How to brew ancient Wari beer

B'Trey

Ars Scholae Palatinae
866
"Fortunately, a member of Nash's local excavation crew had an aunt in a remote village who still brewed old-school moye chicha, and she evidently didn't mind showing a group of archaeologists how it was done."

It seems like a bit of a stretch to go from "old school - this is how they did it when I was a girl" to "old school - this is how they did it over a thousand years ago."
 
Upvote
21 (28 / -7)

onkeljonas

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,703
"Fortunately, a member of Nash's local excavation crew had an aunt in a remote village who still brewed old-school moye chicha, and she evidently didn't mind showing a group of archaeologists how it was done."

It seems like a bit of a stretch to go from "old school - this is how they did it when I was a girl" to "old school - this is how they did it over a thousand years ago."
I thought the same thing. On the other hand, while it can't show that they used the same process, "you can make it in half the time compared with using corn" seems like a valuable insight.
 
Upvote
29 (29 / 0)

Nalyd

Ars Praefectus
3,031
Subscriptor
I work for Festivals, and I could not wait to see someone recreating a so old one, with art, culture, booze (chicha!) in this beautiful place: it could be one of the best experience possible!

You just need an instagram account and a few models and celebrities to take pictures of in the Andes, and the money will just start rolling in!

Pro tip: you will need to actually plan and put on the festival. Don’t forget the toilets.
 
Upvote
24 (25 / -1)
"Fortunately, a member of Nash's local excavation crew had an aunt in a remote village who still brewed old-school moye chicha, and she evidently didn't mind showing a group of archaeologists how it was done."

It seems like a bit of a stretch to go from "old school - this is how they did it when I was a girl" to "old school - this is how they did it over a thousand years ago."
No, it isn't much of a stretch.

Egyptians, ca. 3000 B.C.E., discovered the basic process for making beer (booze with grains) that we still follow to this day. Take grain > soak it > let it sprout > dry it (collectively known as malting) > soak it in warm water (mashing) > ferment the sugar water. Everything we've done since then basically amounts to process improvements from higher yielding grains with greater diastatic properties (basically, more enzymes for converting starches to sugar), to scaling up the process with steam, electricity, and really big tanks. But the basic process of malt, mash, ferment has been unchanged in at least 5,000 years.

Passing down knowledge of how to ferment something for 1,000 years? That's nothing for humans. We've passed down knowledge of how to make the same style of tools for tens of thousands of years. We've passed down knowledge of how to make cave art, in the same cave system, for thousands of years.

Frankly, we really fucking love getting lit. Really, really love it. The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. It is, literally, one of the easiest things in the world of archaeology to imagine we've more or less faithfully passed down knowledge of how to brew over a relatively short timespan like 1,000 years.

I cannot emphasize this enough. We humans love booze. And we are exceptionally clever at making booze out of anything with starch (we can break down starches into sugars with either intensive cooking or enzymes -- see "malting") or sugar.
 
Upvote
97 (101 / -4)

bongbong

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,197
Beer, wine and other alcoholic drinks would have been quite valuable in ancient times because of their antibacterial properties since natural untreated water isnt safe to drink most of the time.
Thats why in the Middle east there was a distinction made for wines to mix with water to quench everyday thirst therefore cheaper for the masses, then wine for inebriation and festivities,more expensive. Then there is cooking wine.

Also caught a grammar error in the first sentence
"round 1100 CE, they made sure nobody else could enjoy their former home by destroyed the brewery that, for 400 years"
should be "destroying".
 
Upvote
18 (20 / -2)

bongbong

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,197
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
 
Upvote
6 (13 / -7)

B'Trey

Ars Scholae Palatinae
866
"Fortunately, a member of Nash's local excavation crew had an aunt in a remote village who still brewed old-school moye chicha, and she evidently didn't mind showing a group of archaeologists how it was done."

It seems like a bit of a stretch to go from "old school - this is how they did it when I was a girl" to "old school - this is how they did it over a thousand years ago."

No, it isn't much of a stretch.

Egyptians, ca. 3000 B.C.E., discovered the basic process for making beer (booze with grains) that we still follow to this day. Take grain > soak it > let it sprout > dry it (collectively known as malting) > soak it in warm water (mashing) > ferment the sugar water. Everything we've done since then basically amounts to process improvements from higher yielding grains with greater diastatic properties (basically, more enzymes for converting starches to sugar), to scaling up the process with steam, electricity, and really big tanks. But the basic process of malt, mash, ferment has been unchanged in at least 5,000 years.

Of course the basic process is the same and of course it has been passed down over the generations. But the article makes a distinction between the way the current generation brews it and the way they brewed it a couple of generations ago. That's the point of the aunt who still does things the "old school" way. It's the details that matter in this particular context. And there's no reason I can see to think that the details of how they did it fifty or a hundred years ago are an accurate indicator of the details of how they did it a thousand years ago, and nothing in your comment changes that.
 
Upvote
15 (18 / -3)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

angleiron

Ars Centurion
280
Subscriptor
I had a chance to visit Cerro Baúl with Nash and Ryan a dozen years ago to shoot a mini documentary video for an exhibit. One thing I found very fascinating is that the "regional powers" Ryan mentions here weren't 50 miles away. A significant Tiwanaku settlement was literally on the next hilltop, and they explained to me that the archaeological evidence suggested that the cultures were quite distinct in terms of dress, burial goods, ceremonial items, etc.

The Wari may indeed have been the dominant power, and perhaps there was periodic conflict, but they employed an interesting strategy of co-operation and side-by-side co-habitation, facilitated by feasting and revelry. These "ancients" could teach us something.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
Ehhhhh, the "booze for clean drinking water" connection is ... a little off until you reach the absolutely repulsive urban living conditions of the industrial revolution. Untreated well / river / standing water has been the standard for us for a very, very long time. And it still is for about a quarter of us. There have been, in recorded history, relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze [edit] because making booze is energy and labour-intensive [edit].

I may have been flippant about my assertion that we were brewing solely to get lit. If you're drinking young, unfiltered booze, you're likely getting a crapton of B vitamins and easier to digest minerals from the yeast and bacteria slurry you're also chugging, but the primary reason to drink booze for the ancients really does appear to have been getting lit. Or, euphemistically, "ceremonial us."
 
Upvote
17 (22 / -5)

iAPX

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,038
I work for Festivals, and I could not wait to see someone recreating a so old one, with art, culture, booze (chicha!) in this beautiful place: it could be one of the best experience possible!

You just need an instagram account and a few models and celebrities to take pictures of in the Andes, and the money will just start rolling in!

Pro tip: you will need to actually plan and put on the festival. Don’t forget the toilets.
I am more on the Festivals' Mobile App side :)

And we know the Experience as a whole is mandatory today, but in this location I would go for a Fyre-type experience (without Instagram, the models and the pretension), with the needs to come by walking or bus from the Valley, real toilets, simple real Andes' food, Chicha, ...
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Needs another editing pass:

"...they made sure nobody else could enjoy their former home by destroyed the brewery that, for 400 years, ..." destroying?

"Wari hold together an empire that spanned over 1,300km (808 mils) along the Andes Mountains" miles?

Edit: also "moye"... this may be a legitimate alternate spelling, but the closest thing I could find externally was molle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schinus_molle

Searching on moye didn't come up with anything about peruvian peppercorns.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
Ehhhhh, the "booze for clean drinking water" connection is ... a little off until you reach the absolutely repulsive urban living conditions of the industrial revolution. Untreated well / river / standing water has been the standard for us for a very, very long time. And it still is for about a quarter of us. There have been, in recorded history, relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze [edit] because making booze is energy and labour-intensive [edit].

I may have been flippant about my assertion that we were brewing solely to get lit. If you're drinking young, unfiltered booze, you're likely getting a crapton of B vitamins and easier to digest minerals from the yeast and bacteria slurry you're also chugging, but the primary reason to drink booze for the ancients really does appear to have been getting lit. Or, euphemistically, "ceremonial us."
Factually incorrect, throughout the European medieval period alcohol was the stranded drink. Small beer was used rather than the stronger ales. The brewing industry was quite literally a cottage industry dominated by women. It's wasn't until the 17th century's urbanisations that much larger breweries run by men as a full time occupation that it changed.
 
Upvote
3 (9 / -6)

B'Trey

Ars Scholae Palatinae
866
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
Ehhhhh, the "booze for clean drinking water" connection is ... a little off until you reach the absolutely repulsive urban living conditions of the industrial revolution. Untreated well / river / standing water has been the standard for us for a very, very long time. And it still is for about a quarter of us. There have been, in recorded history, relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze [edit] because making booze is energy and labour-intensive [edit].

I may have been flippant about my assertion that we were brewing solely to get lit. If you're drinking young, unfiltered booze, you're likely getting a crapton of B vitamins and easier to digest minerals from the yeast and bacteria slurry you're also chugging, but the primary reason to drink booze for the ancients really does appear to have been getting lit. Or, euphemistically, "ceremonial us."
Factually incorrect, throughout the European medieval period alcohol was the stranded drink. Small beer was used rather than the stronger ales. The brewing industry was quite literally a cottage industry dominated by women. It's wasn't until the 17th century's urbanisations that much larger breweries run by men as a full time occupation that it changed.

If you're going to claim someone else is factually incorrect, it's helpful to cite support for that claim. I believe it's you who are repeating myth and are factually incorrect, based on numerous sources like this one: https://leslefts.blogspot.com/2013/11/t ... -myth.html "Not only are there specific – and very casual – mentions of people drinking water all through the Medieval era, but there seems to be no evidence that they thought of it as unhealthy except when (as today) it overtly appeared so. "
 
Upvote
17 (19 / -2)
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
Ehhhhh, the "booze for clean drinking water" connection is ... a little off until you reach the absolutely repulsive urban living conditions of the industrial revolution. Untreated well / river / standing water has been the standard for us for a very, very long time. And it still is for about a quarter of us. There have been, in recorded history, relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze [edit] because making booze is energy and labour-intensive [edit].

I may have been flippant about my assertion that we were brewing solely to get lit. If you're drinking young, unfiltered booze, you're likely getting a crapton of B vitamins and easier to digest minerals from the yeast and bacteria slurry you're also chugging, but the primary reason to drink booze for the ancients really does appear to have been getting lit. Or, euphemistically, "ceremonial us."
Factually incorrect, throughout the European medieval period alcohol was the stranded drink. Small beer was used rather than the stronger ales. The brewing industry was quite literally a cottage industry dominated by women. It's wasn't until the 17th century's urbanisations that much larger breweries run by men as a full time occupation that it changed.
Heh, "relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze." Medieval Europeans are a relatively small number of people. I know the history, that's why I had the weasel sentence in my post.
[edit] And, honestly, we were talking about ancient developments in the boozy arts. My point that we originally developed booze mostly to pursue "ceremonial uses" is, I believe, still standing even with your knockout argument about "medieval Europe."
 
Upvote
2 (4 / -2)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.
Ehhhhh, the "booze for clean drinking water" connection is ... a little off until you reach the absolutely repulsive urban living conditions of the industrial revolution. Untreated well / river / standing water has been the standard for us for a very, very long time. And it still is for about a quarter of us. There have been, in recorded history, relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze [edit] because making booze is energy and labour-intensive [edit].

I may have been flippant about my assertion that we were brewing solely to get lit. If you're drinking young, unfiltered booze, you're likely getting a crapton of B vitamins and easier to digest minerals from the yeast and bacteria slurry you're also chugging, but the primary reason to drink booze for the ancients really does appear to have been getting lit. Or, euphemistically, "ceremonial us."
Factually incorrect, throughout the European medieval period alcohol was the stranded drink. Small beer was used rather than the stronger ales. The brewing industry was quite literally a cottage industry dominated by women. It's wasn't until the 17th century's urbanisations that much larger breweries run by men as a full time occupation that it changed.
Heh, "relatively few people whose sole method of hydration has been booze." Medieval Europeans are a relatively small number of people. I know the history, that's why I had the weasel sentence in my post.
78 million lived in Europe in 1300.
 
Upvote
-1 (3 / -4)

*err0r*

Seniorius Lurkius
1
Subscriptor++
[url=https://meincmagazine.com/science/2019/05/how-to-brew-ancient-wari-beer/:1kns5pfm said:
The Article[/url]":1kns5pfm]
Inside the mass spectrometer, the sample is heated to about 9,000⁰C, which is hot enough to break down the bonds that hold molecules together. This leaves charged atoms, which get sorted by mass.

I'm going to say that this isn't within the mass spectrometer, but instead it must be a laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (LA-ICP-MS) where the high temperature is produced in the plasma.

The thing about this though is that as per the article the molecular bonds do break down. It gives you a great survey of the atoms present, but almost zero information about what molecules were present.

Following the link, they used direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) to do the work out where they determined what residues were present and hence how the beverage was made. The 9,000⁰C stuff was just to work out where the clay that the vessel was made from came from.

Maybe it doesn't matter, but the direct quote immediately afterwards reflects the DART-MS work, not the LA-ICP-MS work that singled out by the article.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)
Ferment how? Any random yeast or bacteria that falls into it?
That is a very complicated question.

Clearly, "let 'er rip" has been a thing since antiquity, and is still practiced by some lambic breweries and anyone with a wide open coolship.

But ... it's not hard to take the slurry of yeast and bacteria from a good batch of beer and use it to kickstart the next batch. Or even just getting the next batch of wort into the "special vessel" where a nice blend of yeast and bacteria has taken hold. We've likely been doing that since we've been making booze. And repitching yeast (from, usually, a pure culture) is the way we still do things commercially.
 
Upvote
9 (10 / -1)

ayrew

Seniorius Lurkius
24
Subscriptor
...I smell a fad ready to descend upon Brooklyn and other parts of NYC. Authentic artisanal gluten-free chicha, made using traditional methods, only $20 a glass, follow us on Instagram!

Definitely need to try this when I hopefully visit Machu Pichu or just Central / South America in general.

I live in Peru, and we drink Chicha de Jora whenever it's available at a restaurant (the children too) -- that's corn chicha with jora seeds, and only very mildly alcoholic. Plain corn chicha I've only tried a few times. Someone invited me to drink it once when I was out walking in the Sacred Valley, and the effect was weird, quite floaty, like I was bouncing all the way home.

With all this talk of hydration, I think people are forgetting that chicha is also essentially a liquid food. In Peru there is a tradition of boiling up all kinds of strange powders (ground beans, maca, grains, seeds, etc) to make very sustaining hot drinks.
 
Upvote
28 (28 / 0)

1337 poster

Ars Scholae Palatinae
600
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.

Surely boiling would be quicker, easier and more effective, or did they not know about it?
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

IntellectualThug

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
10,778
...I smell a fad ready to descend upon Brooklyn and other parts of NYC. Authentic artisanal gluten-free chicha, made using traditional methods, only $20 a glass, follow us on Instagram!

Definitely need to try this when I hopefully visit Machu Pichu or just Central / South America in general.

More likely LA. They're apparently a popular ornamental in SoCal. Unfortunately, I see no one selling whole berries online so this particular experiment will remain hypothetical for me.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,434
Subscriptor
I work for Festivals, and I could not wait to see someone recreating a so old one, with art, culture, booze (chicha!) in this beautiful place: it could be one of the best experience possible!

And I bet it tastes pretty good - mead-like, with sweet, peppery floral notes from the pepper berries? I'd quaff that!
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

jpcg

Ars Centurion
364
Subscriptor++
Ferment how? Any random yeast or bacteria that falls into it?
That is a very complicated question.

Clearly, "let 'er rip" has been a thing since antiquity, and is still practiced by some lambic breweries and anyone with a wide open coolship.

But ... it's not hard to take the slurry of yeast and bacteria from a good batch of beer and use it to kickstart the next batch. Or even just getting the next batch of wort into the "special vessel" where a nice blend of yeast and bacteria has taken hold. We've likely been doing that since we've been making booze. And repitching yeast (from, usually, a pure culture) is the way we still do things commercially.

Yeah if you really want to make sure you have a pretty pure colony you probably could use a procedure like the one we still use to make sourdough today: take some berries and mix them with water, wait 24-48h, make a new mixture and transfer some of the old one into it. If you repeat this and once more you get a pretty homogeneous yeast and lactobacterial colonization (ie the microorganisms that grow best in there) that you can work with. Just add this mix to a large mix of berries and water and you are set to brew. You could try and dry some of the starter mixture if you need to use it later, but the yeast and bacteria will slowly die with time so you probably shouldn’t use it after 3 or 4 months or so... The only problem I see is that the woman nowadays heats up the berries which would kill all the yeasts and bacteria that are on the surface of the berries so that step probably needs to be adapted.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Boskone

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,025
Subscriptor
So beer has been brewed for roughly 5k years... I wonder how long after it was invented there was some variation of

"You think that's hard? Hold my beer..."
5k? Much older than that. Pottery that is around 13k years old has been found with beer residue, and since it was occasionally brewed in stumps and the like it's very probably older than that. Hell, there's rules and procedures about beer in the Code of Hammurabi, as well various other places (up to and including prayers).

As for "Hold my beer", I suspect some variation was grunted out by the very first hominid who discovered inebriation. Wouldn't surprise me if most mammoth hunting parties and the like got ritually buzzed beforehand. (You know, so as to face down a multiton animal using only a burnt stick.)
 
Upvote
14 (15 / -1)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,434
Subscriptor
"Fortunately, a member of Nash's local excavation crew had an aunt in a remote village who still brewed old-school moye chicha, and she evidently didn't mind showing a group of archaeologists how it was done."

It seems like a bit of a stretch to go from "old school - this is how they did it when I was a girl" to "old school - this is how they did it over a thousand years ago."
No, it isn't much of a stretch.

...But the basic process of malt, mash, ferment has been unchanged in at least 5,000 years.

Passing down knowledge of how to ferment something for 1,000 years? That's nothing for humans. We've passed down knowledge of how to make the same style of tools for tens of thousands of years. We've passed down knowledge of how to make cave art, in the same cave system, for thousands of years..

And, speaking as a homebrewer? There's absolutely nothing I do that would be fundamentally unfamiliar to an Egyptian or a Wari priestess. You boil some yummy stuff in water until the sugar and flavor is infused in the water, you slop in the dregs of the last batch or leave it open to the air for a day or so, you let it sit in a vessel for a couple days or weeks while it foams and burbles a bit, you drink it and get happy. They'd be really impressed with my stainless stock pot and glass carboy and gas burners, being used to ceramic pots and an open fire, but there is nothing about my Saturday afternoon that would look unfamiliar to them. And I bet they could shoulder me aside and make some chicha in the same equipment if I taught them how to light the gas burner.

Frankly, we really fucking love getting lit. Really, really love it. The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. It is, literally, one of the easiest things in the world of archaeology to imagine we've more or less faithfully passed down knowledge of how to brew over a relatively short timespan like 1,000 years.r.

Especially when the process of making stuff to get us lit is really simple. There is no reason at all why that recipe and approach would have changed in 1000 years. I mean, over time, maybe proportions vary a little, maybe they use a gas flame rather than a fire, but it's basically impossible to improve the basic process of brewing, and changing it would probably result in failure.
 
Upvote
14 (15 / -1)

Snark218

Ars Legatus Legionis
36,434
Subscriptor
Ferment how? Any random yeast or bacteria that falls into it?
That is a very complicated question.

Clearly, "let 'er rip" has been a thing since antiquity, and is still practiced by some lambic breweries and anyone with a wide open coolship.

But ... it's not hard to take the slurry of yeast and bacteria from a good batch of beer and use it to kickstart the next batch. Or even just getting the next batch of wort into the "special vessel" where a nice blend of yeast and bacteria has taken hold. We've likely been doing that since we've been making booze. And repitching yeast (from, usually, a pure culture) is the way we still do things commercially.

Since they were using porous ceramic pots, I imagine your special vessel hypothesis has some merit. And like you said, if for some reason that failed, every batch leaves goo behind in the fermenter; they needn't understand the microbiology of yeast to understand that inoculating the wort with it made things happen.

There's no reason for anyone to imagine they were any less savvy about brewing than your average modern brewmaster. They clearly produced this stuff in volume.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

I_stand_alone

Smack-Fu Master, in training
90
Ferment how? Any random yeast or bacteria that falls into it?

Not sure about beer however when making mead (honey wine) they dissolved the honey in water then put it in a pot and covered the pot with cheese cloth and put it outside. Eventually, if lucky, the right yeast ended up in the pot and started munching on the sugar, converting it to alcohol as a byproduct.

If you haven't tried mead, you should. It's absolutely delicious! You can't taste the alcohol in it, so be careful.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

chanman819

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,697
Subscriptor
The evidence is tilting heavily in favour of us cultivating grains, not for bread or fried rice, but for getting wasted. ...
Actually it was because water wasnt safe to drink back then untreated so a little wine or other alcoholic beverage mixed with water killed enough pathogens to make the water safe to drink. Even little kids drank this to avoid getting diseases. Some of course loved to drink but there were many people who didnt drink to get drunk. In the Ancient Middle East there were different wines for everyday sanitizing of water then cooking wine and finally the expensive good tasting wines for drinking to merriment.

Surely boiling would be quicker, easier and more effective, or did they not know about it?

Considering pathogens weren't discovered until relatively recently, they may just end up with anecdotal evidence that people that drank from certain wells or rivers got sickly, and those that drank liquids that are boiled as part of their preparation did not.

Which is the real reason the beer would be safer to drink, if it wasn't later adulterated - the preparation of the wort requires boiling the grains - this would have been the boiling step that killed the pathogens in the water - but the same would have been true of preparing soup or tea.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

IntellectualThug

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
10,778
Oh look it's Google expert. Guess fucking what not everything on the internet is true. Try reading medieval literature and you will discover the alewife, but don't bother with centuries of contemporary writing let's go to blog on food.

First of all, alewives brewed for commercial sale to make income. They didn't produce it as a substitute for drinking water for the home.

Second making enough of it to stay hydrated would have consumed an entire household's day in labor every single day. Even with modern conveniences and advanced, specialized tools, it takes me and a buddy 12 hours of work to make and clean up after 20 gallons made in four batches. The complications of gathering the massive amount of firewood and the incredibly primitive tools make this entire "beer was used instead of water" thing absurd.

Third, and most significant: beer dehydrates you! Ethanol is a diuretic. I suppose if "beer" were <1% alcohol this problem wouldn't show up, but at that point any preservative effects of ethanol are nonexistent. Not only that, but medieval gruit ales (so, anything before the 13th century at the earliest, 15th for late adopting regions) had poor antimicrobial properties compared to hopped beers. Not to mention, if beer consumption were that totally dominant over water, every child would have been born with fetal alcohol syndrome.

We can be sure they drank a lot of it. Beer does carry nutrients and "store" grains that would otherwise spoil effectively, but the idea that people would substitute it entirely in place of water is just ridiculous.
 
Upvote
23 (25 / -2)