OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion: the Ars Technica review

Status
Not open for further replies.

anurodhp

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,468
timacheson":1cp0a2ep said:
WARNING: Apple's new "Mountain Lion" OS is infected with a serious virus.

MORCUT VIRUS CHARACTERISTICS
- Allows others to access the computer
- Drops more malware
- Downloads code from the internet
- Reduces system security
- Dropped by malware
- Leaves files on computer
- Enables remote access

More info: http://www.sophos.com/en-us/threat-cent ... cut-A.aspx

Apple is institutionally complacent about security. They famously never even attend the regular Black Hat security conference which everyone else in the industry supports. Apple customers are therefore advised to exercise special caution to ensure that Apple's negligence doesn't leave them with a serious problem.


this is the funniest post i have seen in a while.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
keath":1dc1bm1e said:
jon.hartmann":1dc1bm1e said:
Given that this is an incremental update and you spent 24 pages going over it, I'm hoping to see 25+ on Windows 8... and no I'm not a Windows fanboy (I'm in the process of switching to Mac), I'm just tired of seeing what feels like disproportional Apple coverage.

Clearly you are new here.

John has written these amazingly detailed reviews of every version of Mac OS X since it first arrived. He sets the standard for what a review can be; discussing not only the superficialities, but digging in and exposing what's beneath, and not discussed in the ad copy.

The Windows reviews are written by Peter Bright.

http://meincmagazine.com/information-tech ... the-review

I expect you will see similar detailed coverage of Windows 8.
There's a high probability that the Windows 8 review will be longer because it is so different.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Dippyskoodlez

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
153
John":1hg0mlij said:
Danathar":1hg0mlij said:
Was there something in there about PERFORMANCE versus the last version? I did not see it.
In my testing, performance seemed to be about the same as Lion.

Care to compare OGL performance?

It feels radically different to me. Maybe they restricted the 650m driver to ML... (Mature 3d driver.)
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ralyks

Seniorius Lurkius
3
The review seemed to overlook the main questions I had. It seems a note on upgradability from Snow Leopard (and/or earlier versions in general) should be added to the installation section. Does anyone know how upgrades from snow leopard will work?

Secondly, I had a lot of trouble finding the review of the airplay features. Finally I found it under the section on preferences, but maybe more detail on the features or at least what is missing? For example, can you AirPlay from QuickTime player now? Can other apps like rdio implement AirPlay streaming too? Also omitted was any notes on the feature of using an airplay device as sound output in the system preferences.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

xoa

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,416
Subscriptor
As always, thank you for the thorough review. I certainly have decidedly mixed feelings about many of Apples choices with OS X (although at the same time some are unabashed improvements). I certainly don't disagree with all their apparent goals, but I think their implementation has often left much to be desired. All too often the theme of "the power user must give up features to make it easier in general" has come up, but for at least a few cases I'm convinced it's a false dichotomy, and that it's possible to make everyone happy.

One significant thing that you didn't cover (perhaps because it remains below most people's radar) is the state of Apple's cryptographic frameworks going forward. Apple deprecated their (very crusty) old system in Lion, but I think that multifactor security has the potential to be very important going forward. It's an excellent example of something that is both far more powerful and far easier, and Apple is in an excellent position to push it to the general consumer market.

Regardless though it's great to have a solid overview of what's new, including (or even particularly) features I'm not interested in myself but I may be required to have knowledge of. Thanks again, and here's to the next few years as well.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
One question - I've seen several reviews mention that performance seemed better with ML. Right now I'm stuck on the original aluminum iMac, the mid-2007 model, with a 2.4ghz Core 2 Duo and maxed out with 4 GB of ram. Performance took a noticeable drop after I upgraded from Snow Leopard to Lion. Anyone have any idea if it may improve a bit under Mountain Lion?

I know the obvious answer is to upgrade from a five-year-old computer, but I'd prefer an iMac and I'm waiting on a refresh, and even then I may have to wait a little longer thanks to some unforeseen expenses with my car.

Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Kwincy

Seniorius Lurkius
15
fferitt25":3dfa4vg4 said:
But hang on a second. For a desktop OS in the year 2012, which direction is "forward," anyway? The obvious answer is "toward iOS," but Lion proved that it's not quite that simple. And really, there has to be more to it than compulsive imitation, otherwise why continue development of the Mac platform at all?
Hell you can point that out for any OS - not just Apple's.

Win 7 was a new wrapper for Vista was a new wrapper for XP. Win 8 is supposedly a new iteration with minimal legacy elements - but I guarantee - M$ won't hit the bullseye dead on fresh out of the gate.

Don't slam Apple for that - it's an industry-wide issue that has been around since the start of the industry.

And it's amazing how after 30-50 years of software development - people still can't seem to code much of anything correctly.

What happened to learning from predecessors ?

Remember those old jokes about what if M$ and Apple were car manufacturers and how badly their cars would run (or breakdown) ?

Whart if they were architects putting up a new 1000 story building and they discovered a series of flaws in the structure halfway thru constreuction ? Building construction does not have the luxury of carrying flaws over for a design for 10-20 years or buildings collapse and people get hurt.

You'd think that software companies would know how to write software correctly after 30 years.



It's really hard to take you seriously when you use "M$" in any of your comments, that kinda stuff is old. One could argue that the new "M$" might be Activision, Capcom, EA, Google, or even Apple. Heck, both Google and Apple seem to be all about the money, lawsuits and bickering with other companies as of late.

That said, great review!
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
I have to agree with another posted who said a Siracusa review is like Christmas in July... ;-)

There is obviously way too much here to comment on, but here's a few things that jumped out at me:

Like any other application purchased from the Mac App Store, these OS installers are updated in-place as part of the normal Mac App Store update process when new versions are released. It's as if your Mac OS X 10.6.0 installation disc gradually morphed into a 10.6.1 installer, then a 10.6.2 installer, and so on. This eliminates the tedious two-step process of installing an operating system from your original media and then immediately downloading hundreds of megabytes of updates.

That's awesome. In other words, the installers are updated "in the background" (in a sense) so that if and when you do need one, you already have the latest version. Really smart.

And what about new, "Untitled" documents that have never been saved anywhere? Can you guess where TextEdit in Mountain Lion chooses to autosave those? Ding ding! That's right, in iCloud. Open TextEdit on another Mac and you'll have access to all of your unsaved TextEdit documents.

Ha! That's crazy (good, that is).

Mountain Lion allows applications to go into full-screen mode on any display, not just the primary one. This is swell, but the other screens are still covered with linen.

Damn! That's probably the biggest thing I was hoping for. I get that there are weird implementation issues that have to be dealt with, but I would have thought that by now they could have come up with a solution.

Mission Control now has an option to display windows independent of their application. The resulting arrangement is a bit haphazard, but it does show more of each window's content.

That's effectively the reincarnation of the "original" Exposé, where all windows are scaled down only enough so that they can all appear without overlapping, and no more. That changed in Snow Leopard when they formatted them in even rows (which admittedly did look neater). Then in Lion, it went away entirely as they switched to grouping windows by application.

I actually like the grouping a lot more than I first thought I would; the big app name and icon makes it a lot easier to find a specific Safari window, for example, than when you have 15 windows from different apps strewn all over. But there's one thing I wish they would change: have the two-finger swipe up on a group perform app Exposé (what you get if you hit fn-F10), so that you could see giant thumbnails of just that app's windows with no overlap. That would be perfect.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

hrpanjwani

Ars Scholae Palatinae
885
Subscriptor
Nice review John. I got through around a third of the ML download while reading your article. :)

Not a lot on the spatial finder this time around though? Are you giving up on it?

Edit: Forgot to mention this. Loved the section on Scenekit. Your 3-D image looks very nice, but it feels like the letters are are going to drop out of my iPad !!!

http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/u ... xt-big.png
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

hrpanjwani

Ars Scholae Palatinae
885
Subscriptor
sunshinerag":1ls51an9 said:
Not sure whether this has been asked somewhere before, but if you use FileVault along with ICloud to store documents, does it mean whats stored on ICloud is the encrypted data.. i.e even Apple can't read it if it wants too?

Well you key is stored on apples servers in case you lose it and need to retrieve it. So they can use it to read your iCloud data.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

FuzzyPuffin

Smack-Fu Master, in training
58
mamoore1982":3i591ewo said:
Performance took a noticeable drop after I upgraded from Snow Leopard to Lion. Anyone have any idea if it may improve a bit under Mountain Lion?
It certainly won't be worse. Scrolling in safari will be better thanks to Core Animation (that's the only performance improvement I noticed.)

Klatzy":3i591ewo said:
So it looks like the greyscale icons in the sidebar and for file folders is still in 10.8? I was hoping for the return of color. Apple why do you love gray!!

They love grey because it "emphasizes your content," Jobs explained once. This logic breaks down in the Finder, though, when the sidebar *is* my content, and in practice it just makes icons harder to distinguish.

I actually like the grouping a lot more than I first thought I would; the big app name and icon makes it a lot easier to find a specific Safari window, for example, than when you have 15 windows from different apps strewn all over. But there's one thing I wish they would change: have the two-finger swipe up on a group perform app Exposé (what you get if you hit fn-F10), so that you could see giant thumbnails of just that app's windows with no overlap. That would be perfect.

I agree that would be very nice, and it puzzles me that is not the way it works now. Why does two-finger scroll move the windows just a little bit? Doesn't make any sense.

My ideal Expose/Mission Control solution would be that and a separate dedicated view of All Window Expose (like app expose) and that improved version of grouped window expose. Both have their uses--grouped window is better with a ton of windows, but I think all window expose is more useful the majority of the time. I switched back to it as soon as I started using ML and haven't looked back.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

thenewperson

Smack-Fu Master, in training
75
andrei.timoshenko":1brk9p84 said:
The disappearance of RSS from Safari is a shame. I never used Safari as my RSS reader, obviously, but the RSS icon as a quick link to all of the RSS feeds available on the given page was an incredibly useful feature. Any alternative to hunting around for RSS feed links manually? Is there scope for having this done by an extension?

Yes, there is an extension by Daniel Jalkut (Red Sweater Software). It mostly replicates the functionality lost, but opens in an RSS reader instead. http://red-sweater.com/temp/SubscribeToFeed.zip
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Hap

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,232
Subscriptor++
ecotone":3u5co9i6 said:
Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ecotone

Ars Praefectus
4,696
Subscriptor
Hap":1at4zd62 said:
ecotone":1at4zd62 said:
Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.

Um, nothing whatsoever here in three different browsers. WTF?

EDIT: Should it be indexed in the PDF Technical Library? The last item I see there is "How software-defined radio could revolutionize wireless" from 7/7.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Hap

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,232
Subscriptor++
ecotone":2n9bi9cb said:
Hap":2n9bi9cb said:
ecotone":2n9bi9cb said:
Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.

Um, nothing whatsoever here in three different browsers. WTF?

EDIT: Should it be indexed in the PDF Technical Library? The last item I see there is "How software-defined radio could revolutionize wireless" from 7/7.

I'd post a pic, but I'm on an iPad..
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

tim1724

Seniorius Lurkius
2
Hey John,

I believe the AppleScrollAnimationEnabled preference has been renamed to NSScrollAnimationEnabled. (Why? I think the offical reasoning is along the lines of user-configured preferences having an Apple prefix whereas preferences which are internal to AppKit and not exposed to the user having the old NS prefix)

so if you really hate the scrolling animation, try

defaults write -g NSScrollAnimationEnabled -bool NO

I haven't tried it myself; I like the animation.




From the AppKit Release Notes:

Smooth Scrolling

Smooth scrolling has been removed from user preferences. A consequence of this is that the default name has changed. Any use of @"AppleScrollAnimationEnabled" should be replaced with @"NSScrollAnimationEnabled". If you need to determine the default state of smooth scrolling, the following code will return the correct BOOL value
[[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] boolForKey:mad:"NSScrollAnimationEnabled"];
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Oelph

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,658
I don't understand why Apple insist on making application interfaces mirror their physical counterparts. What purpose does it serve? In many cases it hampers or detracts from the application, such as the leather flap in the lower left corner of the notes app.

I also thought there were many negatives highlighted in this review. It would seem Apple often experiment with new designs and features on users which irritate and cause inflexibility. I can see why they do it. They've been highly successful with iOS in dictating to people how they should use and interact with a device. But a lot of the changes in each iteration of OSX feel like a failure in this mission. They're not giving people what they want. They're telling you how it's going to be and be damned if you don't like it. A bit like the fiasco with Final Cut.

Lastly Apple seem to opt for really basic functionality in their apps and are slow to add expected functionality. The notes app is basic. Safari on iOS is awkward (I.e. you have to create a new folder before choosing to create a bookmark when often you only realise you want or need a new folder for said bookmark when you're creating it). I do like Apple products but I feel frustrated more and more at their design decisions.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

foresmac108

Ars Praefectus
4,077
Subscriptor++
ecotone":4dp3gtp6 said:
Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
Here's more info: http://meincmagazine.com/apple/2012/07/ge ... or-e-book/

If you are a subscriber and logged in, you should see the links near the top of the article in the right sidebar.
20120725-ek21cui1391q4mxx64krjpir15.png
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Status
Not open for further replies.