So, what then ? He should be barred from ever touching an eletronic device again ? He doesn't have a chance a rehabilitation ? His galaxy brain shouldn't be used by the good guys ?"I'm so sorry that I misused my galaxy brain to pull off the heist of the century against the hardest target in all the world. Sorry for the disappointments! All better now, as you can clearly see from my apology brag."
Douche.
The order in which he lists those things is telling.“It upended my life, the lives of people close to me, and affected thousands of users of the exchange.
No, you're just reading tea-leaves. Listing things in ascending order of importance is quite common in phrases like that.The order in which he lists those things is telling.
The quality of mercy is not strained, my man."I'm so sorry that I misused my galaxy brain to pull off the heist of the century against the hardest target in all the world. Sorry for the disappointments! All better now, as you can clearly see from my apology brag."
Douche.
I wonder how many people feel this way (hackers or otherwise) and would benefit from being pulled into some kind of community instead of being left to their own isolated paranoia. IMO that's a huge driver of the problems and division in our society. This guy may have never done this if he'd felt more connected to people around him and found value in his work. Not saying he's blameless, just that societal problems hurt us all. (Though I can't say I'm going to cry any tears over people losing mounds of Bitcoin.)“When I was a black hat hacker, I was isolated and paranoid,” he wrote. “Working with the good guys, being part of a team solving a bigger problem felt surprisingly good. I realized that I could use my technical skills to make a difference."
As he says his life was “upended” while his victims were just “affected,” it doesn’t sound like an ascending order was his intent.No, you're just reading tea-leaves. Listing things in ascending order of importance is quite common in phrases like that.
It's kind of THE problem, at least in the US. Spot on.I wonder how many people feel this way (hackers or otherwise) and would benefit from being pulled into some kind of community instead of being left to their own isolated paranoia. IMO that's a huge driver of the problems and division in our society. This guy may have never done this if he'd felt more connected to people around him and found value in his work. Not saying he's blameless, just that societal problems hurt us all. (Though I can't say I'm going to cry any tears over people losing mounds of Bitcoin.)
Most people want to feel good about the things they do. I'm glad he found a path to that, even if it cost him a lot on the way.
And they are continually digging under the bar so they can lower it even more.Sure he can get a security job, but I would not trust him with anything touching financials. I suppose he can be a politician though. We apparently have no bars too low for that job.
Absolutely.I wonder how many people feel this way (hackers or otherwise) and would benefit from being pulled into some kind of community
I’ve been secretly hoping that one of his type would figure out how to hack DJT’s crypto kickback empire and hurt him where he cares most. Looks like it’s up to the Ruskis, the North Koreans and the Chinese to take that on.If he’d been caught today, he’d just have to pay the pardon fee and then go back to scamming people out of cryptocurrency.
I would argue that most of the success of these cults, and also most of the reasons for people turning to criminal paths, is that too many people spend a lifetime being taught through experience that society is the adversary.Absolutely.
But, be careful what you wish for. It's what feeds cults.
See the GOP. ICE. Turning Point. etc etc.
Per the article, Lichtenstein was trying to get quick money because his startup wasn't doing well. From other reporting, it's quite clear that his main motivation was to maintain his accustomed lifestyle; tellingly, he and his wife (aka wannabe rapper Razzlekhan) spent profligately on all sorts of bougie crap in the wake of his theft. This man wasn't some disaffected undervalued outcast fighting the system, as much as he'd like others to draw that inference.This guy may have never done this if he'd felt more connected to people around him and found value in his work.
The guy was married and still stole the equivalent of billions. I think we can chalk this one up to good, old-fashioned greed and hubris.This guy may have never done this if he'd felt more connected to people around him and found value in his work.
Both sound very neutral in tone, so I guess I don't get it.As he says his life was “upended” while his victims were just “affected,” it doesn’t sound like an ascending order was his intent.
I hope he has reformed, but I’d be profoundly skeptical if looking to hire.
Perhaps he did, but he stole it from earlier sources.FDR said once, "it takes a thief to catch a thief"....
Came here to say more or less this. Mitnick was interested in the challenge, and in poking around in things. Despite the code he was charged with stealing, he was not in it for profit, and he didn't deprive anyone of their assets.One notable example is the late Kevin Mitnick, who was convicted of multiple phone and computer crime cases in the 1980s and 1990s. Mitnick eventually started his own security consulting company and became a penetration tester and public speaker for many years before his death in 2023.
Mitnick was a what one might term a sport-hacker. I can't imagine his rehabilitation would have proceeded the same way had he stolen millions (let alone billions) of dollars from financial institutions.
I do. I don't care. He did his time. He's allowed to live again. Especially if he's now on the good side of the law. Especially since his crime is pretty meh, from a moral point of view. Stealing bitcoin from idiots/criminals ranks pretty low in my book.If you don't hear the tone, then I don't know what to tell you. I don't see honesty here. YMMV
Why would they?I’ve been secretly hoping that one of his type would figure out how to hack DJT’s crypto kickback empire and hurt him where he cares most. Looks like it’s up to the Ruskis, the North Koreans and the Chinese to take that on.
How can that be? It’s 120,000 bitcoins, which were worth between $400 and $1000 in 2016.a massive 2016 crypto heist worth billions at the time
I suspect that they actually refer to the value at the time the pair was arrested, which is when the story made it into public consciousness. That was in 2022 when bitcoin was worth around $20k.How can that be? It’s 120,000 bitcoins, which were worth between $400 and $1000 in 2016.
So aren’t we talking a "mere" 50-120 million here?
The community voting is mixed, but you’re astute. People who actually work in security vetting/hiring don’t do it on vibes or patterns of speech. They look at vulnerabilities in the person. Are you in debt? Are you spending wildly? Are your contacts financially in trouble? There’s more, but financial vulnerability is massively exploitable. Just look at the president of the USA, who would never get a clearance due to incredible debt, lavish and uncontrolled spending, and contacts with all the same issues.Per the article, Lichtenstein was trying to get quick money because his startup wasn't doing well. From other reporting, it's quite clear that his main motivation was to maintain his accustomed lifestyle;