The EX60 senses a passenger's size and weight, determining how much force to use.
See full article...
See full article...
Wearing a seatbelt in the back of a car still isn’t mandatory in all 50 US states, in 2026.
The Spinal Tap jokes just write themselves.Volvo’s new system pushes the load-limiting profiles from three to 11, marking a major increase in adjustability. It’s kind of like an audio system, Ljung Aust muses.
Whoa, now. Next you're going to tell me tha Al Gore didn't invent the internet!Volvo did not invent the seat belt, it innovated by proposing a three-point fasting method. Be careful.
So they invented the three point seat belt?Volvo did not invent the seat belt, it innovated by proposing a three-point fasting method. Be careful.
This is the thing that's agonizing. So much investment has gone into [some shit mommy used to do for you] as a service, [whatever] as an app, gig economy exploitation, and chatbots that I think we're falling behind on tangible, real technological innovation that materially improves lives.Wow, a good news story in tech...very refreshing. Unless, of course this feature will become subscription-based next year at this time!
The tech bros can't crash soon enough so we can get back to creating and improving things for real again.
We can still invent the three seashells.Really thought Volvo's new safety system would take a page from the tech in Demolition Man, but I walk away disappointed yet again
View attachment 127026
That was done so the writer could have some experience comparing seat belts on the plane vs those in the caryeah but they didn’t fly the author to Sweden
Also as someone who, when distracted while driving as a wee 16 year old lad, drove his Saab partway into a ditch, hit a driveway embankment with enough force to bend the unibody chassis like a banana and catch a couple feet of air, caught the edge of a tree on hte other side of the driveaway embankment hard enough to lodge the side light pod into the trunk, and then came to a fairly sudden rest against some smaller trees in the woods just past that larger tree... I also support these safety developments.As someone who has had a nice stripe of bruise laid across his torso from shoulder to hip by a seat belt in a crash, I think this is extremely good.
Saab developed a passive system (amusingly called Saab Active Head Restraint)in their seats in the late 90s to reduce whiplash in the case of rear impact collisions. It was actually a pretty clever system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_Active_Head_Restraints. RIP Saab...I'd be careful about "No other automaker has the same commitment to road safety as Volvo"; Mercedes, as a comparison, invented the hydraulic brake system, the crumple zone and passenger safety cell, collapsible steering column, pretensioned seatbelts, air bags, ABS, stability control, pre-safe collision detection system, and others.
This is a legitimate advance on Volvo's part, and I'm not trying to detract from it, but ease up on the hyperbole please. Lots of auto manufacturers have improved safety.
It seems your list of achievements by Mercedes does not stand up to scrutiny very well. I see that ABS, airbags and ESP have complex histories that do not fit Mercedes "inventing" them. No idea how you claim that Mercedes invented hydraulic brakes. (Did not look into all your claims.)I'd be careful about "No other automaker has the same commitment to road safety as Volvo"; Mercedes, as a comparison, invented the hydraulic brake system, the crumple zone and passenger safety cell, collapsible steering column, pretensioned seatbelts, air bags, ABS, stability control, pre-safe collision detection system, and others.
This is a legitimate advance on Volvo's part, and I'm not trying to detract from it, but ease up on the hyperbole please. Lots of auto manufacturers have improved safety.
Tesla vehicles use a combination of seat-mounted weight sensors (Occupant Classification System) and, in newer models, camera/radar data to determine passenger weight for airbag deployment, which directly influences seat belt pretensioner force
. The system generally distinguishes between children (under 20 lbs or 9 kg) and adults (over 100 lbs or 45 kg) to determine whether the front passenger airbag should be active.
Key Aspects of Tesla's Seat Belt Force System:
- Weight Thresholds (Front Passenger):
- Under 20 lbs (9 kg): Passenger airbag is usually OFF.
- 20-100 lbs (9-45 kg): Airbag status may fluctuate between ON and OFF depending on seating position and weight.
- Over 100 lbs (45 kg): Airbag is ON.
- Pretensioner Function: During a collision, front seat belts use pretensioners that activate based on the force of the impact to reduce slack.
- Camera-Based Safety: Some models use cabin cameras to monitor occupant positioning to adjust seat belt behavior and improve safety, in addition to weight sensors.
You'd have benefited from some side curtain airbags, it sounds like. Airbag triggers are more than just the front bumper, nowadays. We also underrate how vastly we have improved the structural rigidity of cars in the last 30 years. My accident was a short flight into a deep arroyo, and I hit hard enough that the rear hatch of a 1995 Grand Cherokee popped open and couldn't close again, and several doors couldn't be opened. Now? The front end would have crumpled, but the body would have been fine, doors would have opened.Also as someone who, when distracted while driving as a wee 16 year old lad, drove his Saab partway into a ditch, hit a driveway embankment with enough force to bend the unibody chassis like a banana and catch a couple feet of air, caught the edge of a tree on hte other side of the driveaway embankment hard enough to lodge the side light pod into the trunk, and then came to a fairly sudden rest against some smaller trees in the woods just past that larger tree... I also support these safety developments.
Heartily cosigned. Glad I got that out of the way when I was still nice and rubbery. I had abrasions on my forearms from the airbag too, and that's much less of an issue these days.The funny thing is, I still VERY vividly remember ragdolling with the seatbelt holding me in place with what felt like a very extreme amount of pressure on my shoulders and torso. The airbags didn't fire due to the very acute angle I glanced off of the tree which was probably for the best as the seatbelt held me quite firmly in place. But yea, even at that young age where I was mostly made of rubber, I'm sure I was sore and bruised up. And I know I had some friction burns on my shoulder from the force of the belt after it locked up.
Anything that can be done to safely reduce the "sudden stop" of a car accident (including the airbags firing at your face and chest) is a worthwhile endeavor, IMO.
and a whole bunch of auto manufacturers steadfastly fought against those safety innovations.I'd be careful about "No other automaker has the same commitment to road safety as Volvo"; Mercedes, as a comparison, invented the hydraulic brake system, the crumple zone and passenger safety cell, collapsible steering column, pretensioned seatbelts, air bags, ABS, stability control, pre-safe collision detection system, and others.
This is a legitimate advance on Volvo's part, and I'm not trying to detract from it, but ease up on the hyperbole please. Lots of auto manufacturers have improved safety.
The Volvo system introduces eleven increments based on weight and force applied to the body. As TFA notes, previous modern systems had three, including Tesla:How is the Volvo system new or different from other cars ?
I think since the below was implemented a year or so ago, Rivian or BMW or Lucid might already have the same implementation
Count them! One, two, three! Three beautiful settings, ah ah ahhh!
- Weight Thresholds (Front Passenger):
- Under 20 lbs (9 kg): Passenger airbag is usually OFF.
- 20-100 lbs (9-45 kg): Airbag status may fluctuate between ON and OFF depending on seating position and weight.
- Over 100 lbs (45 kg): Airbag is ON.
Fascinating guy. I worked at Holloman AFB for a while and marveled at a) the scope and breadth of safety systems for both aircraft and cars came out of his research and b) how much they let you get away with back in the Cold War days. I feel like the entire safety office would shit themselves inside out if you proposed, in the modern era, to fire a rocket sled down that track and see what happened when you threw on the brakes.My dad and I had the good fortune to meet Col Stapp when I was stationed in New Mexico in 1990. He gave a talk at ENMU about what he did for safety. His work is what what came up with the shoulder belts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stapp
Apparently they increased the number of levels of restraint (from 3 to 11, stated in TFA, though probably that doesn't capture the whole scope).How is the Volvo system new or different from other cars ?
I think since the below was implemented a year or so ago, Rivian or BMW or Lucid might already have the same implementation
Work travel is work.yeah but they didn’t fly the author to Sweden
Thanks for the updateThe Volvo system introduces eleven increments based on weight and force applied to the body. As TFA notes, previous modern systems had three, including Tesla:
Count them! One, two, three! Three beautiful settings, ah ah ahhh!
Also: going to Stockholm for a couple days with jetlag? Fine city and all, but eh..... maybe its interesting if you've never experienced a country that has winter or something?Work travel is work.
Unless Mercedes owned Bosch, they didn't "invent" ESP. First to implement, yea sure.It seems your list of achievements by Mercedes does not stand up to scrutiny very well. I see that ABS, airbags and ESP have complex histories that do not fit Mercedes "inventing" them. No idea how you claim that Mercedes invented hydraulic brakes. (Did not look into all your claims.)
Anybody else remember those terrible motorized shoulder belts in the 1980s/90s, or the seat belts attached to the doors? They counted as an automatic safety system so they didn't have to put in airbags. So glad I never wrecked in one of those cars. Deer don't count, minor front end damage. But yes, I have endured functional tests of crumple zones and side-impact beams in other cars made in the pre-airbag era.and a whole bunch of auto manufacturers steadfastly fought against those safety innovations.
Weirdly enough: all of them US based auto manufacturers.
Five-ish years ago there was an Ars article about this - and in fact asking if Ars should do this!Is this normal? At my job, if I need to travel to suppliers or supervised affiliates, my employer always paid for my travel and accommodation to avoid any sort of appearance of conflict of interest.
I remember reading about Chinese government paying for influencers to travel and accommodate them to different parts of China, and that was enough to consider their integrity compromised. So why is this fine? Why does Ars not pay their employees travel cost?
Not only the partnership with Bosch, but also I note the work that was going on in Japan (from wikipedia).Unless Mercedes owned Bosch, they didn't "invent" ESP. First to implement, yea sure.
Yea curtain airbags would have been helpful. I honestly can't recall if I hit my head on anything, but I don't think I did. My memory isn't good enough to recall those details from an accident nearly 30 years ago.You'd have benefited from some side curtain airbags, it sounds like. Airbag triggers are more than just the front bumper, nowadays. We also underrate how vastly we have improved the structural rigidity of cars in the last 30 years. My accident was a short flight into a deep arroyo, and I hit hard enough that the rear hatch of a 1995 Grand Cherokee popped open and couldn't close again, and several doors couldn't be opened. Now? The front end would have crumpled, but the body would have been fine, doors would have opened.