Indifference and ignorance: Delving deep into the Clinton e-mail saga

Status
You're currently viewing only ZagNust's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Not open for further replies.

ZagNust

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
138
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31548183#p31548183:3k1d0qhn said:
Snark218[/url]":3k1d0qhn]
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31548141#p31548141:3k1d0qhn said:
Isahaya[/url]":3k1d0qhn]Sounds familiar. This guy did very similar things and was prosecuted by the FBI for it:
https://www.fbi.gov/sacramento/press-re ... -materials

The major - and obviously critical - difference being that they could establish clear intent to mishandle classified information in his case. They could not do so in Clinton's case. That's not a minor point, and it doesn't make what she did equivalent to his case, as much as conservatives desperately want to conflate them.

Actually, the statute is very precise; mishandling classified information is a violation of federal law. Intent does not play a role in this case.
 
Upvote
-10 (4 / -14)
Status
You're currently viewing only ZagNust's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Not open for further replies.