scholae Palatinae
985
darkowl":a47djf9r said:
Aurich":a47djf9r said:
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)

It amuses me that Apple has so affected content in this way. If it was anyone else, HP say, who was saying "please put your content in H264!", we'd scoff and continue using Flash (even if FLV is just an MP4 container these days)
That's because HP was never a trailblazer.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

issor

Ars Praefectus
5,625
Subscriptor
I'd like to know how to use VNC or similar programs to do this under linux, using any laptop/netbook to act as a secondary screen...

I'm not that familiar with the process as others might be referring to it, but you could create a remote VNC session on your laptop, and then use something like Synergy to 'link' the mouse/input and set up that VNC session left or right of your primary display. Or just use Synergy, and use the resources on your laptop for the secondary...
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

LoneBagel

Well-known member
1,473
Subscriptor
davolfman":1j00mand said:
What amounts to a VNC, NX, or RDP port doesn't count as much news. The only thing that's news is that Apple allows something this useful.

Those are really great apps for remote display of the console or a graphical remote login, but this is for connecting the iPad as a secondary local display as if you were using a DVI or DisplayPort cable, only not! This does not allow you to log into your Mac Pro from a cafe; it does allow you to run something like Komodo Edit on one screen as you run your HTML5 application on the iPad screen as you write it.

If you already own a Mac and an iPad, this could be very handy for those of us who have a hard time functioning without two monitors (anybody that codes, particularly web development will probably agree).
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Tremelune

Ars Praefectus
3,471
Subscriptor++
Having a secondary display is life-changing, for most things you might want to do with a computer. It is the most important thing I miss when using a laptop instead of a desktop.

Small, portable secondary displays are hard to come by. For me, this is the iPad's primary selling point. I've been waiting for someone to get this right.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Cryolithic

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,441
bartfat":141tt3kj said:
darkowl":141tt3kj said:
Aurich":141tt3kj said:
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)

It amuses me that Apple has so affected content in this way. If it was anyone else, HP say, who was saying "please put your content in H264!", we'd scoff and continue using Flash (even if FLV is just an MP4 container these days)
That's because HP was never a trailblazer.
Wow, you're either really young, or swimming in the Kool-Aid. While I'll admit that Apple has definitely done certain things well, they've rarely ever trailblazed.
HP: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 67704.html
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

Not that I think HP is amazing either, but I just don't get it with Apple fanatics, there seems to be some belief that everything that apple has taken and improved upon successfully was theirs from the start. I had a huge discussion last year where a class mate had brought up a number of claims of apple firsts, all of which were not.

Feel free to disagree and cite some firsts that Apple actually created, but I can't think of any off the top of my head right now.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Cryolithic":28oyolxc said:
bartfat":28oyolxc said:
darkowl":28oyolxc said:
Aurich":28oyolxc said:
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)

It amuses me that Apple has so affected content in this way. If it was anyone else, HP say, who was saying "please put your content in H264!", we'd scoff and continue using Flash (even if FLV is just an MP4 container these days)
That's because HP was never a trailblazer.
Wow, you're either really young, or swimming in the Kool-Aid. While I'll admit that Apple has definitely done certain things well, they've rarely ever trailblazed.
HP: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 67704.html
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

Not that I think HP is amazing either, but I just don't get it with Apple fanatics, there seems to be some belief that everything that apple has taken and improved upon successfully was theirs from the start. I had a huge discussion last year where a class mate had brought up a number of claims of apple firsts, all of which were not.

Feel free to disagree and cite some firsts that Apple actually created, but I can't think of any off the top of my head right now.

OK I'll bite, even as a non-Mac fan. The GUI? The mouse? We'll start with those two common claims.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Cryolithic

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,441
Perfect examples. Again, I'm not saying Apple hasn't taken things and made them popular, or work really well, just that they didn't blaze the trail per se.
Gui : something that pre-existed and apple made popular. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphical_ ... ce#History

Same with the mouse: "The first marketed integrated mouse, shipped as a part of a computer and intended for personal computer navigation, came with the Xerox 8010 Star Information System in 1981. However, the mouse remained relatively obscure until the appearance of the Apple Macintosh."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_(computing)#Early_mice

Yes, these items weren't mainstream, but they existed and were in use (not just R&D). Apple built on them (sometimes) and popularized them. Embrace, Extend anyone ;)

edit: just to be clear, I'm not trying to troll, just pointing out a behaviour that I've noticed.
On Topic: That does look really cool!
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

wanorris

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,331
bartfat":2as1mlud said:
darkowl":2as1mlud said:
Aurich":2as1mlud said:
Standardizing our multimedia content into something more friendly to iPads/iPhone/Android whatever is something we're working on currently, we agree. :)

It amuses me that Apple has so affected content in this way. If it was anyone else, HP say, who was saying "please put your content in H264!", we'd scoff and continue using Flash (even if FLV is just an MP4 container these days)
That's because HP was never a trailblazer.
I remember using an HP slate tablet back in what, 2004? Maybe 2005. Either this, or a close variant: http://www.tabletpc2.com/Review-HPTC1100.htm

The iPad may be a better tablet (in a variety of ways), but for the life of me, I can't see how it's more trailblazing, coming years later as it does.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Cryolithic":39gt4qo2 said:
Wow, you're either really young, or swimming in the Kool-Aid. While I'll admit that Apple has definitely done certain things well, they've rarely ever trailblazed.
HP: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 67704.html
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard
Not that I think HP is amazing either, but I just don't get it with Apple fanatics, there seems to be some belief that everything that apple has taken and improved upon successfully was theirs from the start. I had a huge discussion last year where a class mate had brought up a number of claims of apple firsts, all of which were not.
That's a 4 year old article and where can I get a Molecular logic gate so I can build something infinitely detailed and bring it to market? That's always been a dream.

Apple use marketing to sell a product to you and me; not to some BIG corporate and Uni's. Now take a look at the 'other things' that were done by 'other companies' -using MS as a template. You're forcing yourself to do things (usually) the MS way and you see where that gets you. MS has horrible UI design and many companies are so busy just wanting to make a quick buck that design just goes right out the window (no pun intended). They don't really care about people: only the company that buys their wares: Target, EMI, Unilever, Black & Vetch, etc. Sure Apple may not have really 'trailblazed' but they have/are paving the roads to make things that much easier for anybody without a degree or parents in 'computer' fields or fat pockets to come up with good functioning concepts on the fly. Kool-Aid, and fanatics are insulting terms but after so many years in the corporate wildness of MS, people are given the chance to branch out in different directions: Unix, Android, iPods, WebOS, etc…
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

wanorris

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,331
Back to the topic at hand, this is a really cool idea. Another useful mode it would be nice to have: use it as a zoom mode, with the ability to pan to different locations on the screen and zoom in and out on details.

Also, I'd love to use this with control surfaces for virtual music instruments, as the world's most elaborate "programmable remote" for an HTPC, etc. Or to run older Bioware-style RPGs, for that matter.

If this were available for Windows 7 and used the Win 7 multitouch support effectively, I would definitely consider getting an iPad.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

rx2

Ars Scholae Palatinae
652
Tremelune":1cucylhs said:
Having a secondary display is life-changing, for most things you might want to do with a computer. It is the most important thing I miss when using a laptop instead of a desktop.

Small, portable secondary displays are hard to come by. For me, this is the iPad's primary selling point. I've been waiting for someone to get this right.

I think it depends on the individual. I had 2 monitors and it wasn't for me, So I got a 30" and do almost everything off of a the 30", though I do keep my email client open on the old 20". So I'm at 95/5 split. I don't miss the dual display on a laptop.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
mtasoriya":3crsjkvb said:
a widget only version of this would be so great. or a permanent expose feature. So all the windows are opn in expose mode on the ipad, and you touch the one you want to use in the mac display
http://www.spammy site you can't see!/health-articles/acai-max-cleanse-does-acai-max-cleanse-remove-extra-pounds-2590765.html

12. And of course, NO SPAMMING. No commercial-oriented posts, and no flooding with useless content or content designed to engage readers into forum wars or trolling other sites. This includes signatures with links to your personal blog, project, or commercial product as well as usernames that contain URLs in whole or part.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Cryolithic

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,441
Player_16":wwrl4qvc said:
Cryolithic":wwrl4qvc said:
Wow, you're either really young, or swimming in the Kool-Aid. While I'll admit that Apple has definitely done certain things well, they've rarely ever trailblazed.
HP: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 67704.html
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard
Not that I think HP is amazing either, but I just don't get it with Apple fanatics, there seems to be some belief that everything that apple has taken and improved upon successfully was theirs from the start. I had a huge discussion last year where a class mate had brought up a number of claims of apple firsts, all of which were not.
That's a 4 year old article and where can I get a Molecular logic gate so I can build something infinitely detailed and bring it to market? That's always been a dream.

Apple use marketing to sell a product to you and me; not to some BIG corporate and Uni's. Now take a look at the 'other things' that were done by 'other companies' -using MS as a template. You're forcing yourself to do things (usually) the MS way and you see where that gets you. MS has horrible UI design and many companies are so busy just wanting to make a quick buck that design just goes right out the window (no pun intended). They don't really care about people: only the company that buys their wares: Target, EMI, Unilever, Black & Vetch, etc. Sure Apple may not have really 'trailblazed' but they have/are paving the roads to make things that much easier for anybody without a degree or parents in 'computer' fields or fat pockets to come up with good functioning concepts on the fly. Kool-Aid, and fanatics are insulting terms but after so many years in the corporate wildness of MS, people are given the chance to branch out in different directions: Unix, Android, iPods, WebOS, etc…

Sure it was a 4year old article. The point was to show that HP was a "trailblazer".

I'm trying to make sense of the rest of this, but it's difficult.

From what I can pick out:
With an apple product, you're forcing yourself to do it the apple way, how is this any different? In fact, the iProducts are more closed than even MS platforms. You can only develop for them using apple's products, the way they want, using their Ad platform (as an example). BTW, I use linux for about 40% of my daily usage.

UI design is fairly subjective. We can agree to disagree on this, no point debating further.

If you believe Apple cares about "people" any more than *any* other corporation, I've got some ocean front property in arizona I'd like to sell, cheap.

I really can't see what apple is doing to help people come up with concepts on the fly...I really don't understand the purpose of this sentence other than standard Apple cheerleading.

Kool-Aid and fanatic may be insulting if you wish to take it that way, however I don't see what it has to do with the rest of the sentence, nor what the rest of that sentence has to do with anything that I said.

Perhaps you didn't notice that I was actually giving apple praise. As I said, they do a lot of things very well. My point was that little of it was "trailblazing".

Next time, try to understand the point being made, rather than assuming an apple attack and jumping to defense.

Edited to remove flambaitiness
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Status
Not open for further replies.