Kirk Milhoan's comments come as federal vaccine policy slides to insignificance.
See full article...
See full article...
Where the hell did this quack get his medical degree, The School of Phlogiston and Miasma Studies?Early into the discussion, Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist, declared, “I don’t like established science,” and that “science is what I observe.” He lambasted the evidence-based methodology that previous ACIP panels used to carefully and transparently craft vaccine policy.
Unfortunately, the consequences often bear no strong connection with only those who set those consequences in motion.Elections have consequences. Sometimes those consequences take the form of iron lungs.
I'm going to guess some online course gave him that degree; when I hear statements like his -- and he's apparently a PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGIST -- I wonder how many kids he's killed. He clearly doesn't have the expertise to provide any medical service.Where the hell did this quack get his medical degree, The School of Phlogiston and Miasma Studies?
Reminds me of an old chestnut:Where the hell did this quack get his medical degree, The School of Phlogiston and Miasma Studies?
No worries, they will be Golden Lungs this time aroundElections have consequences. Sometimes those consequences take the form of iron lungs.
Jefferson Medical College, with a PhD from UCSD, where he also did his medical residency. Both are good schools. But even good schools can graduate bad people.Where the hell did this quack get his medical degree, The School of Phlogiston and Miasma Studies?
If I face-palmed every time this regime did something boneheadedly stupid, I wouldn’t have a face left.Doctors face-palm as RFK Jr.’s top vaccine advisor questions need for polio shot
Pfft, with modern' medical insurance, we'll be damn lucky if we get Tin Lungs.No worries, they will be Golden Lungs this time around
Some of the most ignorant people I know are MD's. And I know many MD's.Reminds me of an old chestnut:
What do you call someone who graduates from medical school at the bottom of their class?
Doctor.
I think that's a big part of the problem. Polio is long enough in the past that many people don't have that personal connection anymore. Sure, you might hear about great-grandpa's leg not really working right, but that's theoretical. Those of us who are old enough to have actual direct personal contact with polio-damaged people are in the minorityI know people who were afflicted with polio when they were young. I've seen what it does. Following the success of the vaccines, few people in the US now have any idea what a horrible scourge it was.
RFK jr and his minions are monsters.
Can't wait till we guillotine this ghoul and his ilk when we get the country back.
Science is only what's observable to him?
Let's run a trial, leave him on an island with some rabid dogs. First, we'll test without vaccinating him, then maybe if he lives, we'll do round 2.
His license to kill children ... I mean, practice ... should be revoked. Why would you put any trust in this dishonest and unprincipled practitioner. He's based in ... wait for it ... Texass.In a statement, AMA Trustee Sandra Adamson Fryhofer blasted the question. “This is not a theoretical debate—it is a dangerous step backward,” she said. “Vaccines have saved millions of lives and virtually eliminated devastating diseases like polio in the United States. There is no cure for polio. When vaccination rates fall, paralysis, lifelong disability, and death return. The science on this is settled.”
Image caption said:Kirk Milhoan, James Pagano, and Robert Malone are seen during a meeting of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on September 18, 2025
Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist, declared, “I don’t like established science,” and that “science is what I observe.”
Below are screenshots of the grifting quack in his malpractice role and Bible banger role.The Independent Medical Alliance (formerly Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance [FLCCC]) is a group of physicians and former journalists, formed in April 2020, that has advocated for various unapproved, dubious, and ineffective treatments for COVID-19 (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and other miscellaneous combinations of drugs and vitamins).


"science is what I observe"
Education doesn’t necessarily make good or smart people. Who were the biggest supporters of the Nazis by demographic?Jefferson Medical College, with a PhD from UCSD, where he also did his medical residency. Both are good schools. But even good schools can graduate bad people.
Harold Shipman and Andrew Wakefield were doctors too.But even good schools can graduate bad people.
Ah, but then we need to use "raw water" in the baby formula. Problem solved!The sanitation thing about polio is especially dark comedy.
One of the leading theories of the 20th century paralytic polio epidemic was improved sanitation. Prior to indoor plumbing, the vast majority of people were exposed to polio in their first few months of life. During that time, they are still protected by parental antibodies, and thus able to protect themselves while they develop their own immune system. Thus, polio was common but paralysis was relatively uncommon. Improved sanitation, while very important for controlling polio, initially meant that many more people were not exposed until they were 5-15 years old. At which time they no longer had protective antibodies and were much more likely to develop paralysis.
...how is this misleading? Even with the chance to avoid infection reducing "overall" risk it's still orders of magnitude more dangerous to not get vaccinated.As-phrased, this can be fairly viewed as "possibly misleading" - and we should be exactly correct when we're fighting misinformation.
- The risk of the individual vaccines to an individual IS very small for all approved vaccines.
- The risk of damage from the disease IS many orders of magnitude greater than that risk ONCE the individual becomes infected.
- however, the phrasing above conflates outcomes once infected with overall risk (eg. expected value) of those negative outcomes.
That this sad excuse for a medical (ahem) 'professional' even suggests stopping vaccination so that we just rely on natural defense and recovery (or not) is abhorrent."If we take away all of the herd immunity, then does that switch, does that teeter-totter switch in a different direction?"
So, it seems that may be what they are aiming for, lots of sick people, some or many of whom die or are severely injured in order for the rest of the surviving population to become immunized.The protection given to a community against an epidemic of a contagious disease when a sufficient number of the population are immunised or otherwise develop immunity to it.
-- Wiktionary
Herd immunity is when enough people in an area have immunity to (protection from) a disease that it no longer spreads easily. It usually takes a large number of people getting vaccinated against or infected with the germ to achieve herd immunity.
Without vaccination, herd immunity might only be achieved if a very large number of people get sick — and potentially die — very quickly.
-- Cleveland Clinic