Mutant crayfish got rid of males, and its clones are taking over the world

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eldorito

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,994
I, for one, welcome our new pinchy overlords....

Amazing range, although how mich of a threat does this pose, simply by being able to breed endlessly? Also, I'm really curious why we don't see more large animals like this. Sure, there's likely long term downsides, but is it just that thry can spread with globalisation and not wind up in a tiny area and essentially overcompete to death?
 
Upvote
25 (29 / -4)

BSpiros

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
176
Subscriptor++
Upvote
156 (171 / -15)

DAG42

Ars Scholae Palatinae
610
This will be a handy response for all of the "we've never observed evolution in human lifetimes" trolls.
Not really. For starters, they're immune to evidence and facts. Secondly, for every scientific explanation given, they can come up with a myriad of excuses to deny scientific reality. Even when the excuses suck or pile up to improbable odds, they are content with their excuses.

... don't forget there is the super awesome E. coli experiment on hand if learning is the goal.
 
Upvote
45 (54 / -9)

andygates

Ars Praefectus
5,794
Subscriptor
Playing Subnautica. This would come in useful.

Is this edible? Would it make a viable farmed food source? Could we send it to Mars ;)?

According to Nature it's tasty enough that people in Madagascar are deliberately introducing them to rice paddies, from which they inevitably spread.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0467-9

But having them in a tank would update the cyberpunk staples of catfish and tilapia :)
 
Upvote
26 (28 / -2)

Edgar Allan Esquire

Ars Praefectus
3,101
Subscriptor
I, for one, welcome our new pinchy overlords....

Amazing range, although how mich of a threat does this pose, simply by being able to breed endlessly? Also, I'm really curious why we don't see more large animals like this. Sure, there's likely long term downsides, but is it just that thry can spread with globalisation and not wind up in a tiny area and essentially overcompete to death?
Lack of genetic diversity starts to become an issue when diseases crop up. If I recall, Tasmanian Devils have such a similar makeup that cancer can spread from one to another without triggering an immune response.

Given the mention of surplus chromosomes in crayfish, I wonder if an epigenetic influence on expression could create enough of a generational difference that one bad disease doesn't wipe them all out.
 
Upvote
52 (53 / -1)

lewax00

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,402
I wonder if this doesn't present the one valid use case of an infectious biological control agent. A virus that is highly targeted to an essentially monoculture population that would effectively wipe it out almost instantly.
For example, see bananas, which are also a population made entirely of clones. All it takes is one good disease to take hold and they're all wiped out. It's happened before, and it'll likely happen again.
 
Upvote
71 (71 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,936
Subscriptor
1) Please don't buy these as pets. There is too much danger of them being "set free" and becoming invasives. As far as I know the only US states to ban them so far are Missouri and Tennessee, but it's best to consider them off-limits.

2) Even if you want them as pets, they will destroy nearly any aquatic plant in the tank and the adults are also territorial/cannibalistic.

3) As far as human food, most Procambarus sp. are "dwarf" crayfish and not very desirable. P. clarkii, the Red Swamp Crayfish, is about the only good eatin' and tend to be larger.
 
Upvote
105 (107 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Once science becomes sufficiently advanced, males will become obsolete. There is hope for humanity if this is the trajectory. Most of our attempts to eliminate ourselves have been testosterone-fueled destructive instincts. An eventual all female society may result in some common sense, an end to the glorification of violence and greed, and best of all -- a chance.

Man, your post history is just a litany of useless and flame-baity garbage, isn't it? I think I'm gonna dump your ass on the ignore list and forget you ever existed.
 
Upvote
45 (58 / -13)

jonfr

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,340
I was trying to find the low / high temperature range for this crayfish. I didn't find it. Far as I know this species has not established it self in Iceland but has been present in aquarium trade for some time now and it must have escaped in some cases or let loose into rivers in Iceland.

But winters in Iceland are long and cold and that might just kill any crayfish in the wild right off after the summer (that are also not that warm either).
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

famousringo

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,165
Subscriptor
I, for one, welcome our new pinchy overlords....

Amazing range, although how mich of a threat does this pose, simply by being able to breed endlessly? Also, I'm really curious why we don't see more large animals like this. Sure, there's likely long term downsides, but is it just that thry can spread with globalisation and not wind up in a tiny area and essentially overcompete to death?
The NYT article I read went into this a little bit:

Asexual breeding is a powerful short term strategy because it allows a critter to reproduce more efficiently, as we can see by how quickly this goober has spread.

But it's a crappy long term strategy because all these crayfish are almost genetically identical with limited ability to develop and re-combine new adaptations due to ditching sex. It's a monoculture, vulnerable to the first threat that penetrates the defenses it currently has.

We don't see it often because it's a great way to get plagued into extinction.
 
Upvote
76 (76 / 0)

PurpleBadger

Ars Praetorian
469
Subscriptor++
1) Please don't buy these as pets. There is too much danger of them being "set free" and becoming invasives. As far as I know the only US states to ban them so far are Missouri and Tennessee, but it's best to consider them off-limits.

2) Even if you want them as pets, they will destroy nearly any aquatic plant in the tank and the adults are also territorial/cannibalistic.

3) As far as human food, most Procambarus sp. are "dwarf" crayfish and not very desirable. P. clarkii, the Red Swamp Crayfish, is about the only good eatin' and tend to be larger.

I can vouch for this. I use to keep native species in some of my tanks, partly out of fun and partly because they're hell on snails-- snails help restrain algae, but snail reproduction puts rabbits and rats to shame. Crayfish love to dig and manipulate their environment and will disrupt a tank to their satisfaction, digging holes under rocks, exposing undergravel filters, eating plants, and taking opportunistic pot-shots at any fish that aren't wary.

I'm surprised that any pet store actually sells crayfish for aquarium fauna. Most people likely don't know what they're getting.

Mmm... red crayfish. Them's good eatin'.
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)

Sarty

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,978
Says the guy who brags about being a "thug".

If the genetics of two different females can be combined easily and reliably to provide viable female only offspring, (needing of course one of the females to bring the baby to term) - give me one real sound rationale that males of the species need to continue?
I'm sure that you relish the extinction of now-minor indigenous languages with equal enthusiasm...?
 
Upvote
-10 (5 / -15)

ztechrdr

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
125
Subscriptor
Two quotes from the article:

“The species seems to have three sets of chromosomes instead of the usual two.”

“The new genome sequence confirms that this was the case, as marmokrebs carries two sets of nearly identical chromosomes, along with a third that's more distantly related. (Since crayfish apparently have a lot of chromosomes to begin with, this means that these animals carry around 276 individual chromosomes).”

I don’t understand what this is saying. How do the 276 chromosomes come into it?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Says the guy who brags about being a "thug".

If the genetics of two different females can be combined easily and reliably to provide viable female only offspring, (needing of course one of the females to bring the baby to term) - give me one real sound rationale that males of the species need to continue?
I'm sure that you relish the extinction of now-minor indigenous languages with equal enthusiasm...?

Stop feeding the troll. Just check through this person's post history and you'll see the pattern emerge rather handily. Ageist, sexist, and not especially bright. Ignore and move on.
 
Upvote
56 (57 / -1)

0bliv!on

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,695
Once science becomes sufficiently advanced, males will become obsolete. There is hope for humanity if this is the trajectory. Most of our attempts to eliminate ourselves have been testosterone-fueled destructive instincts. An eventual all female society may result in some common sense, an end to the glorification of violence and greed, and best of all -- a chance.
If you're a guy, you should try out that hypothesis on yourself and let us know the results.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)
Status
Not open for further replies.