Everyone should get a COVID booster this fall, CDC says

Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Kevinv

Ars Scholae Palatinae
899
Subscriptor++
Upvote
23 (24 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

StarKruzr

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,139
Subscriptor
Vinay Prasad has written lots of good papers and videos on this. It is pretty amazing how thin the evidence has been for taking additional doses. For example:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmZzZIcqIrI

LOL VINAY PRASAD HOLY SHIT

my favorite thing about this fucking monster is that he was pro-vaccine until he figured out how much money there was in being like you and lending the authority of his academic appointment to it.

I think there has not been robust data to support the subsequent repeated booster shots. I think if one is elderly or immunosuppressed, it seems reasonable to get repeated boosters. But for ages 6 months to 50 years ... it's pretty questionable if the booster is of benefit.
you think wrong. the only way what you are saying makes any sense is if you do not consider "benefit" to include "less chance of getting infected and transmitting to someone else." which would, the rest of us with functioning neurons agree, be a desperately fucking stupid position to take.

not that I expect anyone to respond, but why can't we ban these disinformation peddlers? what value are they adding to the Ars forum?
 
Upvote
21 (25 / -4)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

nimelennar

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
10,028
Did you even bother to look at the video I linked here?
Generally, people aren't going to.

Debate goes thus:

You take a position. You make a claim to justify the position. You present evidence to support your claim. People examine the evidence, and then try to refute it.

Debate does not go "and you'll find proof of that by watching this 25-minute video."

We're not going to do your homework for you. If you understand the evidence Prasad is presenting, then explain it to us yourself. Or at least quote the relevant bits of the video. Don't expect us to spend 25 minutes of our time holding up your end of the debate for you.
 
Upvote
19 (20 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

nimelennar

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
10,028
Seriously - you want to ban someone for disagreeing with you (he is right of course)? Wow.
Disagreement isn't against forum rules.

Misinformation, on the other hand, is:
Posting guidelines said:
14. No spreading misinformation. If you want to argue the merits of homeopathy or the dangers of fluoride in drinking water, do it somewhere else.

Of course, to someone who has bought into misinformation, it may seem like a simple disagreement.
 
Upvote
25 (27 / -2)

AmanoJyaku

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
16,197
not that I expect anyone to respond, but why can't we ban these disinformation peddlers? what value are they adding to the Ars forum?

Revenue, which Ars needs to survive. I understand Aurich's position on open dialog, though I've called him out for not moderating people who've clearly broken forum rules. It's a problem, and it will continue to be a problem.

That being said.... While the study provided does show infection as providing stronger protection compared to current COVID vaccines, "get infected to get protected" is still a dumb position to take. Your "immunity" wears off regardless of the source, and the study shows this: by week 23 efficacy against reinfection is 50%, and 36% by week 40. That gives you two opportunities per year to catch COVID, and dozens of opportunities over the course of a lifetime for something to go wrong.

Worse, the study notes it has limitations: scarcity of data, publication bias, and residual confounding, among others. The results are not to be taken at face value, further work must be done, and with directly collected data.
 
Upvote
16 (19 / -3)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I'll just walk down the road to my local pharmacy, get my covid vaccine for free, and walk home again.

Canada has problems, but its sure nice not having to cough up $200+ for a vaccination.

Yup, I did exactly that, (got the bivalent Pfizer vaccine) on the opposite side of the world (approx.) - NZ

For us:
Regardless of how many boosters you have had, you can get an additional booster now if you are:
  • aged 30 and over
  • pregnant, and aged 16 or over
  • aged 12 to 29 and at higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Samare

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
100
So you are lying through your back teeth by ignoring the European Medicines Agency and the European CDC.

Lets see what the EMA says:
"EMA expects future COVID-19 vaccination campaigns to take place once per year in the EU using updated COVID-19 vaccines, at the start of the cold season."
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-...ovid-19-medicines/covid-19-vaccines-key-facts
EMC and ECDC joint statement:
"For individuals above 5 years of age, when vaccination is recommended according to national guidelines, a single dose of the newly adapted vaccine is indicated.
For children below 5 years of age, without history of vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, a primary series composed of 2 or 3 doses depending on the specific newly adapted vaccine to be administered is indicated. Use in paediatric population is expected to follow national guidelines.

People with weakened immune systems may need additional doses in line with national recommendations.

For revaccinations, a minimum interval of 3 months should be adhered to, however a minimum interval of 4 months between doses may be considered in the light of evidence showing a high level of protection against severe disease for at least 4 months after vaccination"


So essentially you are spreading medical misinformation. Why? Eviidence easily proves you wrong. What motive do you have to make such announcements that are easily disproved.
Who says that the EMA has conflicts of interest?
https://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7431
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-13 (0 / -13)

The Lurker Beneath

Ars Tribunus Militum
6,683
Subscriptor
The first Moderna shot produced no reaction at all. The booster was terrible. The two subsequent vaccines made me feel like I had a bad cold. I'm wondering what will happen with the next one, which I hope to get in late October.

Probably depends a lot on how your immune system is feeling on the day. Personally I got 2 x AZ and a Moderna booster, and while the first AZ gave me minor chills and fatigue the next day, it was very slight. And the others were negligible.
 
Upvote
3 (5 / -2)

The Lurker Beneath

Ars Tribunus Militum
6,683
Subscriptor
Well you have announced your own authority on the subject, therefore you would be able to handily show the relative risks of the vaccines to the virus with respects to COVID with evidence.

Gunfire was the leading risk to children in the US, that doesn't mean you stop wearing seatbelts. Just because something isn't the leading risk is not the reason to stop using them. There are safety mechanisms that aren't safe for certain age groups like air bags, but that is based on cold hard evidence.

You of course have evidence, right?

Because my cursory review as a non-expert came up with this from JAMA in January:
"In this cross-sectional study of underlying causes of death among children aged 0 to 19 years in the US, we compared leading causes of death in 2019 with COVID-19 deaths. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, comparisons of COVID-19 disease severity between age groups were a vital tool for appropriately allocating limited resources and prioritizing vaccination campaigns. However, long-term public health planning and management needs to be informed by the leading causes of deaths within each age group, a practice in the US dating back at least 7 decades, beginning with the first publication of a leading cause of death ranking in 1952.2 The most recent comprehensive prepandemic data on leading causes of death covers 2019.2 Compared with this period, we found that COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in CYP aged 0 to 19 years in the US for the period of August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022, ranking eighth among all causes of deaths (representing 2.0% of all causes of death). Considering other 12-month periods during the pandemic did not qualitatively change our findings (Figure 2), nor did comparing with non–COVID-19 causes of death in other periods (ie, 2015-2019, 2020, and 2021).

While other causes of death, such as unintentional injuries (18.4%), assault (6.9%), and suicide (6.8%) represented a large percentage of all causes of death, COVID-19 ranked fifth in disease-related causes of deaths (excluding unintentional injuries, assault, and suicide), and first in deaths caused by infectious and respiratory diseases. Comparing deaths from COVID-19 with deaths from other vaccine-preventable diseases historically, COVID-19 caused substantially more deaths (821 deaths in our study period in CYP) than major vaccine-preventable diseases did before vaccines became available: hepatitis A (3 reported deaths in children per year in the US), rotavirus (20-60 reported deaths in children per year in the US), rubella (17 reported deaths in children per year in the US), varicella (50 reported deaths in children per year in the US),15 and measles (495 total reported deaths per year,16 the vast majority in children17)."

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816
So if it is more deadly then other preventable diseases that we have on a vaccine schedule, what motivation do we have for not having a vaccine used for COVID-19. It would take evidence that the vaccine is more deadly then COVID-19, and it would also have to account for all the long term impacts of either.

But you are the self anointed expert, I therefore assume you will expertly render evidence to show such a case.


In comparing the death rate from Covid to that other diseases prior to vaccines becoming available, you are forgetting that Covid had the benefit of an immunologically naive population in which it could spread unchecked. The exact impact of measles etc. on the New World after Spanish colonisation is not really known, but is probably a better comparison. If it was anything as bad as is commonly asserted - admittedly it appeals to certain political trends, and in such cases one must always be cautious - it was infinitely worse than Covid.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-12 (0 / -12)

The Lurker Beneath

Ars Tribunus Militum
6,683
Subscriptor
Well, first of all, has anyone found any conclusive research tying blood clotting deaths to the vaccine? You understand the premise of a nul hypothesis, right? Your family being panicked and traumatized doesn't make them better at analyzing risk, it makes them worse.

The anomalous blood clotting that is a rare reaction associated with the two adenovirus vaccines (AZ and J&J) is very well established. Their use was temporarily suspended in many countries when it became known, and restarted once there was a handle on its frequency. Here's an example of a paper discussing it, but I'm sure there is more recent work if you want to investigate it: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210707112432.htm
 
Upvote
6 (7 / -1)

veldrin

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,825
Yeah I have no HI so I might skip.

This stuff should be free. Too bad the United States electorate has determined that this is just fine; perfectly fine.
Hopefully they'll get the Bridge Access Program sorted out in the next couple of weeks so those of us without insurance or with insurance plans that don't cover vaccinations can get a booster without charge. I would be very surprised if Walmart, at least, doesn't choose to participate.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Tofystedeth

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,413
Subscriptor++
LOL VINAY PRASAD HOLY SHIT

my favorite thing about this fucking monster is that he was pro-vaccine until he figured out how much money there was in being like you and lending the authority of his academic appointment to it.


you think wrong. the only way what you are saying makes any sense is if you do not consider "benefit" to include "less chance of getting infected and transmitting to someone else." which would, the rest of us with functioning neurons agree, be a desperately fucking stupid position to take.

not that I expect anyone to respond, but why can't we ban these disinformation peddlers? what value are they adding to the Ars forum?
If you thnik they're spreading dis/misinformation, report the post. It's against the posting guidelines.
 
Upvote
9 (10 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

JustaGuyintheEU

Smack-Fu Master, in training
1
Reading this while recovering from light flu symptoms and I have my first positive COVID test. I work in a IT support job in a major city hospital. Lots a flu going around in our IT department. Doing a @home COVID test is not mandatory but I heard from other colleagues that had positive tests.

The Medical Hospital staff that has patient contact will be able to get vaccinated at the start of October. Vulnerable people, such as people over 60 and pregnant women, can also get a shot. From mid October on every one who feels they need a shot can make an appointment to get a free dosis.

I‘m not able to thank a vaccine for my mild symptoms. The new vaccinations will start too late for the current round of infections we are experiencing here. I am great full for the vaccines and I‘m making sure that my 80+ years old father will get his shot but I can’t understand that healthy young people here are taking totally unnecessary shots. Even if there is little risks from the shots. That risk is not 0.
 
Upvote
-11 (0 / -11)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Just your daily reminder that all the vaccines for the SARS-COV-2 virus and its associated disease COVID19 have been tested extensively across multiple age groups. In fact it was the tremendous response of citizens around the world to calls for Stage 3 trial volunteers that allowed those trials to be completed rapidly in parallel, an amount of testing unprecedented in modern pharmaceutical development. And the tests continued for Beta and Delta-varient-specific boosters - not released due to those variants being superceded by Omicron - and the Omicron/Prime bivalent vaccine. In fact extensive long-term testing continues today with ~30 research institutions and 15,000 volunteers enrolled in just the one large US NIH-sponsored study. Finally, the COVID19 mRNA vaccines were based on 21 years of research into developing a vaccine for SARS1, for which candidate vaccines successfully completed large Phase 2 trials before the virus burned itself out, and MERS for which unfortunately no successful vaccine candidate has yet emerged.

[I was particularly impressed by the 11-15 y.o.s who volunteered for age group Stage 3 trials in the fall of 2021. I considered myself a sciency kid at that age but that group of young adults was fully knowledgeable on how clinical trials are conducted and what the risk/benefits were]
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

Hmnhntr

Ars Scholae Palatinae
3,140
This should be the new slogan... "Ars: Where all the lefties stroke their egos together".
The irony of saying that in support of comment where he starts by rambling about how smart he is, and how smart the people he's met are....only to proceed immediately to "I suspect, without proof".
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

Hmnhntr

Ars Scholae Palatinae
3,140
You have to be crazy to inject yourself with this dangerous untested substance, the risks of which far outweigh any 'benefits'.
A fat 65+ y.o. with heart / lung issues may get a jab, but recommending it for "everyone" is madness, given the extremely low risk and far safer early treatments. Not to mention the healthy lifestyle.
Injecting babies is beyond insane.

It will be a good test for the sheepishness of the population.
Dangerous? Citation needed.

Untested? Just factually untrue.
 
Upvote
18 (19 / -1)