timacheson":1cp0a2ep said:WARNING: Apple's new "Mountain Lion" OS is infected with a serious virus.
MORCUT VIRUS CHARACTERISTICS
- Allows others to access the computer
- Drops more malware
- Downloads code from the internet
- Reduces system security
- Dropped by malware
- Leaves files on computer
- Enables remote access
More info: http://www.sophos.com/en-us/threat-cent ... cut-A.aspx
Apple is institutionally complacent about security. They famously never even attend the regular Black Hat security conference which everyone else in the industry supports. Apple customers are therefore advised to exercise special caution to ensure that Apple's negligence doesn't leave them with a serious problem.
There's a high probability that the Windows 8 review will be longer because it is so different.keath":1dc1bm1e said:jon.hartmann":1dc1bm1e said:Given that this is an incremental update and you spent 24 pages going over it, I'm hoping to see 25+ on Windows 8... and no I'm not a Windows fanboy (I'm in the process of switching to Mac), I'm just tired of seeing what feels like disproportional Apple coverage.
Clearly you are new here.
John has written these amazingly detailed reviews of every version of Mac OS X since it first arrived. He sets the standard for what a review can be; discussing not only the superficialities, but digging in and exposing what's beneath, and not discussed in the ad copy.
The Windows reviews are written by Peter Bright.
http://meincmagazine.com/information-tech ... the-review
I expect you will see similar detailed coverage of Windows 8.
John":1hg0mlij said:In my testing, performance seemed to be about the same as Lion.Danathar":1hg0mlij said:Was there something in there about PERFORMANCE versus the last version? I did not see it.
fferitt25":ra9xvv31 said:I wonder why the ARS resident Apple Newsie (Chris Foresman) doesn't get to write the Mac OS reviews ?
Hmm....
fferitt25":3dfa4vg4 said:Hell you can point that out for any OS - not just Apple's.But hang on a second. For a desktop OS in the year 2012, which direction is "forward," anyway? The obvious answer is "toward iOS," but Lion proved that it's not quite that simple. And really, there has to be more to it than compulsive imitation, otherwise why continue development of the Mac platform at all?
Win 7 was a new wrapper for Vista was a new wrapper for XP. Win 8 is supposedly a new iteration with minimal legacy elements - but I guarantee - M$ won't hit the bullseye dead on fresh out of the gate.
Don't slam Apple for that - it's an industry-wide issue that has been around since the start of the industry.
And it's amazing how after 30-50 years of software development - people still can't seem to code much of anything correctly.
What happened to learning from predecessors ?
Remember those old jokes about what if M$ and Apple were car manufacturers and how badly their cars would run (or breakdown) ?
Whart if they were architects putting up a new 1000 story building and they discovered a series of flaws in the structure halfway thru constreuction ? Building construction does not have the luxury of carrying flaws over for a design for 10-20 years or buildings collapse and people get hurt.
You'd think that software companies would know how to write software correctly after 30 years.
Like any other application purchased from the Mac App Store, these OS installers are updated in-place as part of the normal Mac App Store update process when new versions are released. It's as if your Mac OS X 10.6.0 installation disc gradually morphed into a 10.6.1 installer, then a 10.6.2 installer, and so on. This eliminates the tedious two-step process of installing an operating system from your original media and then immediately downloading hundreds of megabytes of updates.
And what about new, "Untitled" documents that have never been saved anywhere? Can you guess where TextEdit in Mountain Lion chooses to autosave those? Ding ding! That's right, in iCloud. Open TextEdit on another Mac and you'll have access to all of your unsaved TextEdit documents.
Mountain Lion allows applications to go into full-screen mode on any display, not just the primary one. This is swell, but the other screens are still covered with linen.
Mission Control now has an option to display windows independent of their application. The resulting arrangement is a bit haphazard, but it does show more of each window's content.
LOL! That's great.hd580":1364zarh said:The Marco.org Review of John Siracusa’s Review of OS X 10.8 Mountain Liongonerill":1364zarh said:tl;dr
sunshinerag":1ls51an9 said:Not sure whether this has been asked somewhere before, but if you use FileVault along with ICloud to store documents, does it mean whats stored on ICloud is the encrypted data.. i.e even Apple can't read it if it wants too?
It certainly won't be worse. Scrolling in safari will be better thanks to Core Animation (that's the only performance improvement I noticed.)mamoore1982":3i591ewo said:Performance took a noticeable drop after I upgraded from Snow Leopard to Lion. Anyone have any idea if it may improve a bit under Mountain Lion?
Klatzy":3i591ewo said:So it looks like the greyscale icons in the sidebar and for file folders is still in 10.8? I was hoping for the return of color. Apple why do you love gray!!
I actually like the grouping a lot more than I first thought I would; the big app name and icon makes it a lot easier to find a specific Safari window, for example, than when you have 15 windows from different apps strewn all over. But there's one thing I wish they would change: have the two-finger swipe up on a group perform app Exposé (what you get if you hit fn-F10), so that you could see giant thumbnails of just that app's windows with no overlap. That would be perfect.
andrei.timoshenko":1brk9p84 said:The disappearance of RSS from Safari is a shame. I never used Safari as my RSS reader, obviously, but the RSS icon as a quick link to all of the RSS feeds available on the given page was an incredibly useful feature. Any alternative to hunting around for RSS feed links manually? Is there scope for having this done by an extension?
PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.ecotone":3u5co9i6 said:Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
Hap":1at4zd62 said:PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.ecotone":1at4zd62 said:Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
ecotone":2n9bi9cb said:Hap":2n9bi9cb said:PDF was available from the beginning for me. *Checks again*, yep link is still there. There is a "Premier" header just to the right of the article headline and below it are all the subscriptor options - including the PDF.ecotone":2n9bi9cb said:Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.
Um, nothing whatsoever here in three different browsers. WTF?
EDIT: Should it be indexed in the PDF Technical Library? The last item I see there is "How software-defined radio could revolutionize wireless" from 7/7.
Here's more info: http://meincmagazine.com/apple/2012/07/ge ... or-e-book/ecotone":4dp3gtp6 said:Ars folks: any idea as to when any of the PDF or other digital versions will be available? I'm not seeing any links anywhere on the site.