Especially with a Honda badge on the hood. There are brands that can command $90K on a car and move units...then there's Honda. Sorry Honda, I like you, but you're not a luxury tier brand.Unlike some EV product cancellations this is a smart business move. That car at that price point was never going to sell many units.
I think there is a very real chance that what happened to the US auto industry in the 1980's after the oil crisis of the late '70's could happen again. At that time consumers wanted small and efficient, and Detroit was still building boats. The Japanese came in a established themselves in the US market,Honda having EV's ready to launch wasn't a bad thing. But Honda had the wrong EV's. Plus, the "Afeela" always seemed like a bad PR exercise more than a serious seller, and one that took way too long, at that.
But, for Honda, this is still a terrible time to pull back from EV's, generally speaking. Toyota is finally getting its footing right with EV's (and Subaru, by extension.) I see a repeat of when Toyota won on hybrids while Honda punted.
I also see legacy automakers in the U.S. trying to bend to the will of its current regime (I mean, that's what it is..) That is a bad, bad mistake, when the rest of the world is moving ahead much faster on electrification and China is overtaking the market.
Honda has its own luxury badge (Acura), and I would posit that if they had planned to release this car under that badge, it wouldn't have made the slightest difference in the sales outcome. The badge isn't the problem.Sorry Honda, I like you, but you're not a luxury tier brand.
Yes and no. Yes on charging but...It’s a pity. For a while, late during the Biden administration, it looked like most of the barriers and challenges to EV ownership for many (but maybe not all) people were finally going to be dealt with and EV adoption might hit some kind of inflection point. Enter the Trump crowd, which took care of that pronto. But even if Trump was never elected, I could never see this Sony-Honda product working out. I think the project would have died anyway.
I’m not sure how much I agree with this. GM might have killed BrightDrop but its other brands all have multiple EVs on sale, from cheap ones to massive expensive ones.I think there is a very real chance that what happened to the US auto industry in the 1980's after the oil crisis of the late '70's could happen again. At that time consumers wanted small and efficient, and Detroit was still building boats. The Japanese came in a established themselves in the US market,
I can see the big three getting left behind again because they were slow to change. The landscape isn't 1:1, but there are enough similarities and I think the overall lack of innovation is the same.
Protectionist measures will ensure Chinese EVs aren't mainstream in the US, but when the market is actually global, it doesn't bode well for the American legacy automakers.
This tie up really seemed to be something that would only work well in the Japanese market, it seems too odd to work in the rest of the world. Killing the Afeela seems like the right move but overall I think Honda's EV strategy is lost at sea. They appear to be overreacting to the lull in EV demand but it's not clear that they're planning for when demand recovers. Also, it's likely that the US's (hopefully temporary) ass backwardness is only going to represent a modest damper on the global EV market. I love Honda but honestly they confuse the heck out of me sometimes from a strategy perspective.
Japan has mostly dropped the ball on EVs. Part of this is sunk cost fallacy (Toyota and Honda refuse to give up on their hard-won combustion engine knowledge), part of this is government meddling (a quixotic pursuit of hydrogen fuel cells even after seeing leaps in lithium battery technology).Another nail in Honda's coffin as an automobile manufacturer. I'm sad, because my first few cars were Hondas and Acuras, and I loved them.
I don't think there's any reason to be skeptical of Nissan on this issue given the somewhat modest, but very real success of the LeafNissan might be able to pivot through sheer desperation
You think? I see loads of new Hondas on the road. I could see them scaling back, but they seem on the whole to be pretty successful and well-reviewed vehicles.Another nail in Honda's coffin as an automobile manufacturer. I'm sad, because my first few cars were Hondas and Acuras, and I loved them.
Just buy a lightly used one for tens of thousands off the MSRP. They're also not really a HondaI don't comment very much, but I'm VERY bummed about the end of production on the Prolog. When my wife and I were looking at EV's it was between that an the Mach-E. My wife liked the form factor on the E, which is what we went with, but I cannot tell you how much I ADORED the physical environmental and stereo controls on the Prolog. I've seen more and more of them in the wild of late, so the end of production in December is a real downer. Ugh.
Honda having EV's ready to launch wasn't a bad thing. But Honda had the wrong EV's. Plus, the "Afeela" always seemed like a bad PR exercise more than a serious seller, and one that took way too long, at that.
But, for Honda, this is still a terrible time to pull back from EV's, generally speaking. Toyota is finally getting its footing right with EV's (and Subaru, by extension.) I see a repeat of when Toyota won on hybrids while Honda punted.
I also see legacy automakers in the U.S. trying to bend to the will of its current regime (I mean, that's what it is..) That is a bad, bad mistake, when the rest of the world is moving ahead much faster on electrification and China is overtaking the market.
Honda is going to go all in on hybrids very much like Toyota.Honda having EV's ready to launch wasn't a bad thing. But Honda had the wrong EV's. Plus, the "Afeela" always seemed like a bad PR exercise more than a serious seller, and one that took way too long, at that.
But, for Honda, this is still a terrible time to pull back from EV's, generally speaking. Toyota is finally getting its footing right with EV's (and Subaru, by extension.) I see a repeat of when Toyota won on hybrids while Honda punted.
I also see legacy automakers in the U.S. trying to bend to the will of its current regime (I mean, that's what it is..) That is a bad, bad mistake, when the rest of the world is moving ahead much faster on electrification and China is overtaking the market.
Same. I was looking at the Prologue for when the kids were older. Test drove one and really liked it. I was hoping that most of the gremlins in the platform would have been ironed out by then. Oh well.I don't comment very much, but I'm VERY bummed about the end of production on the Prolog. When my wife and I were looking at EV's it was between that an the Mach-E. My wife liked the form factor on the E, which is what we went with, but I cannot tell you how much I ADORED the physical environmental and stereo controls on the Prolog. I've seen more and more of them in the wild of late, so the end of production in December is a real downer. Ugh.
We're in year 2 of a 3 year lease on a AWD prologue. It's our first electric (and I've never been a honda fan) but the car is really great. Very wide and comfy inside, mostly intuitive controls, handles well. Only complaint is that it needs another 50 miles on the range for our typical uses.I don't comment very much, but I'm VERY bummed about the end of production on the Prolog. When my wife and I were looking at EV's it was between that an the Mach-E. My wife liked the form factor on the E, which is what we went with, but I cannot tell you how much I ADORED the physical environmental and stereo controls on the Prolog. I've seen more and more of them in the wild of late, so the end of production in December is a real downer. Ugh.
I owned and liked several Accords - five, I think, the last being a hybrid. I thought of it as a hybrid-for-performance, as opposed to a hybrid-for-economy like the Prius. In 2019 I considered another Accord hybrid, but got a Tesla instead. 82000 miles later, I'm still happy with my choice. But I'm also disappointed in Honda's reluctance to develop an EV.Honda already know the formula for one of the best cars in the world -- the Accord Hybrid -- a rock solid 4-door sedan with good ergonomics, nice interiors, a giant trunk, decent looks, and great mileage. Do that, but as an EV. I'll buy it.
On the other hand, most Japanese companies are really bad at software, especially human interface. They just don't seem to allocate enough time and resources to user interface design. Sony is no exception, maybe even worse than average (look at Nikon vs. Sony cameras for example).Afeela this was a good decision. I think Sony is very good at making high quality products. But a 90k EV car is not where things are at right now.
I my other car is an Ioniq 6... about 40k miles on it so far and its a very nice car. But every time I set foot in the Accord Hybrid I'm reminded of how high a bar Honda has set with it. If they can deliver the same value and refinement in an EV, they'll have a winner on their hands.I owned and liked several Accords - five, I think, the last being a hybrid. I thought of it as a hybrid-for-performance, as opposed to a hybrid-for-economy like the Prius. In 2019 I considered another Accord hybrid, but got a Tesla instead. 82000 miles later, I'm still happy with my choice. But I'm also disappointed in Honda's reluctance to develop an EV.
Well, yes and no.This is a horrible harbinger for what could be decimation of the US automotive industry. The rest of the world is moving to EV. The US is stuck on combustion. China now has the lead on cheap, decent EVs.
I am so disappointed that there are ZERO cheap EV options. I think this is an untapped market.
Trump's revocation of the EV tax break puts money in the hands of oil companies, but ultimately destroys any chance the US had at having a future EV market. Gone baby gone.