Not everyone is at the same risk, but advisors called for simplicity and equity.
See full article...
See full article...
And Bill Gates has reptile DNA.Yeah, right! You believe that?
Even if those people are the actually in this group andrubber stampvote, we all know it's Gates who pulls their strings.
You think Prasad is an authority on vaccines?Vinay Prasad has written lots of good papers and videos on this. It is pretty amazing how thin the evidence has been for taking additional doses. For example:
Vinay Prasad has written lots of good papers and videos on this. It is pretty amazing how thin the evidence has been for taking additional doses. For example:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmZzZIcqIrI
you think wrong. the only way what you are saying makes any sense is if you do not consider "benefit" to include "less chance of getting infected and transmitting to someone else." which would, the rest of us with functioning neurons agree, be a desperately fucking stupid position to take.I think there has not been robust data to support the subsequent repeated booster shots. I think if one is elderly or immunosuppressed, it seems reasonable to get repeated boosters. But for ages 6 months to 50 years ... it's pretty questionable if the booster is of benefit.
Generally, people aren't going to.Did you even bother to look at the video I linked here?
Nothing says SCIENCE like encouraging people to hide their illness and to refuse to take precautions.No, because you are a hyper-partisan. It isn't because you are actually interested in the science or any of the debate around it.
Disagreement isn't against forum rules.Seriously - you want to ban someone for disagreeing with you (he is right of course)? Wow.
Posting guidelines said:14. No spreading misinformation. If you want to argue the merits of homeopathy or the dangers of fluoride in drinking water, do it somewhere else.
not that I expect anyone to respond, but why can't we ban these disinformation peddlers? what value are they adding to the Ars forum?
I'll just walk down the road to my local pharmacy, get my covid vaccine for free, and walk home again.
Canada has problems, but its sure nice not having to cough up $200+ for a vaccination.
Who says that the EMA has conflicts of interest?So you are lying through your back teeth by ignoring the European Medicines Agency and the European CDC.
Lets see what the EMA says:
"EMA expects future COVID-19 vaccination campaigns to take place once per year in the EU using updated COVID-19 vaccines, at the start of the cold season."
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-...ovid-19-medicines/covid-19-vaccines-key-facts
EMC and ECDC joint statement:
"For individuals above 5 years of age, when vaccination is recommended according to national guidelines, a single dose of the newly adapted vaccine is indicated.
For children below 5 years of age, without history of vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, a primary series composed of 2 or 3 doses depending on the specific newly adapted vaccine to be administered is indicated. Use in paediatric population is expected to follow national guidelines.
People with weakened immune systems may need additional doses in line with national recommendations.
For revaccinations, a minimum interval of 3 months should be adhered to, however a minimum interval of 4 months between doses may be considered in the light of evidence showing a high level of protection against severe disease for at least 4 months after vaccination"
So essentially you are spreading medical misinformation. Why? Eviidence easily proves you wrong. What motive do you have to make such announcements that are easily disproved.
The first Moderna shot produced no reaction at all. The booster was terrible. The two subsequent vaccines made me feel like I had a bad cold. I'm wondering what will happen with the next one, which I hope to get in late October.
Well you have announced your own authority on the subject, therefore you would be able to handily show the relative risks of the vaccines to the virus with respects to COVID with evidence.
Gunfire was the leading risk to children in the US, that doesn't mean you stop wearing seatbelts. Just because something isn't the leading risk is not the reason to stop using them. There are safety mechanisms that aren't safe for certain age groups like air bags, but that is based on cold hard evidence.
You of course have evidence, right?
Because my cursory review as a non-expert came up with this from JAMA in January:
"In this cross-sectional study of underlying causes of death among children aged 0 to 19 years in the US, we compared leading causes of death in 2019 with COVID-19 deaths. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, comparisons of COVID-19 disease severity between age groups were a vital tool for appropriately allocating limited resources and prioritizing vaccination campaigns. However, long-term public health planning and management needs to be informed by the leading causes of deaths within each age group, a practice in the US dating back at least 7 decades, beginning with the first publication of a leading cause of death ranking in 1952.2 The most recent comprehensive prepandemic data on leading causes of death covers 2019.2 Compared with this period, we found that COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in CYP aged 0 to 19 years in the US for the period of August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022, ranking eighth among all causes of deaths (representing 2.0% of all causes of death). Considering other 12-month periods during the pandemic did not qualitatively change our findings (Figure 2), nor did comparing with non–COVID-19 causes of death in other periods (ie, 2015-2019, 2020, and 2021).
While other causes of death, such as unintentional injuries (18.4%), assault (6.9%), and suicide (6.8%) represented a large percentage of all causes of death, COVID-19 ranked fifth in disease-related causes of deaths (excluding unintentional injuries, assault, and suicide), and first in deaths caused by infectious and respiratory diseases. Comparing deaths from COVID-19 with deaths from other vaccine-preventable diseases historically, COVID-19 caused substantially more deaths (821 deaths in our study period in CYP) than major vaccine-preventable diseases did before vaccines became available: hepatitis A (3 reported deaths in children per year in the US), rotavirus (20-60 reported deaths in children per year in the US), rubella (17 reported deaths in children per year in the US), varicella (50 reported deaths in children per year in the US),15 and measles (495 total reported deaths per year,16 the vast majority in children17)."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816
So if it is more deadly then other preventable diseases that we have on a vaccine schedule, what motivation do we have for not having a vaccine used for COVID-19. It would take evidence that the vaccine is more deadly then COVID-19, and it would also have to account for all the long term impacts of either.
But you are the self anointed expert, I therefore assume you will expertly render evidence to show such a case.
Well, first of all, has anyone found any conclusive research tying blood clotting deaths to the vaccine? You understand the premise of a nul hypothesis, right? Your family being panicked and traumatized doesn't make them better at analyzing risk, it makes them worse.
That's preposterous!And Bill Gates has reptile DNA.
/s
Hopefully they'll get the Bridge Access Program sorted out in the next couple of weeks so those of us without insurance or with insurance plans that don't cover vaccinations can get a booster without charge. I would be very surprised if Walmart, at least, doesn't choose to participate.Yeah I have no HI so I might skip.
This stuff should be free. Too bad the United States electorate has determined that this is just fine; perfectly fine.
If you want people to believe you? Stop repeating popular lies as if they were truth, would be a good start.Just keep following the lemmings
I'm sure they'll lead you all to a better place
If you thnik they're spreading dis/misinformation, report the post. It's against the posting guidelines.LOL VINAY PRASAD HOLY SHIT
my favorite thing about this fucking monster is that he was pro-vaccine until he figured out how much money there was in being like you and lending the authority of his academic appointment to it.
you think wrong. the only way what you are saying makes any sense is if you do not consider "benefit" to include "less chance of getting infected and transmitting to someone else." which would, the rest of us with functioning neurons agree, be a desperately fucking stupid position to take.
not that I expect anyone to respond, but why can't we ban these disinformation peddlers? what value are they adding to the Ars forum?
The irony of saying that in support of comment where he starts by rambling about how smart he is, and how smart the people he's met are....only to proceed immediately to "I suspect, without proof".This should be the new slogan... "Ars: Where all the lefties stroke their egos together".
Dangerous? Citation needed.You have to be crazy to inject yourself with this dangerous untested substance, the risks of which far outweigh any 'benefits'.
A fat 65+ y.o. with heart / lung issues may get a jab, but recommending it for "everyone" is madness, given the extremely low risk and far safer early treatments. Not to mention the healthy lifestyle.
Injecting babies is beyond insane.
It will be a good test for the sheepishness of the population.